I caught glimpses of Georgetown, DePaul, Creighton, Butler and Seton Hall over the weekend. We have our work cut out for ourselves.
Therein lies the rub. Many of our fans view the team in a vacuum. Sure most of our players are really good but you have to compare them to the competition. If most of our schedule was against low majors we wouldn't be pointing out our deficiencies so much.
Agree. Here they're also viewing other teams in a vacuum. It was one (or two) games for most of those teams, and you can't really judge anything. Most know Seton Hall will field a good team, and Creighton and Butler are typically teams who you can't underrate. Although, I think we'll be better than Butler.
I only saw a few possessions, but I heard DePaul wasn't so bad against Notre Dame on Saturday. I watched all of the first half of Georgetown's game yesterday, but I barely saw any of the second half, as I was watching football. They looked a bit more focus on defense, but they were still often fouling, gave up too many offensive boards, turned the ball over (they had 18), and their backcourt didn't do anything. It was all Govan and Derrickson. 15 of Derrickson's 20 points came from behind the arc. Govan missed some bunnies and was being shoved around. He also ended up with 20 points, but he probably should've had more.
Lastly, Jacksonville sucked more than your usual street walker. UAB beat them by 30 and nearly hit the century mark (scored 97 points) against Jacksonville a few nights ago. Other than our Johnnies, Georgetown has been the only Big East team I've seen at length, so far, in this early season, but I'll tune into Providence's game tonight.
Be careful of judging a team after one or two games. Even more so, against mediocre-to-poor competition. Give it, at least, a month or two. On some occasions, it's probably best to wait until conference play starts.
Regardless, my stance still stands with DePaul and Georgetown. They'll be bottom-feeders (someone has to finish last) until I see something differently.