Creighton

  • 405 replies
  • 35175 views
Re: Creighton
« Reply #220 on: January 04, 2017, 09:40:59 PM »
I'm most interested to see how Lovett comes out for the 2nd half after getting his lunch eaten. See what kind of heart he has

Johnny23

  • *****
  • 3277
Re: Creighton
« Reply #221 on: January 04, 2017, 09:41:19 PM »
28 points in the paint. Domination close to the hoop.

We needed to shoot close to 50% from deep to have any shot tonight. 2-13 won't cut it against the big boys.

Yup and no more walking the ball up the court. Run the fckn ball

Agreed. Go right at them.

Re: Creighton
« Reply #222 on: January 04, 2017, 09:41:26 PM »
So still not worried about Patton guys?
Follow Johnny Jungle on Twitter at @Johnny_Jungle

Re: Creighton
« Reply #223 on: January 04, 2017, 09:42:22 PM »
The difference is that they got a decent number of easy baskets and clean looks and we have to work so hard for every one of our points. This is what happens when one team runs offensive sets and the other plays 1 on 1 ball

How many times is our pg going to try to low dribble through the double team? It's a turnover 98% of the time

Re: Creighton
« Reply #224 on: January 04, 2017, 09:43:20 PM »
So still not worried about Patton guys?

Our bigs are afraid of him. So soft

goredmen

  • *****
  • 5066
Re: Creighton
« Reply #225 on: January 04, 2017, 09:44:16 PM »
The difference is that they got a decent number of easy baskets and clean looks and we have to work so hard for every one of our points. This is what happens when one team runs offensive sets and the other plays 1 on 1 ball

How many times is our pg going to try to low dribble through the double team? It's a turnover 98% of the time

Drives me crazy

Re: Creighton
« Reply #226 on: January 04, 2017, 09:45:14 PM »
So still not worried about Patton guys?

Our bigs are afraid of him. So soft

He's just better than 'em.  Our bigs are just shotblockers.  They're not particularly the "dig deep" defensive types.

Marillac

  • *****
  • 11224
Re: Creighton
« Reply #227 on: January 04, 2017, 09:47:55 PM »
So still not worried about Patton guys?
I'm only afraid of the guy that keeps drawing his defender and putting then ball in his hands two feet from the basket.

Re: Creighton
« Reply #228 on: January 04, 2017, 09:48:29 PM »
I'm most interested to see how Lovett comes out for the 2nd half after getting his lunch eaten. See what kind of heart he has

Ponds got his lunch taken
*wipes ketchup from his eyes* - I guess Heinz sight isn’t 20/20.

Re: Creighton
« Reply #229 on: January 04, 2017, 09:49:28 PM »
We gotta play defense for 40 minutes, and play smartly.

Re: Creighton
« Reply #230 on: January 04, 2017, 09:49:33 PM »
I think Creighton is going to win the Big East

goredmen

  • *****
  • 5066
Re: Creighton
« Reply #231 on: January 04, 2017, 09:49:37 PM »
So still not worried about Patton guys?
I'm only afraid of the guy that keeps drawing his defender and putting then ball in his hands two feet from the basket.

He scored 3 baskets of his 6 baskets one on one on the block. One on Yakwe, two on Owens. These weren't undefended shots, he's just better than our bigs are. But don't worry, he's just a frosh that averages 13 and 6. Nothing to worry about. Owens can handle him

Re: Creighton
« Reply #232 on: January 04, 2017, 09:51:14 PM »
Ponds last guy up the court on d that last break

Re: Creighton
« Reply #233 on: January 04, 2017, 09:53:09 PM »
I think Creighton is going to win the Big East

Villanova will win it again.

Re: Creighton
« Reply #234 on: January 04, 2017, 09:53:17 PM »
The SJU dance team needs an upgrade

Marillac

  • *****
  • 11224
Re: Creighton
« Reply #235 on: January 04, 2017, 09:53:35 PM »
Yakwe on Patton to start the half? I'm turning this one off now. No good will come from watching this half. 

Re: Creighton
« Reply #236 on: January 04, 2017, 09:54:10 PM »
I think Creighton is going to win the Big East

Villanova will win it again.

No argument from me, I'm just more impressed with Creighton at the moment. That could change in 2 mins though lol. Bipolar Baldi

Re: Creighton
« Reply #237 on: January 04, 2017, 09:54:11 PM »
Patton has gone to the line 2 times or less in 9 games this year. Body him up and live with the results. Bigger things to worry about.

He has two moves....goes to the up-and-under by default. He'll hook it over or smaller defenders like he did to Paschall of Nova or around stiffs. Everything else is lobs, dunks, or open jumpers.

Of course, I've now set the stage for his 40 and 18 coming out party.

In 25 minutes he is averaging 13 and 6.5 shooting 74%. No that is not a mistype 74%
And though averaging 6.5 boards in 25 mins in not spectacular, as a team Creighton is shooting 54%. Yes 54% So basically there are hardly any offensive rebounds to get.
And just to put numbers in context Ewing as a Frosh 12.7 and 7.5. No that he is anywhere close to Pat but based off the arguments on here about  Patton, if there was a SJU board in 1982 the 1982 version of some of you would be posting why worry about Ewing only averaging 12.7 and 7.5

You are a pro at taking something that isnt even there and running with it. No one is saying that he is not good.

"He's a freshman averaging 13 and 6...let's not get carried away."

"Patton is just a frosh and I don't think he's big enough to bully Owens like many of the jacked guys he's struggled against. "

 "Patton is good, but he's not a phenom by any stretch....he looks like a slightly better version of Sima to me. The way you beat Owens  this year is by going through him. Patton has scored on finesse moves thus far."

"Ha! He moves like a robot. I could see him being a backup if he polished up his game, but this is not the type of talent some of you think. His current draft projection will slide down to second round with time. "

" Best big averaging 6 RPG? GTFOH."

I really could go on


Sima killing us

Re: Creighton
« Reply #238 on: January 04, 2017, 09:55:12 PM »
Yakwe on Patton to start the half? I'm turning this one off now. No good will come from watching this half. 

Yep.  I'm about to do the same.

Re: Creighton
« Reply #239 on: January 04, 2017, 09:55:18 PM »
This is over. Ponds has given up defensively