2008 section no longer needed..?

  • 8 replies
  • 3719 views

pmg911

  • *****
  • 4073
2008 section no longer needed..?
« on: May 04, 2009, 01:03:22 PM »
Since the kids in the 2008 recruiting class are now finishing up their Freshman year maybe its time to get rid of the 2008 section.

They aren't recruits anylonger...

Maybe we add 2012.?

peter

  • *****
  • 3551
    • Rumble in the Garden
Re: 2008 section no longer needed..?
« Reply #1 on: May 04, 2009, 01:12:40 PM »
Nah, the 2008 section is good for history, referencing what people said about, say, Ty Edmondson.  No restriction against creating new year sub-pages.  Good idea, PMG.

Re: 2008 section no longer needed..?
« Reply #2 on: May 04, 2009, 01:26:03 PM »
i think it's good there's a place we can go back and reference these things.

Re: 2008 section no longer needed..?
« Reply #3 on: May 04, 2009, 01:27:02 PM »
Agreed its great for point of reference stuff.

I could make another sub board to put recruiting archives and put 2008 in it but then that is just extra clicking. At some point we will have to get to that point because the main board will have too many years underneath but until then we'll keep access easy.
Follow Johnny Jungle on Twitter at @Johnny_Jungle

pmg911

  • *****
  • 4073
Re: 2008 section no longer needed..?
« Reply #4 on: May 04, 2009, 03:02:31 PM »
Nah, the 2008 section is good for history, referencing what people said about, say, Ty Edmondson.  No restriction against creating new year sub-pages.  Good idea, PMG.

but should it still be in the "recuiting" area. . these kids aren't recruits any longer...   

Re: 2008 section no longer needed..?
« Reply #5 on: May 04, 2009, 03:14:28 PM »
I think that crap should be moved to off topic.   ;D

peter

  • *****
  • 3551
    • Rumble in the Garden
Re: 2008 section no longer needed..?
« Reply #6 on: May 04, 2009, 04:40:04 PM »
Nah, the 2008 section is good for history, referencing what people said about, say, Ty Edmondson.  No restriction against creating new year sub-pages.  Good idea, PMG.

but should it still be in the "recuiting" area. . these kids aren't recruits any longer...
Sure!  No reason to create a "players we didn't get, dammit" area.  We know them in the context of recruiting possibilities for St. John's....

Re: 2008 section no longer needed..?
« Reply #7 on: May 04, 2009, 05:24:42 PM »
Nah, the 2008 section is good for history, referencing what people said about, say, Ty Edmondson.  No restriction against creating new year sub-pages.  Good idea, PMG.

but should it still be in the "recuiting" area. . these kids aren't recruits any longer...

Its still a recruiting database for all recruits of that class year. Where else would you put it? I'm open to ideas if you have some but I think its set up pretty well right now.
Follow Johnny Jungle on Twitter at @Johnny_Jungle

Re: 2008 section no longer needed..?
« Reply #8 on: May 04, 2009, 09:43:16 PM »
Just wanna say how this here is the foundation of a library fo St. John histry and that I cant imagine any other site havin the depth and knowledge of this here one. When all the others is dead, this one will be the archive becasue of the work JJ and a lotta brothers put in. 

Props.

Parking only for NYCHA permit holders.