Bracketology thread

  • 332 replies
  • 53396 views

Poison

  • *****
  • 16896
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #300 on: February 25, 2015, 10:36:01 AM »
On ESPN we are a #9 seed in the West playing #8 OK St. Winner gets Gonzaga.

Good to hear. I think we can go 2-1, and then 1-1 in the BE tourney. That would probably keep us at a 9 seed.
« Last Edit: February 25, 2015, 10:36:14 AM by Poison »

TONYD3

  • *****
  • 5578
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #301 on: February 25, 2015, 11:01:03 AM »
Will they make us avoid playing Duke and gonzaga in round 2? If so better chance of playing Kentucky .

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #302 on: February 25, 2015, 11:29:19 AM »
Will they make us avoid playing Duke and gonzaga in round 2? If so better chance of playing Kentucky .

We can't play a team we played already in the first 2 rounds.
Remember who broke the Slice news

Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #303 on: February 25, 2015, 11:46:22 AM »
Will they make us avoid playing Duke and gonzaga in round 2? If so better chance of playing Kentucky .

We can't play a team we played already in the first 2 rounds.

it has happened before - 2011 i believe there were two games where BE teams played eachother - uconn/cinci and cuse/marquette in the round of 32

Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #304 on: February 25, 2015, 12:13:18 PM »
Will they make us avoid playing Duke and gonzaga in round 2? If so better chance of playing Kentucky .

We can't play a team we played already in the first 2 rounds.

it has happened before - 2011 i believe there were two games where BE teams played eachother - uconn/cinci and cuse/marquette in the round of 32

Yes.  I believe the committee tries to avoid rematches the first weekend, but it's not a hard and fast rule.

Tha Kid

  • *****
  • 4662
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #305 on: February 25, 2015, 12:59:23 PM »
Not sure if there is something more up to date...

http://www.ncaa.com/news/basketball-men/article/2013-08-01/committee-changes-bracketing-guidelines-division-i-tournament

"This means that teams from the same conference that played only once during the season can now face each other as early as the third round of the championship. Subsequently, teams from the same league that met twice during the year will not potentially play each other until the regional semifinals. Also, teams from the same league that played each other three times during the course of the season cannot play until the regional championship game.

The previous guidelines did not allow more than two teams from a league to be in the same region unless nine or more teams were selected from one conference. This has only occurred twice in the history of the championship (Big East with 11 teams in 2011 and nine in 2012). Under the new principles, each of the top four teams selected from a conference will be placed in separate regions, only if they are seeded on the first four lines. This replaces the principle that separated the top three teams from a league regardless of the teams’ placement within the bracket."
"I drink and I know things"

0404

  • *****
  • 1293
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #306 on: February 25, 2015, 01:04:54 PM »
I also believe when that says "third round" it's referring to what pretty much everyone considers the second round....because the "first four" play-in games are now considered the first round IIRC.

Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #307 on: February 25, 2015, 01:19:29 PM »
I also believe when that says "third round" it's referring to what pretty much everyone considers the second round....because the "first four" play-in games are now considered the first round IIRC.

Yes, that's what they mean.  Terminology will be changing next year, to (I believe) Opening Round, First Round, and Second Round.

nudginator59

  • *****
  • 1437
  • It's better to be a Smart ass then a Dumb shart
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #308 on: February 25, 2015, 01:33:09 PM »
On ESPN we are a #9 seed in the West playing #8 OK St. Winner gets Gonzaga.

Good to hear. I think we can go 2-1, and then 1-1 in the BE tourney. That would probably keep us at a 9 seed.

Hopefully we can do a little bit better and movie up. I wouldn't want to face the Zags again in the 2/3 round (depending on how you view the rounds). I know making it to the 2nd round would be a great accomplishment this year, but the Zags always have our number and I would hate to be knocked iut for the 3rd time by them.
Cougar O' Malley

TONYD3

  • *****
  • 5578
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #309 on: February 25, 2015, 01:48:52 PM »
I want to be either a 6 or 11. The top 8 teams are really good. If we play a good game  beating a 3 seed wont be an upset.

Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #310 on: February 25, 2015, 01:55:30 PM »
I want to be either a 6 or 11. The top 8 teams are really good. If we play a good game  beating a 3 seed wont be an upset.

I want to be in the tournament

hnk

  • *****
  • 1681
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #311 on: February 25, 2015, 02:12:23 PM »
I for Iona?

Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #312 on: February 25, 2015, 02:12:24 PM »
I want to be either a 6 or 11. The top 8 teams are really good. If we play a good game  beating a 3 seed wont be an upset.

I want to be in the tournament

Just win your MAAC tournament.

Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #313 on: February 25, 2015, 02:47:04 PM »
I want to be either a 6 or 11. The top 8 teams are really good. If we play a good game  beating a 3 seed wont be an upset.

I want to be in the tournament

Just win your MAAC tournament.

Agreed. But I was talking as a SJU fan. We lose out and there are problems

desco80

  • *****
  • 5072
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #314 on: February 25, 2015, 02:56:28 PM »
I want to be either a 6 or 11. The top 8 teams are really good. If we play a good game  beating a 3 seed wont be an upset.

I want to be in the tournament

Just win your MAAC tournament.

Why are you provoking him?   Baldi hasn't said a word about Iona in this thread and the two of you start trolling him.

Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #315 on: February 25, 2015, 03:21:03 PM »
I want to be either a 6 or 11. The top 8 teams are really good. If we play a good game  beating a 3 seed wont be an upset.

I want to be in the tournament

Just win your MAAC tournament.

Why are you provoking him?   Baldi hasn't said a word about Iona in this thread and the two of you start trolling him.

I find it fun to troll the troll. Tyvm.

TONYD3

  • *****
  • 5578
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #316 on: February 25, 2015, 03:23:58 PM »
Why is someone provoking Baldi? Wow! Now he is a victim.

Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #317 on: February 26, 2015, 09:39:29 PM »
Nice road win for Minnesota.  Should solidify top 100 rpi for them which helps us
When you're a kid from New York and you do it in New York, that lasts forever!

nudginator59

  • *****
  • 1437
  • It's better to be a Smart ass then a Dumb shart
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #318 on: February 26, 2015, 10:13:34 PM »
According Lunardi SJU is now a 10 seed Vs Michigan State. Keep winning.
Cougar O' Malley

Wods317

  • *****
  • 1713
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #319 on: February 26, 2015, 10:55:50 PM »
According Lunardi SJU is now a 10 seed Vs Michigan State. Keep winning.

After being a 9 seed yesterday and Xavier is a 7. Makes zero sense, I can guarantee you this is not accurate. We have a better resume and are 2-0 agains them and they are 3
Spots higher, not a chance.