Under Armour

  • 576 replies
  • 79088 views
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #220 on: June 04, 2013, 08:12:06 AM »
Does anyone know when the jersey's are going to be released?

desco80

  • *****
  • 5072
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #221 on: June 14, 2013, 09:51:16 AM »
Tweet from former CBS, now ESPN college football writer ... not sure why he's writing about us, but:

Brett McMurphy ‏@McMurphyESPN 6m
St. John's will have 6-year apparel & equipment deal w/Under Armour July 1 ending 20-year relationship w/Nike
« Last Edit: June 14, 2013, 09:54:26 AM by desco80 »

Re: Under Armour
« Reply #222 on: June 14, 2013, 03:39:06 PM »
Tweet from former CBS, now ESPN college football writer ... not sure why he's writing about us, but:

Brett McMurphy ‏@McMurphyESPN 6m
St. John's will have 6-year apparel & equipment deal w/Under Armour July 1 ending 20-year relationship w/Nike
Maybe he thinks we have a football program (St. John's of Minnesota?).  :)

Re: Under Armour
« Reply #223 on: June 18, 2013, 05:26:47 PM »
New Unis?
« Last Edit: June 19, 2013, 05:45:22 PM by jumpinjohnny »

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #224 on: June 18, 2013, 05:38:43 PM »
It's nothing different and probably just a hold over for the summer tour.  They are designing new uni's and that's probably just a band aid to get thru the summer tour and launch the big debuts when more eyes are on everything when school starts
Remember who broke the Slice news

Re: Under Armour
« Reply #225 on: June 18, 2013, 05:40:50 PM »
New Unis?


Above was taken down and replaced with a pic of two guys in Gtown Unis...

desco80

  • *****
  • 5072
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #226 on: June 18, 2013, 05:42:43 PM »
New Unis?

Looks like it.  But I don't think I've ever seen the guy wearing #21 before.   Am I wrong?

Re: Under Armour
« Reply #227 on: June 18, 2013, 05:50:55 PM »
New Unis?

Looks good. Not a huge difference, just some nice changes here and there.

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #228 on: June 18, 2013, 05:55:08 PM »
New Unis?

Looks like it.  But I don't think I've ever seen the guy wearing #21 before.   Am I wrong?

Yeah I had no clue who he was.

Also I didn't see any changes at all.  You did?
Remember who broke the Slice news

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #229 on: June 18, 2013, 05:55:39 PM »
New Unis?

Looks good. Not a huge difference, just some nice changes here and there.

There are more changes.  Pretty sure its just a holdover for now.
Remember who broke the Slice news

desco80

  • *****
  • 5072
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #230 on: June 18, 2013, 05:59:11 PM »
New Unis?

Looks like it.  But I don't think I've ever seen the guy wearing #21 before.   Am I wrong?

Yeah I had no clue who he was.

Also I didn't see any changes at all.  You did?

So I believe you if you say that this is just to get the team through summer, and the real debut would be closer to the fall.   Makes sense.
But to answer your question, (after making my browser 150%) yes, I did notice some things.
No black and white stripe on the shoulder blades.  Instead a white stripe around the collar.
Also a white stripe and rivets going down the side under the armpit.  Logo is exactly the same though. 
« Last Edit: June 18, 2013, 06:00:11 PM by desco80 »

Re: Under Armour
« Reply #231 on: June 18, 2013, 05:59:12 PM »
New Unis?

Looks like it.  But I don't think I've ever seen the guy wearing #21 before.   Am I wrong?

Yeah I had no clue who he was.

Also I didn't see any changes at all.  You did?

Looks like they took out most of the black, especially at the top of the uniform, like in this pic:



And we have lines with check marks down the sides similar to Marylands jersey:



This could all be a placeholder, but maybe not since it looks like they took it down.

thetruth8734

  • ****
  • 613
  • SJU Alum
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #232 on: June 18, 2013, 06:00:28 PM »
New Unis?

Looks like it.  But I don't think I've ever seen the guy wearing #21 before.   Am I wrong?

Yeah I had no clue who he was.

Also I didn't see any changes at all.  You did?

There's a checkered pattern down the right side.

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #233 on: June 18, 2013, 06:11:53 PM »
Thanks I couldn't zoom in really.  I saw some vague piping on the side.  Black is gone because as it was speculated blue would be inserted instead.
Remember who broke the Slice news

Re: Under Armour
« Reply #234 on: June 18, 2013, 06:27:35 PM »
Thanks I couldn't zoom in really.  I saw some vague piping on the side.  Black is gone because as it was speculated blue would be inserted instead.

Yes!
*wipes ketchup from his eyes* - I guess Heinz sight isn’t 20/20.

Re: Under Armour
« Reply #235 on: June 19, 2013, 10:25:04 PM »
Larger look at the uniform.


boo3

  • *****
  • 6816
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #236 on: June 19, 2013, 10:27:15 PM »
Georgetown recruiting the Jersey Shore hard these days, huh?  :D

Re: Under Armour
« Reply #237 on: June 19, 2013, 11:59:41 PM »
Larger look at the uniform.



I wish I could see a little more leg. No Roy Hibbert
« Last Edit: June 20, 2013, 12:27:32 AM by Amaseinyourface2 »
*wipes ketchup from his eyes* - I guess Heinz sight isn’t 20/20.

Re: Under Armour
« Reply #238 on: June 20, 2013, 11:10:43 AM »
^^^^ Not the uniforms. I've seen all the uniforms for next season.
Follow Johnny Jungle on Twitter at @Johnny_Jungle

Re: Under Armour
« Reply #239 on: June 20, 2013, 11:48:32 AM »
^^^^ Not the uniforms. I've seen all the uniforms for next season.

Do you approve of what you've seen?