Leaving alone the well-researched and unfounded "Barack Obama is a Muslim" line (there have been nearly 20 months of campaigning and every right winger and media outlet has tried to find dirt on Obama -if there was anything besides a school registration at a Muslim school in Jakarta, for a couple of years and long ago, it would have come out!);
and avoiding the fact that the guy the US assumes sent the Anthrax mailers was a white American (like the Unabomber);
and generally avoiding the slippery slope that we get into when we decide as a group that people who look a certain way are all threats, when most of the ones you see in Queens probably hate those a-holes and what they did as well, because they are immigrants who want to make that money like most folks who work hard to get to the US...
I don't think that any of the 9/11 killers wore turbAns. They worked hard to look Americanized so as not to arouse suspicion. And Sikhs (mostly Indian) wear turbans.
I was fortunate not to lose anyone in the attacks (I know some successful evacuees, and a close friend lost someone on one of the flights) but we don't have to paint a whole people with the Threat Assessment Red brush. Muslim extremists aren't the only threat, either from terrorism or in general.
So Peter, basically what youre saying is the terrorists didnt wear turbans because they didnt want to be noticed? Correct?
Now I think you're just stirring the pot for the sake of stirring the pot.
In most cases you might be right, but not in this case. Im being called a bigot all over the place here,just trying to prove a point. Here is the quote in question:
" I don't think that any of the 9/11 killers wore turbAns. They worked hard to look Americanized so as not to arouse suspicion."
Now why wouldnt they wear turbans? Because that would look suspicious? Why is wearing a turban suspicious? HMM