I saw this posted over the weekend. Read the article which I thought was poorly produced not listing the source of information. I'm not saying the news isn't true nor would I be surprised if it was the truth but they didn't even say if it was a St. John's or Duke official it learned from but just that Duke decided not to do it anymore.
http://www.nypost.com/seven/01252009/sports/college/duke_says_no_more_to_st__johns_series_151917.htm
The worst part was it appeared that the writer of the article is the person who informed Monasch
To quote the opening line of Rounders,
"Listen, here's the thing.
If you can't spot the sucker in your first half hour at the table,
then you are the sucker."At this point, does any level of incompetence or ignorance from the guy that purposefully tries to look like he sleeps in a tanning booth surprise you?
As for him being dismissive of the attendance,
1/24/1999-19,528 (highest attendance of season)
2/18/2001-19,580 (highest attendance of season)
3/2/2003-19,610 (highest attendance of season)
2/26/2005-16,920 (highest attendance of season)
2/25/2007-17,283 (highest attendance of season)
Even a man of average intelligence like Chris Monasch can predict that the Duke game will once again be easily the biggest gate and rating of the season. There is no way that the game will draw any less than the 9,807 that ND was able to bring in and that was almost two thousand higher than the next closest game of the season.
As for UCLA being able to draw consistently close to Duke in the NY area, that's spin at best. They have a fraction of the fan or alumni base. Although Nike will probably help dictate, Indiana, Kentucky, Kansas, North Carolina, Texas, Memphis, Arizona, Michigan St., Ohio St., and Illinois should all be on the table.