Lunardi has 5 from the SEC getting in. I only see 2 deserved
While I don't think Georgia is good, they have a solid profile. RPI 39, SOS 38. Kentucky and Arkansas are locks. Ole Miss and LSU are bubble teams, and at least one should not get a bid.
Georgia 0 wins vs top 50
Great call. They are bubble too.
Given these relatively inferior resumes, why do you think St John's is in a play in game?
Pooped the bed down the stretch
That doesn't seem terribly objective. I doubt the committee will view it that way. Losing @ Nova (RPI 3) and to PC in the BET (RPI 21, SOS 5. beat them twice already) after ripping through February is not that bad.
Just my opinion, but I think the committee appreciates good play to finish the year. Not thumpings.
So are you saying that two losses to top 21 teams, including a road loss to a likely 1 seed, to close the season will put a team like Georgia higher on the S-Curve than SJU? I understand your perspective but it really is not logical given bottom end of the at large contenders.
I don't think Georgia deserves a bid. As for the 2 losses, it wasn't even close, poor showing. Again, just my opinion
Of this group of 21 teams fighting for ~15 at large bids, who do you think deserves to dance:
St. John's, Oregon, NC State, Dayton, LSU, Georgia, Colorado State, OK State, Boise State, Texas, Purdue, Temple, Ole Miss, Indiana, BYU, UCLA, Texas A&M, Old Dominion, Miami, Tulsa, Richmond
By the numbers (RPI, SOS, KenPom, top 50/100 wins), SJU has at worst a top 10 resume in this group.