Quote from: we are sju on January 04, 2017, 03:34:40 PMQuote from: Amaseinyourface2 on January 04, 2017, 03:28:47 PMQuote from: we are sju on January 04, 2017, 03:24:30 PMQuote from: Amaseinyourface2 on January 04, 2017, 03:22:08 PMQuote from: we are sju on January 04, 2017, 03:18:33 PMQuote from: Amaseinyourface2 on January 04, 2017, 02:59:19 PMQuote from: we are sju on January 04, 2017, 02:13:12 PMQuote from: Marillac on January 04, 2017, 02:05:53 PMQuote from: Amaseinyourface2 on January 04, 2017, 01:04:06 PMPatton has gone to the line 2 times or less in 9 games this year. Body him up and live with the results. Bigger things to worry about. He has two moves....goes to the up-and-under by default. He'll hook it over or smaller defenders like he did to Paschall of Nova or around stiffs. Everything else is lobs, dunks, or open jumpers. Of course, I've now set the stage for his 40 and 18 coming out party. In 25 minutes he is averaging 13 and 6.5 shooting 74%. No that is not a mistype 74%And though averaging 6.5 boards in 25 mins in not spectacular, as a team Creighton is shooting 54%. Yes 54% So basically there are hardly any offensive rebounds to get.And just to put numbers in context Ewing as a Frosh 12.7 and 7.5. No that he is anywhere close to Pat but based off the arguments on here about Patton, if there was a SJU board in 1982 the 1982 version of some of you would be posting why worry about Ewing only averaging 12.7 and 7.5You are a pro at taking something that isnt even there and running with it. No one is saying that he is not good. "He's a freshman averaging 13 and 6...let's not get carried away.""Patton is just a frosh and I don't think he's big enough to bully Owens like many of the jacked guys he's struggled against. " "Patton is good, but he's not a phenom by any stretch....he looks like a slightly better version of Sima to me. The way you beat Owens this year is by going through him. Patton has scored on finesse moves thus far.""Ha! He moves like a robot. I could see him being a backup if he polished up his game, but this is not the type of talent some of you think. His current draft projection will slide down to second round with time. "" Best big averaging 6 RPG? GTFOH."I really could go onMade by one poster who is just trying to say he isnt our biggest concern. Oh you mean the poster who I was responding to???"but based off the arguments on here about Patton, if there was a SJU board in 1982 the 1982 version of some of you would be posting why worry about Ewing only averaging 12.7 and 7.5"Full disclosure I think you're one of the better posters here. You just have a knack for picking small tidbits, generalizing them across a large group of the board, and then perpetrating those same arguments by starting threads and continuously bringing it up. Full disclosure ever since my buddy Marillac (who I like but sometimes his basketball tastes are worse than his taste in UCONN women) said he thinks it was a good idea for Lovett not to start, I made it my mission to heckle him whenever he posts something silly.So yes should have just said Marillac instead of posters, but was initially including you but after further thought I gave you a pass on Delgado who is better than Patton right now but I think we could have more problems with Patton just based on size.I simply said "I don't mind" Lovett coming off the bench temporarily since we've started all but two games strong and he's going to play 30+ mpg anyway. You imputed the rest to me to complete that straw manPatton is a good player, but he's not Anthony Davis. He just happens to be the kind of big that Owens can (likely) handle. He had to redshirt last year because he was too frail. He hasn't gone through anyone yet in his career, and that's how you punish Owens. As for invoking Ewing, that's just crazy. GG Achuiwa averaged 10 and 6 in 29 minutes his first year. Watson and Foster are the guys that you need to stop to win.
