Wow............ Zags Blog article tough to take.

Who you getting rid of.

Since we have spoken about this topic, I will answer..

I would keep either Rico or Martin and get rid of the rest...

Since we have spoken about this topic, I will answer..

I would keep either Rico or Martin and get rid of the rest...

We knew where you were going

Quote from: Linda Mirabella on January 04, 2013, 10:50:06 AM

Quote from: Poison on January 04, 2013, 09:59:04 AM

There's something about the way someone posts that tells us if that poster is a St.John's fan.

And those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw bricks.

I've been a season ticket holder since 1982. How about you?

Again, to be crystal clear, you are not a St.John's fan. Nor are you a woman.

At least not literally.

And it's stones, not bricks. You sound Seton Hall educated.

OK little boy, since you asked.  I have been a season ticket holder since the early 70s.  Was there in the early days of Davis, schafer, Searcy, Prince and the boys. Would put my knowledge of St. John's hoops against yours any time. Not a St. John"s fan, gee, it is you who make such nasty statements as the "team is practicing like girls" that surely questions where your loyaly is. 

And it was meant to be bricks with the nasty statements you constantly make about the team.   And if you
yourself are a grad, I'm sure it was from their two year college at best. Have a nice day.

Quote from: pmg911 on January 04, 2013, 04:43:46 PM

Since we have spoken about this topic, I will answer..

I would keep either Rico or Martin and get rid of the rest...

We knew where you were going

Actually, I have to agree with PMG on this.  It seems that Rico and Martin have the same function on the team.  Both seem astute at developing back court players, while neither seem to be astute at game preparation or x and o stuff.  Then again, they just may, who knows?

Quote from: Moose on January 04, 2013, 04:54:44 PM

Quote from: pmg911 on January 04, 2013, 04:43:46 PM

Since we have spoken about this topic, I will answer..

I would keep either Rico or Martin and get rid of the rest...

We knew where you were going

Actually, I have to agree with PMG on this.  It seems that Rico and Martin have the same function on the team.  Both seem astute at developing back court players, while neither seem to be astute at game preparation or x and o stuff.  Then again, they just may, who knows?

If you have followed this site you would know he has suggested another member of the staff leave on previous occasions.

What's your beef with Chiles, PMG?  I am far from an Insider, but many here and in the media (to an extent) credit him with a lot of our recruiting successes.

If zags article is true, how come no other news organization have picked this up? The post said the opposite earlier this week.

Just for hypotheticals, but Chiles is a fantastic recruiter and the last guy I'd consider getting "rid" of on the staff.

If zags article is true, how come no other news organization have picked this up? The post said the opposite earlier this week.

The Post didn't say "the opposite" (as in he would be cleared), the Post said a decision would come in the next 7-10 days.

Quote from: nudginator59 on January 04, 2013, 11:28:23 PM

If zags article is true, how come no other news organization have picked this up? The post said the opposite earlier this week.

The Post didn't say "the opposite" (as in he would be cleared), the Post said a decision would come in the next 7-10 days.

. They also didn't he defiantly wil not either. The article was more optimistic.

Quote from: JayJay on January 05, 2013, 07:36:16 AM

Quote from: nudginator59 on January 04, 2013, 11:28:23 PM

If zags article is true, how come no other news organization have picked this up? The post said the opposite earlier this week.

The Post didn't say "the opposite" (as in he would be cleared), the Post said a decision would come in the next 7-10 days.

. They also didn't he defiantly wil not either. The article was more optimistic.

Maybe Zags was pulling a George Costanza...doing the opposite 

what does hicks do?  i thought he'd be our "inside" guy re: nyc area players.

what does hicks do?  i thought he'd be our "inside" guy re: nyc area players.

No value IMO.

We miss Dunlap.  It is clear we need an Xs and Os expert. I dont know who I would replace but I would replace someone to make room.

what does hicks do?  i thought he'd be our "inside" guy re: nyc area players.

This is always brought up, he is our DOBO, not an assistant coach.

Quote from: newsman13 on January 05, 2013, 11:26:24 AM

what does hicks do?  i thought he'd be our "inside" guy re: nyc area players.

This is always brought up, he is our DOBO, not an assistant coach.

AKA he can't actively 'recruit'

It's hilarious that about a month ago I questioned the makeup of the coaching staff and I was universally ridiculed for it.   
And now ? 

It's hilarious that about a month ago I questioned the makeup of the coaching staff and I was universally ridiculed for it.   
And now ? 

Who criticized you?  Universally would imply the majority of the board.  I think its just a few people who post a lot that might have strong opinions FOR certain people on the staff.

It's hilarious that about a month ago I questioned the makeup of the coaching staff and I was universally ridiculed for it.   
And now ? 

Not universally, but soundly! With ya!

It's hilarious that about a month ago I questioned the makeup of the coaching staff and I was universally ridiculed for it.   
And now ? 

And now...others should be ridiculed for it.