Villanova Discussion

  • 256 replies
  • 22470 views

Chilleb

  • *****
  • 1850
Re: Villanova Discussion
« Reply #200 on: January 11, 2014, 03:16:11 PM »
I'm done with Phil , you gotta get the ball to deangelo on the break. He's terrible I've said it time and time again he belongs in the maac

Re: Villanova Discussion
« Reply #201 on: January 11, 2014, 03:16:41 PM »
Honestly these rotations are ridiculous. Phil and Dom gaves us negatives today.
*wipes ketchup from his eyes* - I guess Heinz sight isn’t 20/20.

goredmen

  • *****
  • 5066
Re: Villanova Discussion
« Reply #202 on: January 11, 2014, 03:18:26 PM »
Honestly these rotations are ridiculous. Phil and Dom gaves us negatives today.

Karr was worse than both of them

boo3

  • *****
  • 6816
Re: Villanova Discussion
« Reply #203 on: January 11, 2014, 03:20:22 PM »
 I don't even get mad anymore like I used to..  Program has beaten me down..  I'm just glad I gave up season tickets 5 years ago and I haven't spent a penny on this team since...  Waste.

Re: Villanova Discussion
« Reply #204 on: January 11, 2014, 03:22:39 PM »
If we win this one, it's a divine intervention at this point.

Re: Villanova Discussion
« Reply #205 on: January 11, 2014, 03:22:45 PM »
I don't even get mad anymore like I used to..  Program has beaten me down..  I'm just glad I gave up season tickets 5 years ago and I haven't spent a penny on this team since...  Waste.

Beginning to feel beat as well
*wipes ketchup from his eyes* - I guess Heinz sight isn’t 20/20.

goredmen

  • *****
  • 5066
Re: Villanova Discussion
« Reply #206 on: January 11, 2014, 03:23:00 PM »
Better hope we get hot in the BET. That's the only way we see the tourney this year

Re: Villanova Discussion
« Reply #207 on: January 11, 2014, 03:23:47 PM »
Honestly these rotations are ridiculous. Phil and Dom gaves us negatives today.

Karr was worse than both of them

3-16 for ten points combined. Jakarr was just not as bad
*wipes ketchup from his eyes* - I guess Heinz sight isn’t 20/20.

Re: Villanova Discussion
« Reply #208 on: January 11, 2014, 03:27:22 PM »
Long NIT run will give Lavin more time to experiment for next February anyway
« Last Edit: January 11, 2014, 03:27:43 PM by we are sju »

0404

  • *****
  • 1293
Re: Villanova Discussion
« Reply #209 on: January 11, 2014, 03:27:30 PM »
Absolutely no moral victory here regardless of their ranking. I fully expected to be better than them at the beginning of the year.

boo3

  • *****
  • 6816
Re: Villanova Discussion
« Reply #210 on: January 11, 2014, 03:28:29 PM »
 Been a diehard since '82 when I saw STJ/ Gtown at Garden and Kevin Williams tried to knock out Ewing... this is the least interested I've been, in season, since then.. 

 At least Jarvis teams were good and fun to watch..  This is just crap.. plain and simple.   I wish there was a reset button.

goredmen

  • *****
  • 5066
Re: Villanova Discussion
« Reply #211 on: January 11, 2014, 03:29:02 PM »
Long NIT run will give Lavin more time to experiment for next February anyway

I wish I had the confidence to think that we'd be able to win a few games in the NIT

jr49

  • ****
  • 755
Re: Villanova Discussion
« Reply #212 on: January 11, 2014, 03:29:59 PM »
Two best players are guards. Front court just not good enough.

Re: Villanova Discussion
« Reply #213 on: January 11, 2014, 03:34:55 PM »
SJU 2.0 (Kansas St) down big at Kansas

Re: Villanova Discussion
« Reply #214 on: January 11, 2014, 03:37:33 PM »
SJU 2.0 (Kansas St) down big at Kansas

How do you figure 2.0? Omari and Jevon?
*wipes ketchup from his eyes* - I guess Heinz sight isn’t 20/20.

DFF6

  • *****
  • 1648
Re: Villanova Discussion
« Reply #215 on: January 11, 2014, 03:39:09 PM »
The sum of this team's parts is greater than its whole. We are just not that good. No amount of gelling in February will change that. At this rate NIT is not assured. 

Re: Villanova Discussion
« Reply #216 on: January 11, 2014, 03:39:28 PM »
SJU 2.0 (Kansas St) down big at Kansas

How do you figure 2.0? Omari and Jevon?

Correct

Re: Villanova Discussion
« Reply #217 on: January 11, 2014, 03:46:06 PM »
Two best players are guards. Front court just not good enough.
I agree outside of Rysheed and DeAngelo, we absolutely no scorers and shooters. We now can't even finish at the rim. I don't think February is going to change anything, when you can't shoot, you can't shoot. It has been a trend for 3 years with this group and it is what it is. NIT at best right now.

Don't expect much to change next either, Rysheed cannot doing it all by himself. Everybody will just pack the paint, a no brainer for this group. At least they played hard this week.

Re: Villanova Discussion
« Reply #218 on: January 11, 2014, 03:55:46 PM »
I'm done with this team for a while.  Been and seen to enough games to know Lavin is more about PR than coaching.   If this school  gives him a contract without a tourney appearance with his own players, let's just all admit the school could care less about anything

TONYD3

  • *****
  • 5578
Re: Villanova Discussion
« Reply #219 on: January 11, 2014, 04:05:34 PM »
I hate losing also. My posts this week were negative . No moral victories . But we lost to a good team. We were prepared and played hard. A few calls went against us. We missed to many shots. If we put this effort in every game we are a good team. We play nova 10 times think we could win 5.