Quote from: Amaseinyourface2 on January 04, 2017, 03:28:47 PMQuote from: we are sju on January 04, 2017, 03:24:30 PMQuote from: Amaseinyourface2 on January 04, 2017, 03:22:08 PMQuote from: we are sju on January 04, 2017, 03:18:33 PMQuote from: Amaseinyourface2 on January 04, 2017, 02:59:19 PMQuote from: we are sju on January 04, 2017, 02:13:12 PMQuote from: Marillac on January 04, 2017, 02:05:53 PMQuote from: Amaseinyourface2 on January 04, 2017, 01:04:06 PMPatton has gone to the line 2 times or less in 9 games this year. Body him up and live with the results. Bigger things to worry about. He has two moves....goes to the up-and-under by default. He'll hook it over or smaller defenders like he did to Paschall of Nova or around stiffs. Everything else is lobs, dunks, or open jumpers. Of course, I've now set the stage for his 40 and 18 coming out party. In 25 minutes he is averaging 13 and 6.5 shooting 74%. No that is not a mistype 74%And though averaging 6.5 boards in 25 mins in not spectacular, as a team Creighton is shooting 54%. Yes 54% So basically there are hardly any offensive rebounds to get.And just to put numbers in context Ewing as a Frosh 12.7 and 7.5. No that he is anywhere close to Pat but based off the arguments on here about Patton, if there was a SJU board in 1982 the 1982 version of some of you would be posting why worry about Ewing only averaging 12.7 and 7.5You are a pro at taking something that isnt even there and running with it. No one is saying that he is not good. "He's a freshman averaging 13 and 6...let's not get carried away.""Patton is just a frosh and I don't think he's big enough to bully Owens like many of the jacked guys he's struggled against. " "Patton is good, but he's not a phenom by any stretch....he looks like a slightly better version of Sima to me. The way you beat Owens this year is by going through him. Patton has scored on finesse moves thus far.""Ha! He moves like a robot. I could see him being a backup if he polished up his game, but this is not the type of talent some of you think. His current draft projection will slide down to second round with time. "" Best big averaging 6 RPG? GTFOH."I really could go onMade by one poster who is just trying to say he isnt our biggest concern. Oh you mean the poster who I was responding to???"but based off the arguments on here about Patton, if there was a SJU board in 1982 the 1982 version of some of you would be posting why worry about Ewing only averaging 12.7 and 7.5"Full disclosure I think you're one of the better posters here. You just have a knack for picking small tidbits, generalizing them across a large group of the board, and then perpetrating those same arguments by starting threads and continuously bringing it up. Full disclosure ever since my buddy Marillac (who I like but sometimes his basketball tastes are worse than his taste in UCONN women) said he thinks it was a good idea for Lovett not to start, I made it my mission to heckle him whenever he posts something silly.So yes should have just said Marillac instead of posters, but was initially including you but after further thought I gave you a pass on Delgado who is better than Patton right now but I think we could have more problems with Patton just based on size.
Quote from: we are sju on January 04, 2017, 03:24:30 PMQuote from: Amaseinyourface2 on January 04, 2017, 03:22:08 PMQuote from: we are sju on January 04, 2017, 03:18:33 PMQuote from: Amaseinyourface2 on January 04, 2017, 02:59:19 PMQuote from: we are sju on January 04, 2017, 02:13:12 PMQuote from: Marillac on January 04, 2017, 02:05:53 PMQuote from: Amaseinyourface2 on January 04, 2017, 01:04:06 PMPatton has gone to the line 2 times or less in 9 games this year. Body him up and live with the results. Bigger things to worry about. He has two moves....goes to the up-and-under by default. He'll hook it over or smaller defenders like he did to Paschall of Nova or around stiffs. Everything else is lobs, dunks, or open jumpers. Of course, I've now set the stage for his 40 and 18 coming out party. In 25 minutes he is averaging 13 and 6.5 shooting 74%. No that is not a mistype 74%And though averaging 6.5 boards in 25 mins in not spectacular, as a team Creighton is shooting 54%. Yes 54% So basically there are hardly any offensive rebounds to get.And just to put numbers in context Ewing as a Frosh 12.7 and 7.5. No that he is anywhere close to Pat but based off the arguments on here about Patton, if there was a SJU board in 1982 the 1982 version of some of you would be posting why worry about Ewing only averaging 12.7 and 7.5You are a pro at taking something that isnt even there and running with it. No one is saying that he is not good. "He's a freshman averaging 13 and 6...let's not get carried away.""Patton is just a frosh and I don't think he's big enough to bully Owens like many of the jacked guys he's struggled against. " "Patton is good, but he's not a phenom by any stretch....he looks like a slightly better version of Sima to me. The way you beat Owens this year is by going through him. Patton has scored on finesse moves thus far.""Ha! He moves like a robot. I could see him being a backup if he polished up his game, but this is not the type of talent some of you think. His current draft projection will slide down to second round with time. "" Best big averaging 6 RPG? GTFOH."I really could go onMade by one poster who is just trying to say he isnt our biggest concern. Oh you mean the poster who I was responding to???"but based off the arguments on here about Patton, if there was a SJU board in 1982 the 1982 version of some of you would be posting why worry about Ewing only averaging 12.7 and 7.5"Full disclosure I think you're one of the better posters here. You just have a knack for picking small tidbits, generalizing them across a large group of the board, and then perpetrating those same arguments by starting threads and continuously bringing it up.
