Come on man. Why don't you admit things that everyone else can see.
Ok. I wouldn't want to be labeled a contrarian.
This coach actually has a system
Yes he does. 40 minutes of hell, defensive pressure and trapping to force turnovers and easy baskets and fast break offense.
Mullin had a system too. Pro style, star dominated offense with individual decision making and freedom to create one on one, drive confidently or shoot the three without conscience at a premium.
and seems to develop players.
Williams, Dr. Roberts and the Duke have been pleasant surprises. I'm willing to give credit to the current staff for this. Yet, I'm also aware that freshmen becoming better players as sophomores is not an uncommon occurrence.
Mullin developed players too. Walden, LJ and Garfunkel spring to mind.
Last night if Mullin was coaching that game with Heron out and LJ in foul trouble all game they would have lost by 30 points.
I don't know what hypothetically would have happened in some alternate universe. Neither do you.
The players that did nothing under Mullin last year have seemed to really play better under coach Andersons system. You have to admit that's coaching.
See above.
How about the players that did something? Gil Scott's been good playing against the Sisters of the Poor. Against decent teams - not so much. In the smallest of sample sizes, LJ was horrific in the conference opener.
[/quote]