I don't think very highly of McGriff. Can he be solid guy off the bench? Maybe. He's more on par with Malik Stith. Is that good enough?
I think we have a brand of basketball now and they'll find pieces to fit that brand which is good. I'm not sure with talent the league is bringing in, success of Seton Hall, Rutgers, and through UConn into that mix we're going to have an uphill climb.
Is the style of play going to be enough to make up talent gap? I don't know.
I don’t know anything about John McGriff, except that he’s a point guard, and he was hurt last year. When you compare him to Stith, I think you also have to consider the kid’s character, and maturity. When things become challenging, does he run away? Stith did. He didn’t have to, but he clearly wasn’t ready for BE basketball. It wasn’t just a talent thing. Less talented players have played here and filled a role.
In terms of talent, what talent are we not getting that we used to get? It’s not like top ten recruits like Ron Artest are popping for St.John’s every couple of years. It’s also not like we’ve given them a reason to.
Give coach a chance to show that he has a program, and that his kids do get better. Willard and Pikiell needed that time, as well, but it is beginning to work for them. As far as UConn goes, they are in no way further along than we are, and Hurley will he entering his third season. He’s not a bust, but that’s no slam dunk hire at this point. If Anderson puts up a borderline NIT season next year, he’ll be on the hot seat. Tough town we live in.