DePaul

  • 169 replies
  • 14120 views

TONYD3

  • *****
  • 5578
DePaul
« on: December 29, 2016, 10:11:41 PM »
Do we have a chance?

Re: DePaul
« Reply #1 on: December 29, 2016, 10:12:11 PM »
Lol good job

boo3

  • *****
  • 6816
Re: DePaul
« Reply #2 on: December 29, 2016, 10:12:31 PM »
Yes ..

TONYD3

  • *****
  • 5578
Re: DePaul
« Reply #3 on: December 29, 2016, 10:16:18 PM »

Re: DePaul
« Reply #4 on: December 29, 2016, 10:37:10 PM »
Do we have a chance?
No because we are young and now have to learn how to avoid the big let down especially against DePaul.  ;)

boo3

  • *****
  • 6816
Re: DePaul
« Reply #5 on: December 29, 2016, 10:51:08 PM »
Wouldn't come as a surprise..usually how these things work...

Let's enjoy this one though...great win

Re: DePaul
« Reply #6 on: December 29, 2016, 11:21:45 PM »
Cain and Garrett can play. Other than that, hand farts.

Going in expecting  a win.

TONYD3

  • *****
  • 5578
Re: DePaul
« Reply #7 on: December 29, 2016, 11:28:11 PM »
Cain and Garrett can play. Other than that, hand farts.

Going in expecting  a win.
DePaul was absolutely awful in Vegas. I would have said they were worse then us before today. They looked ok yesterday. Need to stop garret. Don't let him penetrate. Force them into 3's.
« Last Edit: December 29, 2016, 11:38:08 PM by TONYD3 »

Dan

  • *****
  • 1220
Re: DePaul
« Reply #8 on: December 29, 2016, 11:42:10 PM »
Trap game!!

Re: DePaul
« Reply #9 on: December 29, 2016, 11:58:17 PM »
What he said. If they are smart they will use their size to live in the lane. Also the kid Mccallum has played well for them.

Cain and Garrett can play. Other than that, hand farts.

Going in expecting  a win.



MCNPA

  • *****
  • 5975
Re: DePaul
« Reply #10 on: December 30, 2016, 08:00:35 AM »
Wanna be a good team? There's no time for "trap" games.   Those games are only an excuse for top teams that drop one unexpectedly,...not us.   We should come out wanting and ready to destroy DePaul.

Re: DePaul
« Reply #11 on: December 30, 2016, 08:23:41 AM »
We are too young and not good enough to expect an easy win on the road.  I'll take a 1 point win, but I won't jump off the bandwagon if we lose.

Poison

  • *****
  • 16896
Re: DePaul
« Reply #12 on: December 30, 2016, 08:34:28 AM »
We are too young and not good enough to expect an easy win on the road.  I'll take a 1 point win, but I won't jump off the bandwagon if we lose.

We should never expect an easy anything.

derk

  • *****
  • 1360
Re: DePaul
« Reply #13 on: December 30, 2016, 09:22:11 AM »
Wanna be a good team? There's no time for "trap" games.   Those games are only an excuse for top teams that drop one unexpectedly,...not us.   We should come out wanting and ready to destroy DePaul.

Yes but we're not a good team. Our two big wins came when we shot the lights out. Not going to happen every game.

Poison

  • *****
  • 16896
Re: DePaul
« Reply #14 on: December 30, 2016, 09:24:31 AM »
Wanna be a good team? There's no time for "trap" games.   Those games are only an excuse for top teams that drop one unexpectedly,...not us.   We should come out wanting and ready to destroy DePaul.

Yes but we're not a good team. Our two big wins came when we shot the lights out. Not going to happen every game.

4-16 from 3 last night. Won because Ponds and Ahmed created and played aggressive basketball.

derk

  • *****
  • 1360
Re: DePaul
« Reply #15 on: December 30, 2016, 09:34:23 AM »
And shot well and very timely.I

Wods317

  • *****
  • 1713
Re: DePaul
« Reply #16 on: December 30, 2016, 09:47:03 AM »
If we are going to win more then just a few conference games you would figure we have to sweep DePaul. Winning any conference game on the road is tough but seeing how well we have played the last couple games I would be pretty disappointed with a loss. I personally think confidence is sky high now and the take care of DePaul in a relatively close game.

MCNPA

  • *****
  • 5975
Re: DePaul
« Reply #17 on: December 30, 2016, 11:59:33 AM »
We have to play with complete effort like we played last two games.  That entails at least solid defense, and no major drops in energy or lapses into stupidity.  This team seems to have a good quality though, which is they generally seem to have been able to mitigate that with exception of the Penn State loss.  I also thought Mullin's timeouts were very timely and well placed.  Each was called after a mini-run by Butler, and we came out after timeouts and executed to bring the game back.  Whatever happened in the timeouts, it worked to settle us and re-focus.

DePaul just requires a solid 2 halves by our team, and solid gameplay by the coaches.  We won against Butler in one of our worse shooting games, and in a game where Butler didn't play poorly and allow us to escape.  Good team effort and we can compete.

Re: DePaul
« Reply #18 on: December 30, 2016, 12:10:51 PM »

DePaul just requires a solid 2 halves by our team, and solid gameplay by the coaches.  We won against Butler in one of our worse shooting games, and in a game where Butler didn't play poorly and allow us to escape.  Good team effort and we can compete.

Assuming you mean our 3 point shooting was bad, overall shot 54%. Bash and Ponds hit a few tough 3's at important stages but otherwise everyone did a good job of looking for higher percentage shots. Ponds in particular had a number of nice shots moving towards the basket.

redslope

  • *****
  • 1823
Re: DePaul
« Reply #19 on: December 30, 2016, 12:16:14 PM »
DePaul played Nova tough at Nova--don't overlook them.  We need to get our touch back from 3pt land if we are to best them.