« previous next »
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 »   Go Down

2013 Bracketology Watch Thread

  • 154 replies
  • 15766 views
*

paultzman

  • *****
  • 16981
Re: 2013 Bracketology Watch Thread
« Reply #120 on: February 24, 2013, 08:53:27 PM »
#1 seed somewhere anyway;

“@Kieran_Lynch: #stjbb RT @nybuckets #NIT Bracketology where I can't wait for the auto-bids to join us.http://wp.me/p1s9Af-1Be”
Logged
*

Redstormy80

  • *****
  • 1715
Re: 2013 Bracketology Watch Thread
« Reply #121 on: February 26, 2013, 02:17:13 PM »
5th out according to Lunardi
Logged
*

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: 2013 Bracketology Watch Thread
« Reply #122 on: February 26, 2013, 02:19:57 PM »
Quote from: Redstormy80 on February 26, 2013, 02:17:13 PM
5th out according to Lunardi

What do you mean?
People on these boards have them so far from the NCAA's that can't be right.

Logged
Remember who broke the Slice news
*

boo3

  • *****
  • 6816
Re: 2013 Bracketology Watch Thread
« Reply #123 on: February 26, 2013, 02:27:14 PM »
Quote from: Moose on February 26, 2013, 02:19:57 PM
Quote from: Redstormy80 on February 26, 2013, 02:17:13 PM
5th out according to Lunardi

What do you mean?
People on these boards have them so far from the NCAA's that can't be right.

 Seth Davis says STJ has to win their last 3 to get in. 
Logged
*

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: 2013 Bracketology Watch Thread
« Reply #124 on: February 26, 2013, 02:29:24 PM »
Quote from: boo3 on February 26, 2013, 02:27:14 PM
Quote from: Moose on February 26, 2013, 02:19:57 PM
Quote from: Redstormy80 on February 26, 2013, 02:17:13 PM
5th out according to Lunardi

What do you mean?
People on these boards have them so far from the NCAA's that can't be right.

 Seth Davis says STJ has to win their last 3 to get in. 

I feel 2 is ok provided we win at least 1 in the BET.  Just my opinion nothing more nothing less.
Logged
Remember who broke the Slice news
*

CC

  • **
  • 224
Re: 2013 Bracketology Watch Thread
« Reply #125 on: February 26, 2013, 03:20:25 PM »
Quote from: Moose on February 26, 2013, 02:29:24 PM
Quote from: boo3 on February 26, 2013, 02:27:14 PM
Quote from: Moose on February 26, 2013, 02:19:57 PM
Quote from: Redstormy80 on February 26, 2013, 02:17:13 PM
5th out according to Lunardi

What do you mean?
People on these boards have them so far from the NCAA's that can't be right.

 Seth Davis says STJ has to win their last 3 to get in. 

I feel 2 is ok provided we win at least 1 in the BET.  Just my opinion nothing more nothing less.

Agree 2 out of 3 , and 1 in BET and we dance.
Logged
*

Gray Chudney

  • *****
  • 1238
Re: 2013 Bracketology Watch Thread
« Reply #126 on: February 26, 2013, 03:27:51 PM »
Quote from: CC on February 26, 2013, 03:20:25 PM
Quote from: Moose on February 26, 2013, 02:29:24 PM
Quote from: boo3 on February 26, 2013, 02:27:14 PM
Quote from: Moose on February 26, 2013, 02:19:57 PM
Quote from: Redstormy80 on February 26, 2013, 02:17:13 PM
5th out according to Lunardi

What do you mean?
People on these boards have them so far from the NCAA's that can't be right.

 Seth Davis says STJ has to win their last 3 to get in. 

I feel 2 is ok provided we win at least 1 in the BET.  Just my opinion nothing more nothing less.

Agree 2 out of 3 , and 1 in BET and we dance.

