Mike Rice - here we go again

Id be all for a Kevin Ollie hire

Id be all for a Kevin Ollie hire

I would to, if only to piss off UConn fans!  That said there might be some choices with more coaching and recruiting chops... we shall see...

Bump...

done deal..?

Please God!!!!

This would be major, if true.

fingers crossed this is the real deal!

I sense that patience is for those who lose their senses, when sensing an upcoming announcement and easily lose their sensibilities over said announcement.

Bump...

Can you elaborate before Baldi states he's going to UConn.

Paultzman deleting comments and changing avatar. That could be good news or bad news.

Paultzman deleting comments and changing avatar. That could be good news or bad news.

Nothing bad

Quote from: colelatshaw2010 on May 22, 2018, 06:59:18 PM

Paultzman deleting comments and changing avatar. That could be good news or bad news.

Nothing bad

I'll take that it as good news then

Are we getting this guy? He deserves a second chance btw.

Quote from: paultzman on May 22, 2018, 09:07:54 PM

Quote from: colelatshaw2010 on May 22, 2018, 06:59:18 PM

Paultzman deleting comments and changing avatar. That could be good news or bad news.

Nothing bad

I'll take that it as good news then

🤞

I hate to be negative. But, you wouldn t be able to compare the effort that will be put into recruiting from Rice vs. Mitch. I too , am for the hiring of Rice.

Who's leaving?

I hate to be negative. But, you wouldn t be able to compare the effort that will be put into recruiting from Rice vs. Mitch. I too , am for the hiring of Rice.

Just having Mitch around and connected with the program allows us to keep his biggest contribution. He can still do that in his old role and let someone like Rice have a bigger day-by-day impact. Mitch makes a lot of $ doing talks and making appearances. It's almost certainly in his best interest to go back to his old role.

Quote from: colelatshaw2010 on May 22, 2018, 09:13:52 PM

Quote from: paultzman on May 22, 2018, 09:07:54 PM

Quote from: colelatshaw2010 on May 22, 2018, 06:59:18 PM

Paultzman deleting comments and changing avatar. That could be good news or bad news.

Nothing bad

I'll take that it as good news then

🤞

So one would assume that your bringing it up means that it is back on the table for discussion among the school, coach, and Rice. No ?

Quote from: paultzman on May 23, 2018, 08:27:14 AM

Quote from: colelatshaw2010 on May 22, 2018, 09:13:52 PM

Quote from: paultzman on May 22, 2018, 09:07:54 PM

Quote from: colelatshaw2010 on May 22, 2018, 06:59:18 PM

Paultzman deleting comments and changing avatar. That could be good news or bad news.

Nothing bad

I'll take that it as good news then

🤞

So one would assume that your bringing it up means that it is back on the table for discussion among the school, coach, and Rice. No ?

Quote from: ras on May 23, 2018, 10:25:02 AM

I hate to be negative. But, you wouldn t be able to compare the effort that will be put into recruiting from Rice vs. Mitch. I too , am for the hiring of Rice.

Just having Mitch around and connected with the program allows us to keep his biggest contribution. He can still do that in his old role and let someone like Rice have a bigger day-by-day impact. Mitch makes a lot of $ doing talks and making appearances. It's almost certainly in his best interest to go back to his old role.

Exactly

Quote from: derk on May 23, 2018, 12:15:49 PM

Quote from: paultzman on May 23, 2018, 08:27:14 AM

Quote from: colelatshaw2010 on May 22, 2018, 09:13:52 PM

Quote from: paultzman on May 22, 2018, 09:07:54 PM

Quote from: colelatshaw2010 on May 22, 2018, 06:59:18 PM

Paultzman deleting comments and changing avatar. That could be good news or bad news.

Nothing bad

I'll take that it as good news then

🤞

So one would assume that your bringing it up means that it is back on the table for discussion among the school, coach, and Rice. No ?

Quote from: Marillac on May 23, 2018, 11:40:19 AM

Quote from: ras on May 23, 2018, 10:25:02 AM

I hate to be negative. But, you wouldn t be able to compare the effort that will be put into recruiting from Rice vs. Mitch. I too , am for the hiring of Rice.

Just having Mitch around and connected with the program allows us to keep his biggest contribution. He can still do that in his old role and let someone like Rice have a bigger day-by-day impact. Mitch makes a lot of $ doing talks and making appearances. It's almost certainly in his best interest to go back to his old role.

Exactly

So if we get Mike Rice do you think this gives us a shot with Lewis/Antoine?

Quote from: paultzman on May 23, 2018, 12:21:16 PM

Quote from: derk on May 23, 2018, 12:15:49 PM

Quote from: paultzman on May 23, 2018, 08:27:14 AM

Quote from: colelatshaw2010 on May 22, 2018, 09:13:52 PM

Quote from: paultzman on May 22, 2018, 09:07:54 PM

Quote from: colelatshaw2010 on May 22, 2018, 06:59:18 PM

Paultzman deleting comments and changing avatar. That could be good news or bad news.

Nothing bad

I'll take that it as good news then

🤞

So one would assume that your bringing it up means that it is back on the table for discussion among the school, coach, and Rice. No ?

Quote from: Marillac on May 23, 2018, 11:40:19 AM

Quote from: ras on May 23, 2018, 10:25:02 AM

I hate to be negative. But, you wouldn t be able to compare the effort that will be put into recruiting from Rice vs. Mitch. I too , am for the hiring of Rice.

Just having Mitch around and connected with the program allows us to keep his biggest contribution. He can still do that in his old role and let someone like Rice have a bigger day-by-day impact. Mitch makes a lot of $ doing talks and making appearances. It's almost certainly in his best interest to go back to his old role.

Exactly

So if we get Mike Rice do you think this gives us a shot with Lewis/Antoine?

Certainly not Antoine who is likely bound to Nova imo. Aidan, Lewis & Gaffney will be challenging as well re: Rio 19 players.