You have a unique way of disagreeing with yourself. It’s too bad you evidently don’t believe in nuance, or you might be right and agreeable more often.
Simon is currently shooting over 50%, shot 47% last year, both well within the scientific range of “ok.” You have effectively called him unguardable when he’s in the post which apparently doesn’t qualify as “hard to defend.”
I’m sorry that you aren’t a big fan and are somehow blind to his speed length and explosiveness. These all seem undeniable to me. As I said, two things can be true—he can be more efficient and pick his spots better and still have a unique skill set for his size and athleticism.
Adorable. Now tell me how Simon "creates openings because he's so hard to defend." That language clearly refers to the perimeter, where Simon can only be labeled as completely inept. Creating openings is the exact opposite of what he does. He actually destroys openings and kills spacing. Fran said he wouldn't even guard him at all!
His shot isnt ok, or even close to it. He is given 10-12 feet to shoot open set shots and he airballs nearly a third of them. No two shots ever look the same. Looking at shooting %s in a vacuum is silly. Who have you ever seen given that much space to shoot set threes besides him and Pointer? Ponds would shoot 75% with that space.
And as far as his length and athletic ability, I literally post about that more than anyone. He's a PF and the faster he and the staff realize that the better this team will be.