Binghamton - Player of the Game

  • 8 replies
  • 949 views

desco80

  • *****
  • 5072
Binghamton - Player of the Game
« on: November 15, 2016, 12:04:45 PM »
Game #2 ....   I was at the giants game so I'm abstaining until I watch this game on dvr tonight.

But it looks like there were 2 standouts

Re: Binghamton - Player of the Game
« Reply #1 on: November 15, 2016, 01:02:46 PM »
I chose Ponds, but you really couldn't go wrong with either one of the starting guards.

Re: Binghamton - Player of the Game
« Reply #2 on: November 15, 2016, 01:07:19 PM »
Loved LoVett and they were both great so went with the statistical leader and Ponds 10 boards clinched vote.

Re: Binghamton - Player of the Game
« Reply #3 on: November 15, 2016, 01:33:34 PM »
Close but agree w/ Celtics11.

Ponds gets edge due to better 3 pt % and leading in rebounds.

Re: Binghamton - Player of the Game
« Reply #4 on: November 15, 2016, 02:35:27 PM »
A double double from a 6 foot guard?  Not too shabby.

TONYD3

  • *****
  • 5578
Re: Binghamton - Player of the Game
« Reply #5 on: November 15, 2016, 02:50:16 PM »
Ponds was great, but it has to be Lovett . Can't win without a quarterback.

ras

  • *****
  • 2091
Re: Binghamton - Player of the Game
« Reply #6 on: November 15, 2016, 03:17:18 PM »
Both played great. I'll give the edge to Ponds this game. They feed off each other.

Re: Binghamton - Player of the Game
« Reply #7 on: November 15, 2016, 04:05:10 PM »
Ponds was great, but it has to be Lovett . Can't win without a quarterback.

Who had the best all around game? Ponds.

redslope

  • *****
  • 1823
Re: Binghamton - Player of the Game
« Reply #8 on: November 15, 2016, 06:19:03 PM »
Both played great. I'll give the edge to Ponds this game. They feed off each other.

Maybe it is better to classify them as a "coupled entry" in horse racing terms as 1 and 1A each game.