Marquette Game Discussion

  • 340 replies
  • 18801 views
Re: Marquette Game Discussion
« Reply #80 on: March 09, 2013, 03:05:27 PM »
Rumor---just a rumor---Gift is transferring to Harvard for grad school next year.

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: Marquette Game Discussion
« Reply #81 on: March 09, 2013, 03:06:01 PM »
Marco with 9 long range attempts, he's not getting pulled so must be part of the game plan.
Remember who broke the Slice news

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: Marquette Game Discussion
« Reply #82 on: March 09, 2013, 03:06:33 PM »
Rumor---just a rumor---Gift is transferring to Harvard for grad school next year.

Sitting next to Max all year did he ask him about campus?
Remember who broke the Slice news

Re: Marquette Game Discussion
« Reply #83 on: March 09, 2013, 03:07:54 PM »
Just realized, we have 0 ft attempts at half. Speaks to our power game. At least we have solid perimeter shooting to offset that. Jeez!

Its true we don't get to many shots at the rim. But the refs didn't do us any favors  vis a vis the fouling department.
« Last Edit: March 09, 2013, 03:08:54 PM by Amaseinyourface2 »
*wipes ketchup from his eyes* - I guess Heinz sight isn’t 20/20.

Re: Marquette Game Discussion
« Reply #84 on: March 09, 2013, 03:09:18 PM »
SJU 1 for 14 in last 8 minutes.
that wasn't all subs missing.
It might be fun if Sampson and O can get through the first ten of the second half with no fouls..or just one to be realistic.

No but when you have a walk on in the game your playing 4 on 5.  Therefore attention deflects.

Maybe the walk-on is the missing shooter we are looking for . . .

jr49

  • ****
  • 755
Re: Marquette Game Discussion
« Reply #85 on: March 09, 2013, 03:09:25 PM »
Would Tommy really give Gift any run?

Re: Marquette Game Discussion
« Reply #86 on: March 09, 2013, 03:09:32 PM »
Does the campus matter?  It's Harvard!  If true, good for him.

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: Marquette Game Discussion
« Reply #87 on: March 09, 2013, 03:09:50 PM »
SJU 1 for 14 in last 8 minutes.
that wasn't all subs missing.
It might be fun if Sampson and O can get through the first ten of the second half with no fouls..or just one to be realistic.

No but when you have a walk on in the game your playing 4 on 5.  Therefore attention deflects.

Maybe the walk-on is the missing shooter we are looking for . . .

Yeah and I'm watching the game with Mila Kunis.
Remember who broke the Slice news

Re: Marquette Game Discussion
« Reply #88 on: March 09, 2013, 03:10:38 PM »
SJU 1 for 14 in last 8 minutes.
that wasn't all subs missing.
It might be fun if Sampson and O can get through the first ten of the second half with no fouls..or just one to be realistic.

No but when you have a walk on in the game your playing 4 on 5.  Therefore attention deflects.

Maybe the walk-on is the missing shooter we are looking for . . .

Yeah and I'm watching the game with Mila Kunis.

Congrats!!!

paultzman

  • *****
  • 16981
Re: Marquette Game Discussion
« Reply #89 on: March 09, 2013, 03:10:46 PM »
Early fold?

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: Marquette Game Discussion
« Reply #90 on: March 09, 2013, 03:11:00 PM »
Does the campus matter?  It's Harvard!  If true, good for him.

My question would be why he didn't transfer earlier in the year then? If he transferred he gets a year in the system and plays next year.  Same as transferring for free after this year.
Remember who broke the Slice news

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: Marquette Game Discussion
« Reply #91 on: March 09, 2013, 03:11:16 PM »
SJU 1 for 14 in last 8 minutes.
that wasn't all subs missing.
It might be fun if Sampson and O can get through the first ten of the second half with no fouls..or just one to be realistic.

No but when you have a walk on in the game your playing 4 on 5.  Therefore attention deflects.

Maybe the walk-on is the missing shooter we are looking for . . .

Yeah and I'm watching the game with Mila Kunis.

Congrats!!!

:)
Remember who broke the Slice news

paultzman

  • *****
  • 16981
Re: Marquette Game Discussion
« Reply #92 on: March 09, 2013, 03:12:29 PM »
Was the dangerous in March theory for 2014?

goredmen

  • *****
  • 5066
Re: Marquette Game Discussion
« Reply #93 on: March 09, 2013, 03:13:30 PM »
Does the campus matter?  It's Harvard!  If true, good for him.

My question would be why he didn't transfer earlier in the year then? If he transferred he gets a year in the system and plays next year.  Same as transferring for free after this year.

I think if you transfer for grad school you can play right away

Re: Marquette Game Discussion
« Reply #94 on: March 09, 2013, 03:13:55 PM »
Talk about a recurring theme.   
*wipes ketchup from his eyes* - I guess Heinz sight isn’t 20/20.

Re: Marquette Game Discussion
« Reply #95 on: March 09, 2013, 03:14:08 PM »
Every freaking game...

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: Marquette Game Discussion
« Reply #96 on: March 09, 2013, 03:14:27 PM »
Does the campus matter?  It's Harvard!  If true, good for him.

My question would be why he didn't transfer earlier in the year then? If he transferred he gets a year in the system and plays next year.  Same as transferring for free after this year.

I think if you transfer for grad school you can play right away

Yea I said that.  But no matter what he couldn't play till next year.  What is gained by staying all year with us.
Remember who broke the Slice news

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: Marquette Game Discussion
« Reply #97 on: March 09, 2013, 03:14:53 PM »
And there she goes........
Remember who broke the Slice news

Re: Marquette Game Discussion
« Reply #98 on: March 09, 2013, 03:15:01 PM »
Does the campus matter?  It's Harvard!  If true, good for him.

My question would be why he didn't transfer earlier in the year then? If he transferred he gets a year in the system and plays next year.  Same as transferring for free after this year.

He has to complete his Bachelor's before he can transfer for Grad School.

Re: Marquette Game Discussion
« Reply #99 on: March 09, 2013, 03:15:23 PM »
It's like deja vu all over again.