First, I want to say that there is certainly a case to be made that Norm should be let go. If that’s the school’s decision – and I think it is - I would understand completely. That said, if it were up to me, I’d bring him back, and I’ll try to explain why.
To me, there are two areas that would lead to the decision to fire him. You brought up the first:
You asked if it was the record:
Is it the way we finished the season (2-5)?
Is it our BE record (6-12)?
Is it our overall record (17-16)?
I saw most of the games this year, and record notwithstanding, this team was much, much improved. There’s been progress every year. I’ve heard it said many times that if this were year 4 or 5, the record would be fine. Well, I don’t feel that the fact we’re a year or two behind some folks expectations is a reason to let him go. It’s even possible to point out mitigating circumstances. Not a compelling argument to keep him, but neither, to me, is it a compelling reason to let him go.
The second area is recruiting. Specifically, he hasn’t brought in the big name, and the looming prospect of all the openings in two years. Both legitimate concerns. But... the talent level has gone up every year. And if you remember the Jarvis years (especially the last 2-3), when finding our name listed with any top recruit was rare.. and virtually nonexistent with the city kids, I again see progress. I believe the problem of the size of the junior class may not be as big a problem as some think. Again, to me, progress, and not compelling either way.
Before Jarvis’ last season, I gave up tix I’d had for over 20 years. I was horrified by the program (even before Pittsburgh and payments). That has been completely turned around. On every front, and I don’t believe it’s been easy. And even if the progress in wins & talent is slower than everyone would like.. I see progress in both areas. Enough for me to keep Norm. Not enough for others? I understand. But it would be enough for me.