Top performer

  • 6 replies
  • 1084 views

Poison

  • *****
  • 16896
Top performer
« on: February 26, 2009, 04:53:58 PM »
Maybe it should be empty?

peter

  • *****
  • 3551
    • Rumble in the Garden
Re: Top performer
« Reply #1 on: February 26, 2009, 05:10:57 PM »
Nah, each game's best should be honored.  You could have a Least Valuable Performer and put the coach's face up there... but that ain't nice.

Poison

  • *****
  • 16896
Re: Top performer
« Reply #2 on: February 26, 2009, 05:28:14 PM »
Nah, each game's best should be honored.  You could have a Least Valuable Performer and put the coach's face up there... but that ain't nice.

I like horne, but he had a lousy game. 17 points, and half of them in garbage time.

pmg911

  • *****
  • 4073
Re: Top performer
« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2009, 08:08:50 AM »
Nah, each game's best should be honored. 

When the team gets embarrasssed at home by 29 points. . there is no "games best performer"

Dave you should put a big X up there...

Re: Top performer
« Reply #4 on: February 27, 2009, 08:36:23 AM »
Put Stephenson up there!

peter

  • *****
  • 3551
    • Rumble in the Garden
Re: Top performer
« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2009, 10:05:17 AM »
Nah, each game's best should be honored. 

When the team gets embarrasssed at home by 29 points. . there is no "games best performer"

Dave you should put a big X up there...
I liked Horne's timing on put backs.  And he was better than... pretty much everyone else besides DJ.  Ain't everything got to be a negative all the time. 

Re: Top performer
« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2009, 02:55:20 PM »
I considered removing it, I really did, but I didn't put a nickname in this time instead. Horne was the team's top performer not that is much of an accomplishment.
Follow Johnny Jungle on Twitter at @Johnny_Jungle