Why is everyone so concerned with Lavin's paycheck? That's between him, the school and the people woh fund his salary (if any). Objection to him should be based on results. I'm sick of hearing from people (not necessarily you, Baldi) who go to 2 games a year complaining about his salary as if it is coming out of their pockets. Stick to the argument that he hasn't produced on the court. If we bring in a coach a 300k, will the same fans be satisfied with 10 wins a year?
The bigger question. When Lavin is extended, will you posters keep this argument going for the next four years, or can we go back to talking basketball?