Quincy Roberts

  • 40 replies
  • 4561 views
Quincy Roberts
« on: December 29, 2011, 03:58:18 PM »
Good stuff Dan Martin

http://johnnyjungle.com/player-feature/former-st-johns-guard-quincy-roberts-makes-home-at-grambling-state/

But, in his first full game back, coming on the road at TCU on December 22nd, Roberts unleashed the potential he saw in himself at St. John’s, scoring 28 points and grabbing 10 rebounds in a loss to the Horned Frogs.

TONYD3

  • *****
  • 5578
Re: Quincy Roberts
« Reply #1 on: December 29, 2011, 04:10:41 PM »
I wish him well. I always thought he had some talent. But I don't remember him being a big time recruit?

Re: Quincy Roberts
« Reply #2 on: December 29, 2011, 08:24:27 PM »
I wondered why he never was able to crack the rotation last year. He looked in very good shape and he looked good in practice as well.

Re: Quincy Roberts
« Reply #3 on: December 29, 2011, 09:26:22 PM »
I thought he had a concussion and was still getting over it or was that the year before.

Re: Quincy Roberts
« Reply #4 on: December 30, 2011, 12:20:14 AM »
That was the year before when he redshirted.

Marillac

  • *****
  • 11224
Re: Quincy Roberts
« Reply #5 on: December 30, 2011, 01:55:30 AM »
No question we could use him this year. I always liked Quincy, but the reality is if we kept Q we probably don't have the space to land Garrett. I'd take Garrett over him every day of the week, and the minutes that our underclassmen are filling that would have belonged to Q will have a huge return on investment the next few years.

Re: Quincy Roberts
« Reply #6 on: December 30, 2011, 05:21:19 AM »
Maybe if Quincy stays Stith leaves? Which one would you prefer?

Poison

  • *****
  • 16896
Re: Quincy Roberts
« Reply #7 on: December 30, 2011, 09:19:58 AM »
Maybe if Quincy stays Stith leaves? Which one would you prefer?

Out of Stith, Q Roberts, Edmonson and R Roberts, Stith is the only one who hasn't developed into a key player on his team.
So, at first glance, yea, I'd take Q, but as it turns out, Edmonson of all people, is the guy we needed.

sju89tr

  • *****
  • 2499
Re: Quincy Roberts
« Reply #8 on: December 30, 2011, 09:33:35 AM »
Never saw that coming with Edmondson. In addition, never thought Ced Jackson would sniff the NBA.

pmg911

  • *****
  • 4073
Re: Quincy Roberts
« Reply #9 on: December 30, 2011, 09:39:58 AM »
Good luck to both of the but they are putting up stats at the lowest levels of Div I hoops, take the numbers with a grain of salt.

sju89tr

  • *****
  • 2499
Re: Quincy Roberts
« Reply #10 on: December 30, 2011, 09:57:45 AM »
Good luck to both of the but they are putting up stats at the lowest levels of Div I hoops, take the numbers with a grain of salt.

I agree but goes to show you the type of players Norm recruited and what the current STJ staff got out of last years team.

Re: Quincy Roberts
« Reply #11 on: December 30, 2011, 10:23:36 AM »
I wondered why he never was able to crack the rotation last year. He looked in very good shape and he looked good in practice as well.

It was simple, Q is a tweener who didn't fit into Lavin's mold.  He was too slow to play the backcourt, and his shot was nothing to speak of.  Look at the wings/backcourt players Lavin's recruited, or is recruiting, they're all quick.

Poison

  • *****
  • 16896
Re: Quincy Roberts
« Reply #12 on: December 30, 2011, 10:31:12 AM »
Good luck to both of the but they are putting up stats at the lowest levels of Div I hoops, take the numbers with a grain of salt.

I don't buy that for every player. Maybe with Roberts, but Edmondon has turned into a very good player, and he'd be good against most every team. When he was here, he couldn't keep up with St.Francis. That is far from the case now.

Re: Quincy Roberts
« Reply #13 on: December 30, 2011, 11:12:29 AM »
Ty was the only STJ player I seen who I didnt think belonged on a D1 roster at any level even as a 13th man.

He just look so overwhelmed in evry aspect.
Parking only for NYCHA permit holders.

Re: Quincy Roberts
« Reply #14 on: December 30, 2011, 11:26:34 AM »
I agree with PMG -- had Stith transferred to one of those lower D-I schools, he could very easily be putting up good numbers (or do so in the future).  Malik is very fast and athletic, and would probably be one of the better athletes in those teams/conferences.  I don't fault Ty or Q for transferring, but kudos to Malik for wanting to compete against the best.  I hope he has a few moments in him this year, provides leadership/intangibles (in addition to minutes), and develops his game so that maybe next year he can contribute a bit more.

Also, I think Roberts is a different animal than the other two, as he seemed to be recruited by bigger and better schools.

Re: Quincy Roberts
« Reply #15 on: December 30, 2011, 11:29:15 AM »
Good luck to both of the but they are putting up stats at the lowest levels of Div I hoops, take the numbers with a grain of salt.


I agree but goes to show you the type of players Norm recruited and what the current STJ staff got out of last years team.
What type of player are you speaking of?

sju89tr

  • *****
  • 2499
Re: Quincy Roberts
« Reply #16 on: December 30, 2011, 11:35:27 AM »
Good luck to both of the but they are putting up stats at the lowest levels of Div I hoops, take the numbers with a grain of salt.


I agree but goes to show you the type of players Norm recruited and what the current STJ staff got out of last years team.
What type of player are you speaking of?

Go down the list of the players Norm recruited then played at lower Div 1 like Calhoun, Wright, Jackson, Edmonson, Grey, Wait, etc. If it weren't for our current staff I do not believe that last years senior laden team would have done any better than an NIT bid and barely scratching .500 for the season.   

Re: Quincy Roberts
« Reply #17 on: December 30, 2011, 11:40:35 AM »
Good luck to both of the but they are putting up stats at the lowest levels of Div I hoops, take the numbers with a grain of salt.


I agree but goes to show you the type of players Norm recruited and what the current STJ staff got out of last years team.
What type of player are you speaking of?

Go down the list of the players Norm recruited then played at lower Div 1 like Calhoun, Wright, Jackson, Edmonson, Grey, Wait, etc. If it weren't for our current staff I do not believe that last years senior laden team would have done any better than an NIT bid and barely scratching .500 for the season.   

Those were players Norm recruited,except Poles who barely got on floor in 2nd half of games

sju89tr

  • *****
  • 2499
Re: Quincy Roberts
« Reply #18 on: December 30, 2011, 11:41:43 AM »
Good luck to both of the but they are putting up stats at the lowest levels of Div I hoops, take the numbers with a grain of salt.


I agree but goes to show you the type of players Norm recruited and what the current STJ staff got out of last years team.
What type of player are you speaking of?

Go down the list of the players Norm recruited then played at lower Div 1 like Calhoun, Wright, Jackson, Edmonson, Grey, Wait, etc. If it weren't for our current staff I do not believe that last years senior laden team would have done any better than an NIT bid and barely scratching .500 for the season.   

Those were players Norm recruited,except Poles who barely got on floor in 2nd half of games

Don't understand your point?

Re: Quincy Roberts
« Reply #19 on: December 30, 2011, 11:44:59 AM »
You criticized the type of player norm brought in, those were his recruits who helped get St Johns back