Sample size
In its last six games SJ has shot from the FT line
.53
.61
.65
.68
.63
.57
That's not a sample size issue slingblade, that's a pattern of bad free throw shooting.
Last year LJF shot 62 percent from the FT line, this year he's shooting 59 percent. Also a pattern.
You posting stupid things using words you can't spell or don't understand while shitting on the train and not washing your hands afterwards, also a pattern.
Sample size on the other hand would be, say eg that instead of your parents living in NY they'd lived in eugenics-loving Vermont and after you were born it was suggested that they be sterilized because they'd given birth to a baby with an IQ a standard deviation below average. It turns out that would have been a precipitous, because the odds would have been very high that their next child would have been closer to average intelligence. Here's the formula for sample size, where P represents your IQ (85), N the number of offspring, and Z and E the confidence score and margin of error respectively
Sample Size = [z2 * p(1-p)] / e2 / 1 + [z2 * p(1-p)] / e2 * N] = [(.95)2 * 85(1-85)] / (05)2 / 1 + [(.95)2 * 85(1-85)] / .(.05) 2 * N] = which demonstrates pretty conclusively that the more children your parents had the more likely it would have been that they'd have given birth to a child of average intelligence, that is, that they'd have progressed toward the mean. Do the math yourself if you don't believe me.