Who are you voting for..?

Quote from: Foad on November 06, 2016, 04:15:59 PM

Quote from: Scheppy on November 06, 2016, 08:41:11 AM

America needs a president like Trump to make America great again.

He can teach the Americans how you can file bankruptcy five times and still be called a financial genius,
On your tax return you can file a loss of 910 million dollars and still be worth billions.
Claim that you know more than the generals and still make sure you can afford serving the country
John McClain not a war hero because war hero's don't get capture coming from a man that hid from serving the country
Doesn't like Mexicans because Salma Hayek didn't want to go out with him
Make wearing a white sheet on your head popular
Make sure any reporters or people with any type of handicap don't have the right to ask anybody any type of questions

If Scheppy's endorsement does not cause anyone to change their mind I don't know what will.

Scheppy is turning me into a Syracuse fan

Quote from: mjmaherjr on November 06, 2016, 07:12:59 PM

Quote from: redslope on November 06, 2016, 06:40:27 PM

Quote from: mjmaherjr on November 06, 2016, 06:08:38 PM

Here if the thing about this thread. Every time poison has asked for proof he has gotten it. But he doesn't even think the wikileaks are real even though there has basically no denial from gems because they know they were hacked and they are all true. All you get is the change the subject line that the Russians did it

Well if you are saying the Russians hacked your email then you are saying your emails are true because if they weren't then the Russians couldn't have hacked them

Newsweek reporter Karl Eichenwald (spelling) wrote an article recently entitled "I am Sidney Blumenthal".  It seems that one of the hacked emails released by WikiLeaks attributed information to Blumenthal a friend of HRC.  THe problem was that the email referred to an article that was actually written by Karl.  17 US military and civilian agencies have said that the Russians did hack the files.  Further, WikiLeals is not a "white Knight" but an anarchist group whose leader is an accused/indicted rapist who does not have the guts to face the 2 women who accuse him of raping them.  Much can be done with emails by hackers--that is simple stuff compared to shutting down power grids as we did in the Iraq war.

Has Podesta outright said he didnt write the stuff or did he use legalese in changing the subject. How about Hillary ? Did she come out and say she didnt write any of the stuff ?

Why was Shultz canned on the eve of the convention ? Russians made that up ?

more coming out

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-06/doug-band-accuses-chelsea-using-clinton-foundation-money-pay-her-wedding

so what if Podesta wrote the emails--they were STOLEN.  This is exactly what happened in Watergate which may have been before your time because what was stolen was paper documents from like the snail mail era.  A theft is a theft is a theft.

Quote from: redslope on November 06, 2016, 08:21:13 PM

Quote from: mjmaherjr on November 06, 2016, 07:12:59 PM

Quote from: redslope on November 06, 2016, 06:40:27 PM

Quote from: mjmaherjr on November 06, 2016, 06:08:38 PM

Here if the thing about this thread. Every time poison has asked for proof he has gotten it. But he doesn't even think the wikileaks are real even though there has basically no denial from gems because they know they were hacked and they are all true. All you get is the change the subject line that the Russians did it

Well if you are saying the Russians hacked your email then you are saying your emails are true because if they weren't then the Russians couldn't have hacked them

Newsweek reporter Karl Eichenwald (spelling) wrote an article recently entitled "I am Sidney Blumenthal".  It seems that one of the hacked emails released by WikiLeaks attributed information to Blumenthal a friend of HRC.  THe problem was that the email referred to an article that was actually written by Karl.  17 US military and civilian agencies have said that the Russians did hack the files.  Further, WikiLeals is not a "white Knight" but an anarchist group whose leader is an accused/indicted rapist who does not have the guts to face the 2 women who accuse him of raping them.  Much can be done with emails by hackers--that is simple stuff compared to shutting down power grids as we did in the Iraq war.

Has Podesta outright said he didnt write the stuff or did he use legalese in changing the subject. How about Hillary ? Did she come out and say she didnt write any of the stuff ?

Why was Shultz canned on the eve of the convention ? Russians made that up ?

more coming out

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-06/doug-band-accuses-chelsea-using-clinton-foundation-money-pay-her-wedding

so what if Podesta wrote the emails--they were STOLEN.  This is exactly what happened in Watergate which may have been before your time because what was stolen was paper documents from like the snail mail era.  A theft is a theft is a theft.

Just because the emails were stolen doesn't mean you cover your eyes or can't be appalled by what's in them. You can be anti-wikileaks but still be disgusted by what's in the emails that they are releasing

48 hours or so until we know who the next lousy President of the U.S. is, maybe. 

I asked for a source. A real source. Not some blog. Nice try.

so what if Podesta wrote the emails--they were STOLEN. This is exactly what happened in Watergate

Come on buddy. Stay on topic now.

There are only two people that know more than the military Trump and Foad.
Foad thanks for your long pointless points about politics.
Nobody will check you facts because you go and on and post about nothing.
I know who you  must be the person Trump makes fun of in commercial.
Thanks for the history lesson if anybody has trouble sleeping maybe they should read your post that will put them to sleep.
If anybody needs a fact checker they can go to foadass.com - he knows everything about nothing

Quote from: Poison on November 06, 2016, 05:25:45 PM

Come on buddy. Stay on topic now.

You're voting for a woman whose husband ran for office proudly waving a confederate flag as a son of the south. Which makes you no better than a Klansman yourself. Sorry, but those are the rules, if you don't believe me ask your pal David Duke.

Little known fact: David Duke won the democratic vice presidential primary in New Hampshire in 1988. You being a democrat and all I guess that makes you a Duke supporter doesn't it. I'm beginning to sense a pattern.

