Rutgers - Game Thread

  • 265 replies
  • 20767 views
Re: Rutgers - Game Thread
« Reply #220 on: March 04, 2012, 12:39:40 AM »
Please stop responding to Lapchick1.  It serves no purpose.

Agree arguing with an idiot just makes all us look like idiots just ignore him and hopefully he goes away

"idiot"?  Have I called anyone an idiot?  Yet you want to ban me!  INCREDIBLE!  What nerve!  Anybody who roots for St. John's who attempts to discuss the continous unwanted results in a realtic manner gets banned.  Another words, lie and spin and you'll be aqccepted.  However, how does that become part of the solution when doing that hasn't solved a thing in 20 years now?

The same posters defended Norm Roberts too.  I'll say this about Lavin THAT IS POSITIVE.  Lavin is a much better recruiter than Norm Roberts and Lavin is a very good recruiter.  However, Lavin has run into some early difficulty keeping players that he's recruited for various reason already discussed.

I dont know you personally so I shouldn't of called you that. You may be the nicest guy in the world so I apologize. How ever when comes to basketball you dont have a clue at all and thats just being real. When I hear you saying Lavin aint gonna last long or should be on the hot seat that just shows me how little you know about basketball, the big east and this program.

What's our record this season?

What has record been year after year for the past 20 years?

Now I ask you, what are you defending?  What have we been so successful at?  If 16 or so of the past 20 years have been almost in the league finishes than there is going to be some criticisim in return. 

"You don't get by on mediocrity in sports.  In sports you have to be a winner".
Again this is where you are out of your f'ing mind.

Lavin is the coach. Doesn't matter what happened here the last 20 years. The school finally made a commitment to winning.

Lavin is a winner. Period. Has the results to back it up. He got f'ing cancer.

You have no clue how the business world works. Lavin is the CEO now. We have 2 players on the team ( In Lavin's 1st full recruiting class ) who are 2 of our all time best freshman.

Tick Tock

Lavin is obviously not responsible for the last 19 or so years YES your right.  However, there has been a losing culture here at St. John's now for decades and we're losing again so until that changes that culture still exists.  Now that doesn't mean that it will CONTINUE to exist, because Lavin has the ability to change it.  We'll see, but I'm very concerned right now.  Lets see how well Lavin finishes with recruiting this current class for starters.  I'll tell you right now, if we lose this guy and that guy and setlle on a few other Plan-B and Plan-C choices THAT NONE OF THE OTHER FORMIDABLE SCHOOLS WANTED (that's what happened too often with Norm Roberts except his were PLAN-D and Plan-E guys instead), than I'm not going to spin it going forward into next season.  I'm not going to come on this board if that becomes the case and start bragging about our chances.  EX:  Who do we replace Pelle, Arkansas transfer, Gathers & Sampson etc. etc. with?  Do we HOLD ON to our best undereclassmen at least 3 years?
« Last Edit: March 04, 2012, 12:43:57 AM by Lapchick1 »

Re: Rutgers - Game Thread
« Reply #221 on: March 04, 2012, 12:45:23 AM »
I was skipping Lapckick1's posts until I read that he compared himself to Jesus Christ.  I had to go back and read that one.  LOL!!!

Re: Rutgers - Game Thread
« Reply #222 on: March 04, 2012, 12:48:55 AM »
Season is over and so is Lapchick's membership here.
Follow Johnny Jungle on Twitter at @Johnny_Jungle

kob24

  • *****
  • 2255
Re: Rutgers - Game Thread
« Reply #223 on: March 04, 2012, 12:57:00 AM »
Boyah

gman

  • *****
  • 1533
Re: Rutgers - Game Thread
« Reply #224 on: March 04, 2012, 01:13:32 AM »
Season is over and so is Lapchick's membership here.

 :up:

Marillac

  • *****
  • 11224
Re: Rutgers - Game Thread
« Reply #225 on: March 04, 2012, 01:21:12 AM »
Yo stop #$%^ing arguing with him Jesus Christ. This shit is a waste of my time reading. Anyway we need to get more out of Dom next week. I want him guarding jj or ashton

Dead on.  I'd like to see Dom on Gibbs.  Gibbs doesn't have the athletic ability to shake Dom enough to get off a comfortable shot.  Dom would give him fits.  Garrett on JJ would be a good matchup.

Everyone expects Pitt to walk all over us, but this will be a very different game.   I expect our guys to punch Pitt right in the mouth and will be fighting on the boards for sure.  I think we jump out to a double-digit lead early...and hopefully the youngins will hang on. 

Re: Rutgers - Game Thread
« Reply #226 on: March 04, 2012, 01:33:30 AM »
Yo stop #$%^ing arguing with him Jesus Christ. This shit is a waste of my time reading. Anyway we need to get more out of Dom next week. I want him guarding jj or ashton

Dead on.  I'd like to see Dom on Gibbs.  Gibbs doesn't have the athletic ability to shake Dom enough to get off a comfortable shot.  Dom would give him fits.  Garrett on JJ would be a good matchup.

Everyone expects Pitt to walk all over us, but this will be a very different game.   I expect our guys to punch Pitt right in the mouth and will be fighting on the boards for sure.  I think we jump out to a double-digit lead early...and hopefully the youngins will hang on.

Our players have too much pride to let them walk all over us again. It will be a fight, I think it will be close either way

Re: Rutgers - Game Thread
« Reply #227 on: March 04, 2012, 09:28:47 AM »
Season is over and so is Lapchick's membership here.
+10

boo3

  • *****
  • 6816
Re: Rutgers - Game Thread
« Reply #228 on: March 04, 2012, 09:42:25 AM »
it's midnight and i just wanna give a shout out to my cuz macneill taken out in the hail but lives 4eva more in the hearts and minds of ilio.    peace     will     one      day      come,

 Not sure if something happened recently or you are remembering someone from the past...either way, peace my friend.

