6 Best Teams Circa 01'-02'

  • 34 replies
  • 4005 views

Re: 5 Best Teams Circa 98'-99'
« Reply #1 on: February 19, 2019, 01:32:46 AM »
I mean it is the Elite 8 team that was a play away from the final four but the Lavin '11 squad was screwed playing the tournament without DJ and they also got seeded lower than they should have been because of it.

It is just our luck that DJ would tear his ACL in a game we probably shouldn't have been in but were because of....incompetent refs. Wild man.

Re: 5 Best Teams Circa 98'-99'
« Reply #2 on: February 19, 2019, 09:07:24 AM »
1. Elite 8
2. 1999-2000
3. 2010-2011
4. 2014-2015

Also talent-wise 2013-2014 was solid. The problem there was no heart was in it and did not mesh incredibly well. That team had real potential if they had chemistry. They wanted no business of Robert Morris or NIT because of snub so played like it.

Re: 5 Best Teams Circa 98'-99'
« Reply #3 on: February 19, 2019, 10:12:51 AM »
I mean it is the Elite 8 team that was a play away from the final four but the Lavin '11 squad was screwed playing the tournament without DJ and they also got seeded lower than they should have been because of it.

It is just our luck that DJ would tear his ACL in a game we probably shouldn't have been in but were because of....incompetent refs. Wild man.

Lol snub? They didn’t show up against providence in the BE tourney when they had a chance.
*wipes ketchup from his eyes* - I guess Heinz sight isn’t 20/20.

Marillac

  • *****
  • 11224
Re: 5 Best Teams Circa 98'-99'
« Reply #4 on: February 19, 2019, 10:27:05 AM »
It’s not fair to include that 98-99 team in this poll.
« Last Edit: February 19, 2019, 10:27:29 AM by Marillac »

QuanMan

  • *****
  • 1744
Re: 5 Best Teams Circa 98'-99'
« Reply #5 on: February 19, 2019, 10:29:51 AM »
This year's group is special. The toughness, professionalism, and competitiveness that MH and LJF have brought them is beyond expectations. Senior leadership from Marv and Justin, and of course the superstar Shamorie. I'll put them ahead of 2015 and probably 2011, barring results.

The potential to be the best team since the Elite8 roster is there for them. It looks like they're bound for damn near 25 wins. 
Section 3
Section 116

Tha Kid

  • *****
  • 4662
Re: 5 Best Teams Circa 98'-99'
« Reply #6 on: February 19, 2019, 10:30:14 AM »
It’s not fair to include that 98-99 team in this poll.

The 98-99 and 99-00 teams are so clearly better than any team we’ve had since Louie retired.  This poll should just be post Jarvis to have any kind of debate.
"I drink and I know things"

Tha Kid

  • *****
  • 4662
Re: 5 Best Teams Circa 98'-99'
« Reply #7 on: February 19, 2019, 10:31:45 AM »
I’d remove the bootsy Barkley teams and add the Marcus hatten team to the debate.  Not the best team but those guys played tough d and had Marcus....made a ncaa tourney and won a NIT.  They shouldn’t be excluded here. 
"I drink and I know things"

Marillac

  • *****
  • 11224
Re: 5 Best Teams Circa 98'-99'
« Reply #8 on: February 19, 2019, 10:33:53 AM »
The 98-99 and 99-00 teams are so clearly better than any team we’ve had since Louie retired.  This poll should just be post Jarvis to have any kind of debate.

I agree with 98-99...it’s not even close. 99-00 is at least debatable, but I’d choose them. My next pick would be this season. I think we win a game in the tournament and I think we make the Big East championship game.

I felt we’d didn’t have a chance with either Lavin tournament team.

QuanMan

  • *****
  • 1744
Re: 5 Best Teams Circa 02'-03'
« Reply #9 on: February 19, 2019, 10:55:26 AM »
I’d remove the bootsy Barkley teams and add the Marcus hatten team to the debate.  Not the best team but those guys played tough d and had Marcus....made a ncaa tourney and won a NIT.  They shouldn’t be excluded here. 

Fair arguments, voting said it too, I've edited.
Section 3
Section 116

Re: 5 Best Teams Circa 02'-03'
« Reply #10 on: February 19, 2019, 10:58:58 AM »
I think the ‘11 tournament team was the best so far, though I think this team has a higher ceiling. Just a matter of if it will be reached consistently.

Re: 5 Best Teams Circa 98'-99'
« Reply #11 on: February 19, 2019, 11:05:47 AM »
Lol snub? They didn’t show up against providence in the BE tourney when they had a chance.

That was a very close game against Providence. Also- lets not forget that Providence won the Big East Tournament that year so I would not consider it a bad loss. 20 wins should have been enough that year. My thought was this- with a snub that bad, I would not even have accepted an NIT invitation because knowing the guys on the team I knew that Robert Morris was a disaster in the making. If one is that close, its not the worse thing to sit out having fallen short of ultimate goal and being motivated for next season.

