« previous next »
Pages: « 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 »   Go Down

Bracketology thread

  • 332 replies
  • 53508 views
*

ras

  • *****
  • 2091
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #280 on: February 22, 2015, 05:01:13 PM »
Not that this means much. But GT barely beat DePaul last night in DC. I think a key to making and hopefully advancing in the tourney is if we are healthy.
« Last Edit: February 22, 2015, 05:02:30 PM by ras »
Logged
*

rdstr25

  • ****
  • 795
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #281 on: February 23, 2015, 10:14:53 AM »
New Brackets out by Lunardi.  SJU is a 10 seed playing Mr. Polee and SDST. 

Last 2 times Lundardi had SJU as a 10 seed, our record was 500 in conference. .500 in conference, seems to be the bench mark according to Lunardi for us to be securely in.

http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/bracketology

Logged
*

LoganK

  • ****
  • 739
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #282 on: February 23, 2015, 11:09:02 AM »
Apparently doesn't apply to Big 12 or Big Ten teams though.  Iowa a 10 seed despite 6-8 B1G record, Texas a 9 despite 6-8 Big XII record and being 1-9 vs the top 50.  Ok State an 8 seed at 7-8 in the Big XII.  Midwest bias! lol
Logged
*

TONYD3

  • *****
  • 5578
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #283 on: February 23, 2015, 11:20:37 AM »
6/11 game is where we want to be. We would only be a small under dog vs a 3
Logged
*

rdstr25

  • ****
  • 795
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #284 on: February 23, 2015, 11:36:54 AM »
Quote from: LoganK on February 23, 2015, 11:09:02 AM
Apparently doesn't apply to Big 12 or Big Ten teams though.  Iowa a 10 seed despite 6-8 B1G record, Texas a 9 despite 6-8 Big XII record and being 1-9 vs the top 50.  Ok State an 8 seed at 7-8 in the Big XII.  Midwest bias! lol

Sorry, meant 500 in Big East
Logged
*

talkbigeast

  • ****
  • 504
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #285 on: February 23, 2015, 12:05:01 PM »
CBS has St. Johns as an 8 seed.
Logged
*

0404

  • *****
  • 1293
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #286 on: February 23, 2015, 12:36:36 PM »
I would sign up for a Zaga or Duke rematch in the 2nd round...
Logged
*

LoganK

  • ****
  • 739
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #287 on: February 23, 2015, 12:50:30 PM »
With Temple and Cinci in Lunardi's last four byes, the AAC is running the risk of having only one team make the dance.  I think Cinci will still make it, but Temple might be on the outside looking in.
Logged
*

hnk

  • *****
  • 1681
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #288 on: February 23, 2015, 01:01:11 PM »
Prov. now ranked 25 and we did beat them twice.
Logged
*

prjohnnies

  • *****
  • 2779
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #289 on: February 23, 2015, 01:03:27 PM »
I just want to get in.  I don't care where we are seeded and who we play.  Win the next 3 in a row and I'll start talking about that.
Logged
*

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #290 on: February 23, 2015, 02:52:24 PM »
Quote from: 0404 on February 23, 2015, 12:36:36 PM
I would sign up for a Zaga or Duke rematch in the 2nd round...

Do they still have the rule of no regular season rematches in first 2 rounds?
Logged
Remember who broke the Slice news
*

bball purist

  • *****
  • 2842
    • Follow me on twitter @TerpsJohnnies
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #291 on: February 23, 2015, 03:01:23 PM »
Quote from: Moose on February 23, 2015, 02:52:24 PM
Quote from: 0404 on February 23, 2015, 12:36:36 PM
I would sign up for a Zaga or Duke rematch in the 2nd round...

Do they still have the rule of no regular season rematches in first 2 rounds?
Yes, and teams not in tourney sweet sixteen over 14 or more years get easier matchups in first two/three rounds 
Logged
*

Tha Kid

  • *****
  • 4662
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #292 on: February 23, 2015, 03:06:51 PM »
Quote from: 0404 on February 23, 2015, 12:36:36 PM
I would sign up for a Zaga or Duke rematch in the 2nd round...

You are that down on Duke and Gonzaga of the 1/2 seeds?

I'd sign up for a UVA, Arizona, or Kansas matchup way before I'd sign up for Duke or Gonzaga...

Logged
"I drink and I know things"
*

LoganK

  • ****
  • 739
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #293 on: February 24, 2015, 11:12:02 PM »
Maryland beats Wisconsin.  Does this end the debate for the 4th one seed? (assuming Gonzaga wins out)
Logged
*

upstate32

  • ****
  • 582
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #294 on: February 24, 2015, 11:17:20 PM »
Quote from: LoganK on February 24, 2015, 11:12:02 PM
Maryland beats Wisconsin.  Does this end the debate for the 4th one seed? (assuming Gonzaga wins out)
If Nova wins out, .I think they have a great case to be a 1 over Gonzaga.
Logged
*

LoganK

  • ****
  • 739
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #295 on: February 24, 2015, 11:21:24 PM »
The Seton Hall loss might prevent that the way things are going.  I think Nova is a better team, but Zaga's only loss was @Arizona.  That being said, we're their second best win, so, it's certainly possible.
Logged
*

upstate32

  • ****
  • 582
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #296 on: February 24, 2015, 11:27:09 PM »
There's a shot we are a 9 seed on Lunardi's Thursday update.  9 seeds Texas and Texas A&M both lost tonight.
Logged
*

LoganK

  • ****
  • 739
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #297 on: February 24, 2015, 11:37:53 PM »
Texas being considered in right now is a joke.  1 top 50 win, at home against WVU.  Next best win is neutral court vs Iowa.  Best road win is Uconn/TCU depending on what rankings you're going by.  They have 17 wins.  12 are against 101+.  The only thing they've done is avoided a bad loss.
Logged
*

bball purist

  • *****
  • 2842
    • Follow me on twitter @TerpsJohnnies
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #298 on: February 25, 2015, 09:11:46 AM »
Quote from: LoganK link=topic=9211.msg221067#msg221067 date[img height=10 width=10
http://cdncache-a.akamaihd.net/items/it/img/arrow-10x10.png[/img]=1424839073]
Texas being considered in right now is a joke.  1 top 50 win, at home against WVU.  Next best win is neutral court vs Iowa.  Best road win is Uconn/TCU depending on what rankings you're going by.  They have 17 wins.  12 are against 101+.  The only thing they've done is avoided a bad loss.
Texas has been playing like crap. I don't care if they're in the best conference, if a team doesn't distinguish itself in its conference through a .500 or better record, it better have some real meat on their signature wins. Otherwise, I believe those 23-24 win teams in lesser conferences get a crack at it.
Logged
*

kingofk1ngs

  • ****
  • 637
Re: Bracketology thread
« Reply #299 on: February 25, 2015, 10:28:47 AM »
On ESPN we are a #9 seed in the West playing #8 OK St. Winner gets Gonzaga.
Logged
Pages: « 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 »   Go Up
« previous next »