Michael Chandler - C - NW FLorida JUCO - Indianapolis, IN - OREGON

  • 315 replies
  • 58169 views

paultzman

  • *****
  • 16981
Re: Michael Chandler - C - Lawrence North - Indianapolis, IN
« Reply #160 on: April 25, 2012, 12:23:31 PM »
“@AdamZagoria: Johnnies Expecting More Visitors http://t.co/pno6OBYG #stjbb”

paultzman

  • *****
  • 16981
Re: Michael Chandler - C - Lawrence North - Indianapolis, IN
« Reply #161 on: April 25, 2012, 12:25:47 PM »
Sorry, on the road and Posted quickly, now realize Chandler not referenced as visiting

Gumby

  • ***
  • 485
Re: Michael Chandler - C - Lawrence North - Indianapolis, IN
« Reply #162 on: April 25, 2012, 01:50:34 PM »
I read the update article.  I believe Michael's uncle or the article's author might have left out "not"-

"Allan Chandler, Michael’s uncle, reiterated Wednesday that his nephew has (not) committed anywhere."  Or did he mean to say "some where" instead of "any where"?

Either with or without the "not" it is a very positive update.

The next week or so could be a recruiting musical chairs scenario at St. John's.  Who will have a scholarship with us when the music stops?

Sticking with what some posters had mentioned earlier, there are recruits who would fit into the 1-10 positions (heavy minutes) and those that would be 11-13 players (true role players).

I think Orlando, Jakaar, and Jamal are 1-10 players and Felix, Max and Marco are 11-13 players.  I also believe Michael and Josiah are 1-10 players, and perhaps Darrick.  The other potential visitors seem to be 11-13 players.

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: Michael Chandler - C - Lawrence North - Indianapolis, IN
« Reply #163 on: April 25, 2012, 01:51:49 PM »
I read the update article.  I believe Michael's uncle or the article's author might have left out "not"-

"Allan Chandler, Michael’s uncle, reiterated Wednesday that his nephew has (not) committed anywhere."  Or did he mean to say "some where" instead of "any where"?

Either with or without the "not" it is a very positive update.

The next week or so could be a recruiting musical chairs scenario at St. John's.  Who will have a scholarship with us when the music stops?

Sticking with what some posters had mentioned earlier, there are recruits who would fit into the 1-10 positions (heavy minutes) and those that would be 11-13 players (true role players).

I think Orlando, Jakaar, and Jamal are 1-10 players and Felix, Max and Marco are 11-13 players.  I also believe Michael and Josiah are 1-10 players, and perhaps Darrick.  The other potential visitors seem to be 11-13 players.


A schollie is being held for him without question
Remember who broke the Slice news

Poison

  • *****
  • 16896
Re: Michael Chandler - C - Lawrence North - Indianapolis, IN
« Reply #164 on: April 25, 2012, 02:00:24 PM »
I read the update article.  I believe Michael's uncle or the article's author might have left out "not"-

"Allan Chandler, Michael’s uncle, reiterated Wednesday that his nephew has (not) committed anywhere."  Or did he mean to say "some where" instead of "any where"?

Either with or without the "not" it is a very positive update.

The next week or so could be a recruiting musical chairs scenario at St. John's.  Who will have a scholarship with us when the music stops?

Sticking with what some posters had mentioned earlier, there are recruits who would fit into the 1-10 positions (heavy minutes) and those that would be 11-13 players (true role players).

I think Orlando, Jakaar, and Jamal are 1-10 players and Felix, Max and Marco are 11-13 players.  I also believe Michael and Josiah are 1-10 players, and perhaps Darrick.  The other potential visitors seem to be 11-13 players.


It will depend on who we play. We couldn't contend with a zone, much less play one. Hooper and Bourgault are here to beat the zone.

ras

  • *****
  • 2091
Re: Michael Chandler - C - Lawrence North - Indianapolis, IN
« Reply #165 on: April 25, 2012, 02:47:32 PM »
If we are thinking about Woods, why did we sign Hooper?

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: Michael Chandler - C - Lawrence North - Indianapolis, IN
« Reply #166 on: April 25, 2012, 03:02:49 PM »
If we are thinking about Woods, why did we sign Hooper?

Wood
Remember who broke the Slice news

paultzman

  • *****
  • 16981
Re: Michael Chandler - C - Lawrence North - Indianapolis, IN
« Reply #167 on: April 25, 2012, 07:43:47 PM »
« Last Edit: April 25, 2012, 08:02:22 PM by paultzman »

Re: Michael Chandler - C - Lawrence North - Indianapolis, IN
« Reply #168 on: April 27, 2012, 05:45:34 PM »
Chandler was supposed to visit last week, was a no show

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: Michael Chandler - C - Lawrence North - Indianapolis, IN
« Reply #169 on: April 27, 2012, 06:29:59 PM »
Chandler was supposed to visit last week, was a no show

Says who? Dean Wormer?
Remember who broke the Slice news

paultzman

  • *****
  • 16981
Re: Michael Chandler - C - Lawrence North - Indianapolis, IN
« Reply #170 on: April 27, 2012, 06:31:08 PM »
Had already visited.

boo3

  • *****
  • 6816
Re: Michael Chandler - C - Lawrence North - Indianapolis, IN
« Reply #171 on: April 27, 2012, 06:33:19 PM »
Chandler was supposed to visit last week, was a no show

 Tony Almeada

Re: Michael Chandler - C - Lawrence North - Indianapolis, IN
« Reply #172 on: April 27, 2012, 06:56:25 PM »
Had already visited.

Sure about that?



boo3

  • *****
  • 6816
Re: Michael Chandler - C - Lawrence North - Indianapolis, IN
« Reply #175 on: April 27, 2012, 07:04:42 PM »
 Same guy that told you Lavin was going back to Cali, to  Cali, to Cali...?

paultzman

  • *****
  • 16981
Re: Michael Chandler - C - Lawrence North - Indianapolis, IN
« Reply #176 on: April 27, 2012, 07:06:15 PM »
Had already visited.

Sure about that?
Had already visited.

Sure about that?
Had already visited.

Sure about that?

Yup!

Ok. I specifically asked about this guy and was told he didnt show up. who knows

Know he spent time in NY last month, perhaps unofficial. He cancelled his twitter account, but prior to that made reference to being here. I could be wrong, but remember that Marco.

Re: Michael Chandler - C - Lawrence North - Indianapolis, IN
« Reply #177 on: April 27, 2012, 07:06:23 PM »
Same guy that told you Lavin was going back to Cali, to  Cali, to Cali...?

Nope, that was dean wormer.

This was the same guy who told me Lavin wasnt coaching again for last season

paultzman

  • *****
  • 16981
Re: Michael Chandler - C - Lawrence North - Indianapolis, IN
« Reply #178 on: April 27, 2012, 07:11:55 PM »
Same guy that told you Lavin was going back to Cali, to  Cali, to Cali...?

Nope, that was dean wormer.


You did predict that and raised the possibility that Lavin would leave. OK, would you agree he is now doing a decent job getting us pointed in the right direction?





« Last Edit: April 27, 2012, 07:15:19 PM by jumpinjohnny »

Re: Michael Chandler - C - Lawrence North - Indianapolis, IN
« Reply #179 on: April 27, 2012, 07:19:33 PM »
Same guy that told you Lavin was going back to Cali, to  Cali, to Cali...?

Nope, that was dean wormer.


You did predict that and raised the possibility that Lavin would leave. OK, would you agree he is now doing a decent job getting us pointed in the right direction?







Ask me that again when Lavin is back on the bench and all our recruits are suited up and on the layup line