Tha Kid

  • *****
  • 4662
Re: 6 Best Teams Circa 01'-02'
« Reply #12 on: February 19, 2019, 11:09:46 AM »
Fair arguments, voting said it too, I've edited.

Thanks for being open minded!

I think the '11 team pre-DJ injury was special and we would have made a run that year had he not gotten hurt.  We simply decimated Duke that season which is pretty crazy.

After that it's a tough call.  This team has the potential to be next (or even beat the '11 team since we can't be sure what would have happened if DJ stayed healthy) but we'll see how they finish.  The Hatten teams showed grit and heart that the rest of the teams on this list didn't as much, so I'm partial to them.
« Last Edit: February 19, 2019, 11:10:21 AM by Tha Kid »
"I drink and I know things"

Re: 6 Best Teams Circa 01'-02'
« Reply #13 on: February 19, 2019, 11:28:31 AM »
The 13-14 team had the most talent, but underachieved, mostly because Sampson, Sanchez, and Pointer were too similar to really work together.  That year felt like a disappointment, despite the 20 wins, and was probably the beginning of the end for Lavin (I actually think he did a better job the following year, even though he was not brought back).

The 2010-2011 team was a senior laden group, with a chip on their shoulders.  It took them awhile to adjust their games, to fit in with the new offensive and defensive schemes that Lavin and Dunlap put in.  Once they did though, in about mid-to-late January, it was pretty much smooth sailing, until the DJ injury.  That was the best team, IMO.

Re: 6 Best Teams Circa 01'-02'
« Reply #14 on: February 19, 2019, 11:50:58 AM »
That was a very close game against Providence. Also- lets not forget that Providence won the Big East Tournament that year so I would not consider it a bad loss. 20 wins should have been enough that year. My thought was this- with a snub that bad, I would not even have accepted an NIT invitation because knowing the guys on the team I knew that Robert Morris was a disaster in the making. If one is that close, its not the worse thing to sit out having fallen short of ultimate goal and being motivated for next season.

Providence and us were at that time competing for an ncaa bid, the only way we get in is if we beat them. We came out in the first half and completely laid an egg, made a nice run in the second half and fell short. There was nothing close to a “snubbing” for that team.
*wipes ketchup from his eyes* - I guess Heinz sight isn’t 20/20.

Re: 6 Best Teams Circa 01'-02'
« Reply #15 on: February 19, 2019, 12:20:26 PM »
Providence and us were at that time competing for an ncaa bid, the only way we get in is if we beat them. We came out in the first half and completely laid an egg, made a nice run in the second half and fell short. There was nothing close to a “snubbing” for that team.

If only Jakarr dunked that ball...

Re: 6 Best Teams Circa 01'-02'
« Reply #16 on: February 19, 2019, 12:31:18 PM »
If only Jakarr dunked that ball...

Goddamnit you’re right! Probably just would have lead to more heartbreak either in the next round or not hearing our name called on selection Sunday anyway.
*wipes ketchup from his eyes* - I guess Heinz sight isn’t 20/20.

SJUFAN

  • *****
  • 2280
Re: 6 Best Teams Circa 01'-02'
« Reply #17 on: February 19, 2019, 12:45:23 PM »
Can we wait to see how this season ends before we start ranking this years team?

Re: 6 Best Teams Circa 01'-02'
« Reply #18 on: February 19, 2019, 01:03:20 PM »
That 13-14 team was loaded with talent and depth.  Easily Lavin's worst job as a coach.  You had a second team of juniors Branch, Greene and Pointer, plus God's Gift who would be a "god" send on this current team.  I know Phil and Dom started but was assuming a lineup of Sheed, D-Lo, Sampson, Sanchez and Obekpa.  How that team did not make the dance is beyond is crazy.



The 13-14 team had the most talent, but underachieved, mostly because Sampson, Sanchez, and Pointer were too similar to really work together.  That year felt like a disappointment, despite the 20 wins, and was probably the beginning of the end for Lavin (I actually think he did a better job the following year, even though he was not brought back).

The 2010-2011 team was a senior laden group, with a chip on their shoulders.  It took them awhile to adjust their games, to fit in with the new offensive and defensive schemes that Lavin and Dunlap put in.  Once they did though, in about mid-to-late January, it was pretty much smooth sailing, until the DJ injury.  That was the best team, IMO.

Re: 6 Best Teams Circa 01'-02'
« Reply #19 on: February 19, 2019, 01:20:54 PM »
2010-11 team was the best that year post '99 we took down:

#3 Duke
#9 UCONN
#4 Pitt
#15 Nova
#11 ND
 
Finished with 21 wins with a stacked BE that will never be that strong again. 16 teams 8 bids.
« Last Edit: February 19, 2019, 01:21:25 PM by buckeyestorm »