im Crews has a .516 winning percentage as a division 1 head coach. Our current staff has a .364 winning percentage. So after carrying the one, it appears that Crews would be a major upgrade than whoever he'd replace on the current staff.
Maybe he would. I have no idea, having never heard of him before yesterday. Maybe his 59–140 record at Army was a fluke. Maybe you watched a lot of Army basketball 20 years ago and came away impressed with his basketball acumen, an acumen belied by his record, so you know he knows his Xs and Os. Maybe a .500 record after a 30 year career in which he lost more games than he won nearly half the time (13 of 29) comprises a big time assistant's resume. But on paper he seems pretty mediocre.
But again, your logic is that even though Rhode Island is better than St John's in every facet of basketball this year, St John's has better players and Danny Hurley is not good enough to coach here. Shows what we're dealing with
Now you're being a silly billy. I said nothing of the kind. You said "After [Ponds] the next 4 or 5 best players belong to URI." I disagreed, because if RI has 5 players better than Justin Simon and they're not in the top ten they should fire Hurley. Then you started jabbering about advanced isometrics or whatever, which you believed proved that Mike Daum of South Dakota State had a better year than Kemba Walker the year Walker single handedly led Uconn to the national championship. I disagree again. Because I have eyes.
Idle question: If KenPom had advanced cybermetrics proving that Lena Dunham was better looking than Mila Kunis would you start jerking off during Girls? Because I wouldn't, I 'd stick to That 70s Show.
And finally I've never seen Danny Hurley coach and don't recall expressing an opinion about his fitness as a coach. If it makes you feel better I'd happily welcome him as an assistant if the choice is between him and Jim Crews.