I concur. This is why Pitt was not a "must win". 3 any way and we are strong bubble
Logged
*

CC

  • **
  • 224
Re: 2013 Bracketology Watch Thread
« Reply #127 on: February 26, 2013, 03:44:47 PM »
Quote from: Gray Chudney on February 26, 2013, 03:27:51 PM
Quote from: CC on February 26, 2013, 03:20:25 PM
Quote from: Moose on February 26, 2013, 02:29:24 PM
Quote from: boo3 on February 26, 2013, 02:27:14 PM
Quote from: Moose on February 26, 2013, 02:19:57 PM
Quote from: Redstormy80 on February 26, 2013, 02:17:13 PM
5th out according to Lunardi

What do you mean?
People on these boards have them so far from the NCAA's that can't be right.

 Seth Davis says STJ has to win their last 3 to get in. 

I feel 2 is ok provided we win at least 1 in the BET.  Just my opinion nothing more nothing less.

Agree 2 out of 3 , and 1 in BET and we dance.

I concur. This is why Pitt was not a "must win". 3 any way and we are strong bubble

I really don't think we can win in ND, so thus Prov Saturday will be considered a must win, imo.
Logged
*

Gray Chudney

  • *****
  • 1238
Re: 2013 Bracketology Watch Thread
« Reply #128 on: February 26, 2013, 03:48:37 PM »
Quote from: CC on February 26, 2013, 03:44:47 PM
Quote from: Gray Chudney on February 26, 2013, 03:27:51 PM
Quote from: CC on February 26, 2013, 03:20:25 PM
Quote from: Moose on February 26, 2013, 02:29:24 PM
Quote from: boo3 on February 26, 2013, 02:27:14 PM
Quote from: Moose on February 26, 2013, 02:19:57 PM
Quote from: Redstormy80 on February 26, 2013, 02:17:13 PM
5th out according to Lunardi

What do you mean?
People on these boards have them so far from the NCAA's that can't be right.

 Seth Davis says STJ has to win their last 3 to get in. 

I feel 2 is ok provided we win at least 1 in the BET.  Just my opinion nothing more nothing less.

Agree 2 out of 3 , and 1 in BET and we dance.

I concur. This is why Pitt was not a "must win". 3 any way and we are strong bubble

I really don't think we can win in ND, so thus Prov Saturday will be considered a must win, imo.
PC playing very well at home. I think they are pretty equal in difficulty. We will be odds on underdogs in all of them but conceivably could beat all three. Time to man up and play like we belong
Logged
*

gman

  • *****
  • 1533
Re: 2013 Bracketology Watch Thread
« Reply #129 on: February 26, 2013, 10:03:39 PM »
Minnesota just locked up a spot. The pf doesn't have to repay his scholarship like he promised if they missed the tourney.
Logged
*

Red2395

  • ****
  • 692
Re: 2013 Bracketology Watch Thread
« Reply #130 on: February 27, 2013, 08:52:54 AM »
Quote from: Moose on February 26, 2013, 02:29:24 PM
Quote from: boo3 on February 26, 2013, 02:27:14 PM
Quote from: Moose on February 26, 2013, 02:19:57 PM
Quote from: Redstormy80 on February 26, 2013, 02:17:13 PM
5th out according to Lunardi

What do you mean?
People on these boards have them so far from the NCAA's that can't be right.

 Seth Davis says STJ has to win their last 3 to get in. 

I feel 2 is ok provided we win at least 1 in the BET.  Just my opinion nothing more nothing less.

I agree 2 out of 3 and 1 in the BET
Logged
*

Tha Kid

  • *****
  • 4662
Re: 2013 Bracketology Watch Thread
« Reply #131 on: February 27, 2013, 09:09:31 AM »
We need a minimum of 19 wins. However we decide to get there.
Logged
"I drink and I know things"
*

sju89tr

  • *****
  • 2499
Re: 2013 Bracketology Watch Thread
« Reply #132 on: February 27, 2013, 09:28:19 AM »
Quote from: CC on February 26, 2013, 03:44:47 PM
Quote from: Gray Chudney on February 26, 2013, 03:27:51 PM
Quote from: CC on February 26, 2013, 03:20:25 PM
Quote from: Moose on February 26, 2013, 02:29:24 PM
Quote from: boo3 on February 26, 2013, 02:27:14 PM
Quote from: Moose on February 26, 2013, 02:19:57 PM
Quote from: Redstormy80 on February 26, 2013, 02:17:13 PM
5th out according to Lunardi

What do you mean?
People on these boards have them so far from the NCAA's that can't be right.