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: Rutgers - Game Thread
« Reply #229 on: March 04, 2012, 12:58:37 PM »
Goodnight all.  Unfortunate they couldn't pull it out.  Have fun ripping on Lapchick1.  His mom makes him turn off the computer at midnight.

How many thousands of times have we read the above in the last 20 years?  "Unfortunately we couldn't pull it out"...

When does it ever stop?  When is enough enough already to you?  Do you see a pattern here that isn't good?  I certainly do.

Congrats on this post.  It was your first post where you didn't go back and edit it.

*EDIT Too bad he didn't get to see my congratulatory words :)
« Last Edit: March 04, 2012, 01:05:15 PM by Moose »
Remember who broke the Slice news

redslope

  • *****
  • 1823
Re: Rutgers - Game Thread
« Reply #230 on: March 04, 2012, 05:15:21 PM »
Season is over and so is Lapchick's membership here.


In 12 pages the one comment that is the most meaningful!!

Dan

  • *****
  • 1220
Re: Rutgers - Game Thread
« Reply #231 on: March 04, 2012, 05:57:11 PM »
While I disagreed with Lapchick1 this is the same kind of stuff that occurred when everyone was rah rah about Norm Roberts.  This time most of these rm.com'ers won't look foolish since Lavin is a good coach, but keep in mind many of these homers that put down others and their opinions were celebrating the failure of Roberts.
« Last Edit: March 04, 2012, 05:58:45 PM by Dan »

Re: Rutgers - Game Thread
« Reply #232 on: March 04, 2012, 06:17:30 PM »
While I disagreed with Lapchick1 this is the same kind of stuff that occurred when everyone was rah rah about Norm Roberts.  This time most of these rm.com'ers won't look foolish since Lavin is a good coach, but keep in mind many of these homers that put down others and their opinions were celebrating the failure of Roberts.

I don't see what Lapchick did wrong.

Re: Rutgers - Game Thread
« Reply #233 on: March 04, 2012, 06:29:48 PM »
While I disagreed with Lapchick1 this is the same kind of stuff that occurred when everyone was rah rah about Norm Roberts.  This time most of these rm.com'ers won't look foolish since Lavin is a good coach, but keep in mind many of these homers that put down others and their opinions were celebrating the failure of Roberts.

Has nothing to do with who's the coach but the continued rants that disrupted every thread he posted in. You're the only person who ever has an issue when someone gets the boot. I have no patience for people who come in here just to cause trouble. Everything always gets better when the bad apples are removed from the tree thats not coincidence
Follow Johnny Jungle on Twitter at @Johnny_Jungle

Re: Rutgers - Game Thread
« Reply #234 on: March 04, 2012, 06:31:36 PM »
While I disagreed with Lapchick1 this is the same kind of stuff that occurred when everyone was rah rah about Norm Roberts.  This time most of these rm.com'ers won't look foolish since Lavin is a good coach, but keep in mind many of these homers that put down others and their opinions were celebrating the failure of Roberts.

I don't see what Lapchick did wrong.

Thats part of the problem with you too.
Follow Johnny Jungle on Twitter at @Johnny_Jungle

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: Rutgers - Game Thread
« Reply #235 on: March 04, 2012, 06:32:12 PM »
The site is private.  Dave can do whatever he chooses.  I commend him for staying on top of issues like this.
Remember who broke the Slice news

paultzman

  • *****
  • 16981
Re: Rutgers - Game Thread
« Reply #236 on: March 04, 2012, 06:35:02 PM »
The site is private.  Dave can do whatever he chooses.  I commend him for staying on top of issues like this.

+1 Moose. Discourse v. Ranting

Re: Rutgers - Game Thread
« Reply #237 on: March 04, 2012, 06:41:50 PM »
And the best thing is Lapchick65 can keep his screen name now without me mistaking him for the other guy.

Differing opinions are great but if someone can't see how the guy that just got banned offered nothing I just ask the simple question why didn't he post during the game ?

He waits till the game is over then comes on ranting.

Like Moose just said I think Dave has been very fair with bannings ( some seem to forget that when he got rid of IllWIll he got rid of class of 72 also who he himself admits he deserved it ).

Dave's done a great job keeping on top of the nonsense lately on both sides of the arguments. His site his rules. That simple
« Last Edit: March 04, 2012, 06:45:09 PM by mjmaherjr »

boo3

  • *****
  • 6816
Re: Rutgers - Game Thread
« Reply #238 on: March 04, 2012, 07:39:31 PM »
While I disagreed with Lapchick1 this is the same kind of stuff that occurred when everyone was rah rah about Norm Roberts.  This time most of these rm.com'ers won't look foolish since Lavin is a good coach, but keep in mind many of these homers that put down others and their opinions were celebrating the failure of Roberts.

I don't see what Lapchick did wrong.

 Please tell me your joking....

Re: Rutgers - Game Thread
« Reply #239 on: March 04, 2012, 09:15:04 PM »
While I disagreed with Lapchick1 this is the same kind of stuff that occurred when everyone was rah rah about Norm Roberts.  This time most of these rm.com'ers won't look foolish since Lavin is a good coach, but keep in mind many of these homers that put down others and their opinions were celebrating the failure of Roberts.

I don't see what Lapchick did wrong.

 Please tell me your joking....

What had he done differently than what has been done the past few years? Posters have been complaining about the players,staff, the AD, a priest and where the program is going since ii can't remember.