Quote from: redslope on November 06, 2016, 08:21:13 PM

Quote from: mjmaherjr on November 06, 2016, 07:12:59 PM

Quote from: redslope on November 06, 2016, 06:40:27 PM

Quote from: mjmaherjr on November 06, 2016, 06:08:38 PM

Here if the thing about this thread. Every time poison has asked for proof he has gotten it. But he doesn't even think the wikileaks are real even though there has basically no denial from gems because they know they were hacked and they are all true. All you get is the change the subject line that the Russians did it

Well if you are saying the Russians hacked your email then you are saying your emails are true because if they weren't then the Russians couldn't have hacked them

Newsweek reporter Karl Eichenwald (spelling) wrote an article recently entitled "I am Sidney Blumenthal".  It seems that one of the hacked emails released by WikiLeaks attributed information to Blumenthal a friend of HRC.  THe problem was that the email referred to an article that was actually written by Karl.  17 US military and civilian agencies have said that the Russians did hack the files.  Further, WikiLeals is not a "white Knight" but an anarchist group whose leader is an accused/indicted rapist who does not have the guts to face the 2 women who accuse him of raping them.  Much can be done with emails by hackers--that is simple stuff compared to shutting down power grids as we did in the Iraq war.

Has Podesta outright said he didnt write the stuff or did he use legalese in changing the subject. How about Hillary ? Did she come out and say she didnt write any of the stuff ?

Why was Shultz canned on the eve of the convention ? Russians made that up ?

more coming out

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-06/doug-band-accuses-chelsea-using-clinton-foundation-money-pay-her-wedding

so what if Podesta wrote the emails--they were STOLEN.  This is exactly what happened in Watergate which may have been before your time because what was stolen was paper documents from like the snail mail era.  A theft is a theft is a theft.

Just because the emails were stolen doesn't mean you cover your eyes or can't be appalled by what's in them. You can be anti-wikileaks but still be disgusted by what's in the emails that they are releasing

48 hours or so until we know who the next lousy President of the U.S. is, maybe. 

Quote from: mjmaherjr on November 06, 2016, 07:12:59 PM

Quote from: redslope on November 06, 2016, 06:40:27 PM

Quote from: mjmaherjr on November 06, 2016, 06:08:38 PM

Here if the thing about this thread. Every time poison has asked for proof he has gotten it. But he doesn't even think the wikileaks are real even though there has basically no denial from gems because they know they were hacked and they are all true. All you get is the change the subject line that the Russians did it

Well if you are saying the Russians hacked your email then you are saying your emails are true because if they weren't then the Russians couldn't have hacked them

Newsweek reporter Karl Eichenwald (spelling) wrote an article recently entitled "I am Sidney Blumenthal".  It seems that one of the hacked emails released by WikiLeaks attributed information to Blumenthal a friend of HRC.  THe problem was that the email referred to an article that was actually written by Karl.  17 US military and civilian agencies have said that the Russians did hack the files.  Further, WikiLeals is not a "white Knight" but an anarchist group whose leader is an accused/indicted rapist who does not have the guts to face the 2 women who accuse him of raping them.  Much can be done with emails by hackers--that is simple stuff compared to shutting down power grids as we did in the Iraq war.

Has Podesta outright said he didnt write the stuff or did he use legalese in changing the subject. How about Hillary ? Did she come out and say she didnt write any of the stuff ?

Why was Shultz canned on the eve of the convention ? Russians made that up ?

more coming out

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-06/doug-band-accuses-chelsea-using-clinton-foundation-money-pay-her-wedding

so what if Podesta wrote the emails--they were STOLEN.  This is exactly what happened in Watergate which may have been before your time because what was stolen was paper documents from like the snail mail era.  A theft is a theft is a theft.

Quote from: redslope on November 06, 2016, 08:21:13 PM

Quote from: mjmaherjr on November 06, 2016, 07:12:59 PM

Quote from: redslope on November 06, 2016, 06:40:27 PM

Quote from: mjmaherjr on November 06, 2016, 06:08:38 PM

Here if the thing about this thread. Every time poison has asked for proof he has gotten it. But he doesn't even think the wikileaks are real even though there has basically no denial from gems because they know they were hacked and they are all true. All you get is the change the subject line that the Russians did it

Well if you are saying the Russians hacked your email then you are saying your emails are true because if they weren't then the Russians couldn't have hacked them

Newsweek reporter Karl Eichenwald (spelling) wrote an article recently entitled "I am Sidney Blumenthal".  It seems that one of the hacked emails released by WikiLeaks attributed information to Blumenthal a friend of HRC.  THe problem was that the email referred to an article that was actually written by Karl.  17 US military and civilian agencies have said that the Russians did hack the files.  Further, WikiLeals is not a "white Knight" but an anarchist group whose leader is an accused/indicted rapist who does not have the guts to face the 2 women who accuse him of raping them.  Much can be done with emails by hackers--that is simple stuff compared to shutting down power grids as we did in the Iraq war.

Has Podesta outright said he didnt write the stuff or did he use legalese in changing the subject. How about Hillary ? Did she come out and say she didnt write any of the stuff ?

Why was Shultz canned on the eve of the convention ? Russians made that up ?

more coming out

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-06/doug-band-accuses-chelsea-using-clinton-foundation-money-pay-her-wedding

so what if Podesta wrote the emails--they were STOLEN.  This is exactly what happened in Watergate which may have been before your time because what was stolen was paper documents from like the snail mail era.  A theft is a theft is a theft.

I'm going to assume you were joking instead of permanently labeling you a nice person.