 Seth Davis says STJ has to win their last 3 to get in. 

I feel 2 is ok provided we win at least 1 in the BET.  Just my opinion nothing more nothing less.

Agree 2 out of 3 , and 1 in BET and we dance.

I concur. This is why Pitt was not a "must win". 3 any way and we are strong bubble

I really don't think we can win in ND, so thus Prov Saturday will be considered a must win, imo.

The season hinges on Saturdays game, we lose and we are NIT bound. Win next 2 and it takes pressure off. 
Logged
*

JungleFever

  • ***
  • 482
Re: 2013 Bracketology Watch Thread
« Reply #133 on: February 27, 2013, 09:38:55 AM »
http://espn.go.com/blog/collegebasketballnation/post/_/id/77430/bracket-update-1-line-shakeup-vols-soar

Tennessee knocks off Florida and jumps from out of the picture and on to the bubble. If other teams keep picking up signature wins against top 20 teams we are going to be pushed out by default no matter how many wins we finish with....
Logged
*

sju89tr

  • *****
  • 2499
Re: 2013 Bracketology Watch Thread
« Reply #134 on: February 27, 2013, 10:08:04 AM »
Quote from: JungleFever on February 27, 2013, 09:38:55 AM
http://espn.go.com/blog/collegebasketballnation/post/_/id/77430/bracket-update-1-line-shakeup-vols-soar

Tennessee knocks off Florida and jumps from out of the picture and on to the bubble. If other teams keep picking up signature wins against top 20 teams we are going to be pushed out by default no matter how many wins we finish with....

It's survival of the fittest. We need to do the same. Got to win vs. Providence and win against either ND or Marquette at a minimum. I am thinking the Marquette game is more important even though it's at home.
Logged
*

Marillac

  • *****
  • 11224
Re: 2013 Bracketology Watch Thread
« Reply #135 on: February 27, 2013, 12:31:50 PM »
Quote from: Tha Kid on February 27, 2013, 09:09:31 AM
We need a minimum of 19 wins. However we decide to get there.

Agreed.  19 puts us in the conversation, but 20 would put us over the top IMO.  The lack of a monster win on the resume jumps out immediately.  I just don't see it happening, but I'd love to be surprised. 
Logged
*

Celtics11

  • *****
  • 5789
Re: 2013 Bracketology Watch Thread
« Reply #136 on: February 27, 2013, 02:49:30 PM »
Wish all you guys were on committee. Can't just look at it from St. J's perspective, must consider the comp and where everyone finishes up-final resumes. Goin only 3 and 2 when we are out as of now I doubt will be enough.
Logged
*

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: 2013 Bracketology Watch Thread
« Reply #137 on: February 27, 2013, 02:50:29 PM »
Quote from: Celtics11 on February 27, 2013, 02:49:30 PM
Wish all you guys were on committee. Can't just look at it from St. J's perspective, must consider the comp and where everyone finishes up-final resumes. Goin only 3 and 2 when we are out as of now I doubt will be enough.

It  would be really 3 and 1.  Everyone pretty much get a loss tacked on with their post season tournament ;)
Logged
Remember who broke the Slice news
*

Celtics11

  • *****
  • 5789
Re: 2013 Bracketology Watch Thread
« Reply #138 on: February 27, 2013, 03:02:42 PM »
Some teams actually do win their conference tournament. ;)
Logged
*

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: 2013 Bracketology Watch Thread
« Reply #139 on: February 27, 2013, 03:06:31 PM »
Quote from: Celtics11 on February 27, 2013, 03:02:42 PM
Some teams actually do win their conference tournament. ;)

Vast majority dont ;)
Logged
Remember who broke the Slice news
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 »   Go Up
« previous next »