Reranking the class of 2011

  • 5 replies
  • 1114 views

NYCoffey

  • *****
  • 1260
Reranking the class of 2011
« on: June 06, 2012, 12:12:56 PM »
Cannon went back and re ranked the class of 2011 based on their performance this year. DeAngelo at 10 and Mo at 7.

http://www.basketballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=2330

Re: Reranking the class of 2011
« Reply #1 on: June 06, 2012, 12:31:30 PM »
Nice article. Wish he would to into account players who were ranked outside of the top 100, such as Philthy Greene
*wipes ketchup from his eyes* - I guess Heinz sight isn’t 20/20.

NYCoffey

  • *****
  • 1260
Re: Reranking the class of 2011
« Reply #2 on: June 06, 2012, 12:45:19 PM »
He has one but it only lists 20 players. no Phil.

http://www.basketballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=2335

Dan

  • *****
  • 1220
Re: Reranking the class of 2011
« Reply #3 on: June 09, 2012, 01:32:52 AM »
Garrett was also listed as being impressive in limited time and moved from #99 to #56.  According to Drew Cannon, all St. John's players in the top 100 exceeded expectations if they actually played NCAA basketball that year (lost two guys to prep, one has since re-committed) except for Pointer, but he didn't slide too far back.
« Last Edit: June 09, 2012, 01:33:57 AM by Dan »

ras

  • *****
  • 2091
Re: Reranking the class of 2011
« Reply #4 on: June 09, 2012, 10:14:37 AM »
Branch slipped a lot and was called a tumnover machine. Hopefully that will change w exp and our coaching.

crgreen

  • *****
  • 2185
Re: Reranking the class of 2011
« Reply #5 on: June 09, 2012, 04:44:09 PM »
Branch slipped a lot and was called a tumnover machine. Hopefully that will change w exp and our coaching.

Weird take.  Jamal played 20 minutes a game, and committed 2.2 turnovers per game.   Not GREAT, but hardly a turnover machine.