Quote from: Amaseinyourface2 on January 04, 2017, 03:22:08 PMQuote from: we are sju on January 04, 2017, 03:18:33 PMQuote from: Amaseinyourface2 on January 04, 2017, 02:59:19 PMQuote from: we are sju on January 04, 2017, 02:13:12 PMQuote from: Marillac on January 04, 2017, 02:05:53 PMQuote from: Amaseinyourface2 on January 04, 2017, 01:04:06 PMPatton has gone to the line 2 times or less in 9 games this year. Body him up and live with the results. Bigger things to worry about. He has two moves....goes to the up-and-under by default. He'll hook it over or smaller defenders like he did to Paschall of Nova or around stiffs. Everything else is lobs, dunks, or open jumpers. Of course, I've now set the stage for his 40 and 18 coming out party. In 25 minutes he is averaging 13 and 6.5 shooting 74%. No that is not a mistype 74%And though averaging 6.5 boards in 25 mins in not spectacular, as a team Creighton is shooting 54%. Yes 54% So basically there are hardly any offensive rebounds to get.And just to put numbers in context Ewing as a Frosh 12.7 and 7.5. No that he is anywhere close to Pat but based off the arguments on here about Patton, if there was a SJU board in 1982 the 1982 version of some of you would be posting why worry about Ewing only averaging 12.7 and 7.5You are a pro at taking something that isnt even there and running with it. No one is saying that he is not good. "He's a freshman averaging 13 and 6...let's not get carried away.""Patton is just a frosh and I don't think he's big enough to bully Owens like many of the jacked guys he's struggled against. " "Patton is good, but he's not a phenom by any stretch....he looks like a slightly better version of Sima to me. The way you beat Owens this year is by going through him. Patton has scored on finesse moves thus far.""Ha! He moves like a robot. I could see him being a backup if he polished up his game, but this is not the type of talent some of you think. His current draft projection will slide down to second round with time. "" Best big averaging 6 RPG? GTFOH."I really could go onMade by one poster who is just trying to say he isnt our biggest concern. Oh you mean the poster who I was responding to???
Quote from: we are sju on January 04, 2017, 03:18:33 PMQuote from: Amaseinyourface2 on January 04, 2017, 02:59:19 PMQuote from: we are sju on January 04, 2017, 02:13:12 PMQuote from: Marillac on January 04, 2017, 02:05:53 PMQuote from: Amaseinyourface2 on January 04, 2017, 01:04:06 PMPatton has gone to the line 2 times or less in 9 games this year. Body him up and live with the results. Bigger things to worry about. He has two moves....goes to the up-and-under by default. He'll hook it over or smaller defenders like he did to Paschall of Nova or around stiffs. Everything else is lobs, dunks, or open jumpers. Of course, I've now set the stage for his 40 and 18 coming out party. In 25 minutes he is averaging 13 and 6.5 shooting 74%. No that is not a mistype 74%And though averaging 6.5 boards in 25 mins in not spectacular, as a team Creighton is shooting 54%. Yes 54% So basically there are hardly any offensive rebounds to get.And just to put numbers in context Ewing as a Frosh 12.7 and 7.5. No that he is anywhere close to Pat but based off the arguments on here about Patton, if there was a SJU board in 1982 the 1982 version of some of you would be posting why worry about Ewing only averaging 12.7 and 7.5You are a pro at taking something that isnt even there and running with it. No one is saying that he is not good. "He's a freshman averaging 13 and 6...let's not get carried away.""Patton is just a frosh and I don't think he's big enough to bully Owens like many of the jacked guys he's struggled against. " "Patton is good, but he's not a phenom by any stretch....he looks like a slightly better version of Sima to me. The way you beat Owens this year is by going through him. Patton has scored on finesse moves thus far.""Ha! He moves like a robot. I could see him being a backup if he polished up his game, but this is not the type of talent some of you think. His current draft projection will slide down to second round with time. "" Best big averaging 6 RPG? GTFOH."I really could go onMade by one poster who is just trying to say he isnt our biggest concern.
