Under Armour

  • 576 replies
  • 76871 views
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #440 on: August 20, 2013, 11:33:50 AM »
At what point is St. John's Redmen/RedStorm wearing BLUE uniforms?

I agree with the question. Our colors are red (and white). No more.
« Last Edit: August 20, 2013, 11:34:35 AM by gonzalo »

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #441 on: August 20, 2013, 08:27:06 PM »
Remember who broke the Slice news

Re: Under Armour
« Reply #442 on: August 20, 2013, 08:30:59 PM »

Re: Under Armour
« Reply #443 on: August 20, 2013, 09:01:49 PM »
I didn't think I would like the blue but that looks good.  I'm easy.

MCNPA

  • *****
  • 5975
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #444 on: August 20, 2013, 09:06:59 PM »

Re: Under Armour
« Reply #445 on: August 20, 2013, 11:03:51 PM »
those are awesome
*wipes ketchup from his eyes* - I guess Heinz sight isn’t 20/20.

Re: Under Armour
« Reply #446 on: August 21, 2013, 12:09:30 AM »
Undecided if I'm pro or con, but I appreciate the effort. Looking forward to seeing what else UA might try.

LoganK

  • ****
  • 739
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #447 on: August 21, 2013, 12:38:18 AM »

Re: Under Armour
« Reply #448 on: August 21, 2013, 02:29:13 PM »
http://instagram.com/p/dSPk5An9S3/

They didn't show the shorts in the original pictures.  Burn them.  Looks like a bad bathing suit.

Re: Under Armour
« Reply #449 on: August 21, 2013, 02:34:25 PM »
http://instagram.com/p/dSPk5An9S3/

They didn't show the shorts in the original pictures.  Burn them.  Looks like a bad bathing suit.

Yea those aren't to good looking. Loved the tops. Just go with all ride with blue piping on the side.
*wipes ketchup from his eyes* - I guess Heinz sight isn’t 20/20.

LJSA

  • *****
  • 2364
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #450 on: August 21, 2013, 03:58:18 PM »
Looks like a bad bathing suit.

Definitely an Old Navy clearance bin vibe to them.

redslope

  • *****
  • 1823
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #451 on: August 21, 2013, 04:08:03 PM »
I thought theywere going to get rid of the "TJ" combination with the new look?

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #452 on: August 21, 2013, 04:09:11 PM »
I thought theywere going to get rid of the "TJ" combination with the new look?

Down the road
Remember who broke the Slice news

Re: Under Armour
« Reply #453 on: August 21, 2013, 05:06:08 PM »
I agree, those shorts are hideous!

thetruth8734

  • ****
  • 613
  • SJU Alum
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #454 on: August 21, 2013, 05:19:28 PM »
Those shorts are awesome. I'd rock em.

Re: Under Armour
« Reply #455 on: August 21, 2013, 05:24:26 PM »
Definitely an Old Navy clearance bin vibe to them.

Nail on the head.
« Last Edit: August 21, 2013, 05:24:45 PM by LowBallJ »

Re: Under Armour
« Reply #456 on: August 21, 2013, 05:30:59 PM »
They're similar to USF's shorts from last year

Re: Under Armour
« Reply #457 on: August 21, 2013, 05:38:12 PM »
I would love to see the wardrobe you stylish men sport as now half of you are fashion/design experts and know what is in and out!

Also, the new issues of GQ, Esquire and Details are out on the newsstands now.

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #458 on: August 21, 2013, 07:32:24 PM »
I would love to see the wardrobe you stylish men sport as now half of you are fashion/design experts and know what is in and out!

Also, the new issues of GQ, Esquire and Details are out on the newsstands now.

If half of the board are fashion experts than 100% of the board are retired basketball coaches I guess.
Remember who broke the Slice news

Re: Under Armour
« Reply #459 on: August 21, 2013, 09:26:49 PM »
They're similar to USF's shorts from last year

Looks like sputum (whatever that is).