Men's Basketball Top 144 Previews

http://www.collegesportsmadness.com/mens-basketball/top-144-previews?page=2

St Johns anchoring at #144

http://www.collegesportsmadness.com/article/4273

I thought you were joking.

All around terrible assessment from someone with no specific knowledge about anything related to stj basketball.

144...  Lol.  Can't wait for these idiots to see end of season results.  I don't think 144 even puts us in the CBI ...

We'll be seeing a lot of this, this season. Everyone thinks Harkless was our only player.

Last year, they had St Johns at 87

We'll be seeing a lot of this, this season. Everyone thinks Harkless was our only player.

I love it.  It will make for bigger headlines when to the surprise and dismay of many out there we start moving up and making headlines. 

Was he on bath salts?

Pure
stupid














pure garbage my friends








stupitity

Jaspers at 138, no Iona YET

A team that should run its offense through Gift probably should be ranked #144. But, the presence of Darrick Wood does give us depth, so I'll give him that.

The most comical thing is their recruiting service had Jakarr Sampson as the 118th best prospect  This is a guy who is probably and IMO top 25.

Baldi I swear to god if u ever post anything as dumb as this again im coming to ur house and burning ur computer.

Baldi couldn't post this fast enough.

Last year, they had St Johns at 87

That doesn't even make sense. We're returning everybody but Harkless with a loaded bench now.

Is this an April Fool's post or do they list teams in alphabetical order??

Quote from: Marco Baldi on July 23, 2012, 07:15:14 PM

Last year, they had St Johns at 87

That doesn't even make sense. We're returning everybody but Harkless with a loaded bench now.

Last year, 87 made sense. It turned out to be right. This nice person did no research before he evaluated the 12-13 Storm. He's a terrible journalist, and he should be called out for his lack of ability.

Quote from: redstorm212 on July 23, 2012, 10:02:38 PM

Quote from: Marco Baldi on July 23, 2012, 07:15:14 PM

Last year, they had St Johns at 87

That doesn't even make sense. We're returning everybody but Harkless with a loaded bench now.

Last year, 87 made sense. It turned out to be right. This nice person did no research before he evaluated the 12-13 Storm. He's a terrible journalist, and he should be called out for his lack of ability.

Yeah, but how do we go from 87 to 144 when we are returning everybody but Harkless and have a loaded bench now? That just makes no sense.

Why waste time on this crap?

Are you sure he didn't mean St. John's of Minnesota? ...The other St. John's...