Quote from: Amaseinyourface2 on January 04, 2017, 02:59:19 PMQuote from: we are sju on January 04, 2017, 02:13:12 PMQuote from: Marillac on January 04, 2017, 02:05:53 PMQuote from: Amaseinyourface2 on January 04, 2017, 01:04:06 PMPatton has gone to the line 2 times or less in 9 games this year. Body him up and live with the results. Bigger things to worry about. He has two moves....goes to the up-and-under by default. He'll hook it over or smaller defenders like he did to Paschall of Nova or around stiffs. Everything else is lobs, dunks, or open jumpers. Of course, I've now set the stage for his 40 and 18 coming out party. In 25 minutes he is averaging 13 and 6.5 shooting 74%. No that is not a mistype 74%And though averaging 6.5 boards in 25 mins in not spectacular, as a team Creighton is shooting 54%. Yes 54% So basically there are hardly any offensive rebounds to get.And just to put numbers in context Ewing as a Frosh 12.7 and 7.5. No that he is anywhere close to Pat but based off the arguments on here about Patton, if there was a SJU board in 1982 the 1982 version of some of you would be posting why worry about Ewing only averaging 12.7 and 7.5You are a pro at taking something that isnt even there and running with it. No one is saying that he is not good. "He's a freshman averaging 13 and 6...let's not get carried away.""Patton is just a frosh and I don't think he's big enough to bully Owens like many of the jacked guys he's struggled against. " "Patton is good, but he's not a phenom by any stretch....he looks like a slightly better version of Sima to me. The way you beat Owens this year is by going through him. Patton has scored on finesse moves thus far.""Ha! He moves like a robot. I could see him being a backup if he polished up his game, but this is not the type of talent some of you think. His current draft projection will slide down to second round with time. "" Best big averaging 6 RPG? GTFOH."I really could go on
Quote from: we are sju on January 04, 2017, 02:13:12 PMQuote from: Marillac on January 04, 2017, 02:05:53 PMQuote from: Amaseinyourface2 on January 04, 2017, 01:04:06 PMPatton has gone to the line 2 times or less in 9 games this year. Body him up and live with the results. Bigger things to worry about. He has two moves....goes to the up-and-under by default. He'll hook it over or smaller defenders like he did to Paschall of Nova or around stiffs. Everything else is lobs, dunks, or open jumpers. Of course, I've now set the stage for his 40 and 18 coming out party. In 25 minutes he is averaging 13 and 6.5 shooting 74%. No that is not a mistype 74%And though averaging 6.5 boards in 25 mins in not spectacular, as a team Creighton is shooting 54%. Yes 54% So basically there are hardly any offensive rebounds to get.And just to put numbers in context Ewing as a Frosh 12.7 and 7.5. No that he is anywhere close to Pat but based off the arguments on here about Patton, if there was a SJU board in 1982 the 1982 version of some of you would be posting why worry about Ewing only averaging 12.7 and 7.5You are a pro at taking something that isnt even there and running with it. No one is saying that he is not good.
Quote from: Marillac on January 04, 2017, 02:05:53 PMQuote from: Amaseinyourface2 on January 04, 2017, 01:04:06 PMPatton has gone to the line 2 times or less in 9 games this year. Body him up and live with the results. Bigger things to worry about. He has two moves....goes to the up-and-under by default. He'll hook it over or smaller defenders like he did to Paschall of Nova or around stiffs. Everything else is lobs, dunks, or open jumpers. Of course, I've now set the stage for his 40 and 18 coming out party. In 25 minutes he is averaging 13 and 6.5 shooting 74%. No that is not a mistype 74%And though averaging 6.5 boards in 25 mins in not spectacular, as a team Creighton is shooting 54%. Yes 54% So basically there are hardly any offensive rebounds to get.And just to put numbers in context Ewing as a Frosh 12.7 and 7.5. No that he is anywhere close to Pat but based off the arguments on here about Patton, if there was a SJU board in 1982 the 1982 version of some of you would be posting why worry about Ewing only averaging 12.7 and 7.5
Quote from: Amaseinyourface2 on January 04, 2017, 01:04:06 PMPatton has gone to the line 2 times or less in 9 games this year. Body him up and live with the results. Bigger things to worry about. He has two moves....goes to the up-and-under by default. He'll hook it over or smaller defenders like he did to Paschall of Nova or around stiffs. Everything else is lobs, dunks, or open jumpers. Of course, I've now set the stage for his 40 and 18 coming out party.
Patton has gone to the line 2 times or less in 9 games this year. Body him up and live with the results. Bigger things to worry about.
RF with a few threes tonight could help offset Huff who is bound to kill us.
Headed to the game tonight had a question for you guys. Can you park in the parking garage by the lacrosse field without a St. John's parking pass? Thanks.
Why do we walk the ball up after made baskets? Get it out and go