You're more than welcome to but everything I've stated since Mike Anderson has been hired has played out. I'm not here to say I told you so but my concerns have validity.
For all the people who complained about transfers we are taking average players off bad teams in MAAC, NEC, A-10, CAA, and D2 now. Please someone defend that as a winning recruiting plan.
Rutherford was a last minute add last year by necessity. Did you have an issue with taking Mouvika as a last minute add who was likewise not a BE player in any respect? At least Rutherford was an impact player on the defensive side at this level, for all his problems on offense. I would have liked to see what Anderson could have done with him in 4 years with an actual offseason program and coaching.
Who did we take from D-II? If your problem is with Dunn and Toro as depth guys, how is that different than Carraher or Dixon? And would you rather have a guy like Dunn on your roster or some transfer from a high level school that has all kinds of issues with a better chance of flaming out (Keita, Steere, El Wright etc).
I don’t know whether Cole, Moore, Posh or Wusu will be good players or not. On paper I don’t think a few JUCO AA’s and two 3 star kids from NY, one of whom in Posh may be underranked because of an ill-times injury, is a bad thing on paper. Just like I didn’t think Champaigne was a bad thing prior to last year - on paper - and he was one of the best freshman in the league.
Jury is still out on recruiting. If the choice is between a slightly lesser ranked kid who will stay here and develop versus swinging for the fenced with more risky but talented kids, I’m not sure the former is a worse strategy, especially if you can augment that with a higher ranked prospect or two in each class (and maybe Cole and Posh turn out to be that for 2020).