UCONN TO THE BIG EAST

You should really abstain from any intelligence insults. You’ve already admitted that you don’t write well, and you’ve proven to be an adorable dope time and time again.

Don't forget about the time he literally couldn't count to 4

Lol

That was an all-time great moment for this site. SJUFan thinks he’s royalty and Poison thinks he’s an elitist. Good times.

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/402754-the-myth-of-nixons-southern-strategy

Lol

That was an all-time great moment for this site. SJUFan thinks he’s royalty and Poison thinks he’s an elitist. Good times.

I commented on LBJ, perhaps you missed it in your befuddlement over the quote button


I don't think learning things stuff is a waste of time although clearly you do and I don't think knowing what I'm talking about is a bad thing, which clearly you don't.

55 years ago this month, after a two month Democrat filibuster ("We will resist to the bitter end any measure or any movement which would have a tendency to bring about social equality and intermingling and amalgamation of the races") the Civil Rights Act of 1964 passed the House of Representatives: 80 percent of republicans voted for it and 40 percent of democrats voted against it. In the Senate 80 percent of republicans voted for it and 30 percent of democrats voted against it. Those are facts dummy. What you meant to say is that there's no quantum of evidence that will diminish your over-weening sense of satisfaction with your self-proclaimed moral superiority.

Are you using the DNA results of ancient Egyptians or of the pharaohs?

“In December 2012, DNA tests were conducted on the mummies of Pharaoh Rameses III and his son, which proved that they belonged to human Y chromosome group E1b1a. This is the Y chromosome group of Sub Saharan Africans who speak Niger–Congo languages.”

You were saying?

Are you using the DNA results of ancient Egyptians or of the pharaohs?

“In December 2012, DNA tests were conducted on the mummies of Pharaoh Rameses III and his son, which proved that they belonged to human Y chromosome group E1b1a. This is the Y chromosome group of Sub Saharan Africans who speak Niger–Congo languages.”

You were saying?

D'Souza is a criminal and that's an opinion piece.

And, believe it or not, you are sometimes wrong.

Lololol

Humans weren’t capable of such DNA evidence in 2012. This is actually just sad. The continent of Africa had such a staggering lack of technology and complex language that they were TRAMPLED by any other group that wanted to for centuries yet you need to cling to this impossible idea that your forefathers built pyramids in the one spot on the continent that had the most interaction with Europeans, Middle Eastern people, and Asians? I come from slaves and peasants...I don’t need to make up some elaborate backstory to feel better about myself. Hell, 1/20 people alive today are directly descended from Genghis Khan and he is one of the most prolific rulers if all time.

From June 2017 and from the most prestigious DNA lab in the world, Max Planck Institite:  “Previous DNA analysis of mummies has been treated with a necessary dose of skepticism, explains professor Johannes Krause of the Max Planck Institute. When you touch a bone, you probably leave more DNA on the bone than is inside (it)," he argued. "Contamination is a big issue. ... Only in the last five or six years has it become possible to actually study DNA from ancient humans, because we can now show whether DNA is ancient or not by (its) chemical properties." It goes on, “this is the first reliable data set obtained from ancient Egyptians."

Analyzing samples spanning over a millennium, researchers looked for genetic differences compared with Egyptians today. They found that the sample set showed a strong connection with a cluster of ancient non-African populations based east of the Mediterranean Sea.“

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2017/06/22/health/ancient-egypt-mummy-dna-genome-heritage/index.html

That,my friend, is checkmate.

To think that SuubSaharan Africans built the Pyramids in thr most contacted region of the continent (where all modern whites/Asians/Middle Easterners left from) when they built nothing else of note or made any major technological breakthroughs south in 200,000 years is just asinine. But if you need that, take it.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-tutankhamun-dna/half-of-european-men-share-king-tuts-dna-idUSTRE7704PB20110801

And I’m also skeptical of this DNA study coming out around the same time as your bs analysis that states all Werstern Europeans share ancestry with King Tut. Although it is a hell of a lot more likely given that Scotish and Irish mythology are so closely linked to ancient Egypt and Scotland even gets its name from the daughter of an Egyptian Pharaoh.

“Humans weren’t capable of such DNA evidence in 2012.” Yet according to your own source in 2017 (the most prestigious DNA lab in the world) “only in the last 5-6 years has it become possible to actually study DNA from ancient humans”. So let’s see...that would put us at 2011-2012?

You can’t do simple math yet your trying to convince us that you have a firm understanding of DNA/genetic literature? I’ll pass. Nice try though.

“Humans weren’t capable of such DNA evidence in 2012.” Yet according to your own source in 2017 (the most prestigious DNA lab in the world) “only in the last 5-6 years has it become possible to actually study DNA from ancient humans”. So let’s see...that would put us at 2011-2012?

You can’t do simple math yet your trying to convince us that you have a firm understanding of DNA/genetic literature? I’ll pass. Nice try though.

This is tragic. First, you are clinging to an “analysis” done by a COMMERCIAL ancesterial DNA company who makes money off of making people like you feel good about being linked to notable historical figures and not a reputable lab. Second, the same analysis you cling to says Ramesses III has some Eastern African DNA and was mixed race. Third, Ramesses II had natural RED hair. Fourth, Ramesses III died in 1155 BC, which is thousands of years after the pyramids were built and around the time sub-Saharan African DNA started to make its way into what we see in modern day Egyptians.

Finally, you missed the part where the director of the Max Planck Institute said the 2017 study was the FIRST reliable study of ancient Egyptian DNA.

I apologize if any of this upsets you, my Lord. My fealty is your’s. All hail the king.

I'm sometimes wrong - although not too often because I don't have an opinion on everything and on those things that I do I'm well-informed because I <gasp> look things up on the internets before spouting off about them - and when I am wrong I'm happy to admit it. What I'm not wrong about in this case is that the democrat party was formed to protect the institution of slavery, that the democrat party opposed reconstruction, that democrats founded the KKK and made common cause with it for 100 years, that Wilson re-segregated the government, that FDR appointed a KKK member to the Scotus, that Harry Truman was a KKK member, that the civil rights act was filibustered by democrats including Robert Byrd, the "conscience of the senate" and a former KKK Grand Kleagle who was so comfotably racist that he casually dropped an N bomb on national television and that the CRA was passed by republicans in the face of heavy democrat opposition. You're entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts. Those are facts.

And Wikipedia is a left wing propaganda cite crowd sourced through the efforts of a herd of autistic SJWs who live in their parents basements. What's your point?

Anyway, was Nixon's southern strategy anything like this? Or was it a little more subtle, you know, dog whistles and the like.

LBJs legislative skill brought a consenus of those not native to the old south to get it through.

nothing gives me greater pleasure than oldschool reading of a Gibbon, Tacitus or Suetonius.

And Wikipedia is a left wing propaganda cite crowd sourced through the efforts of a herd of autistic SJWs who live in their parents basements. What's your point?

Anyway, was Nixon's southern strategy anything like this? Or was it a little more subtle, you know, dog whistles and the like.

Lol so your counter to the DNA make up of a pharaoh is “he had red hair”. Let me ask you this...when your selecting literature to read, do they come with pop up art or coloring sections? I’ll keep it simple because your clearly confused.

Where does it say there are no traces of sub Saharan DNA found in Ancient Egyptians/Pharaohs?

just going to turn into a shitfest.