Quote from: LJSA on June 08, 2011, 10:16:17 PMQuote from: fordham96 on June 08, 2011, 10:10:29 PMI think I made made my point. I don't see anyone disputing my point that all of those players including the SJU freshmen would start for any MAAC team and everyone knows that.Put our sixth through 10th players in 2012-13 as starters on any team in the MAAC and they would win that conference.The eligible or uneligible 6-10 players?
Quote from: fordham96 on June 08, 2011, 10:10:29 PMI think I made made my point. I don't see anyone disputing my point that all of those players including the SJU freshmen would start for any MAAC team and everyone knows that.Put our sixth through 10th players in 2012-13 as starters on any team in the MAAC and they would win that conference.
I think I made made my point. I don't see anyone disputing my point that all of those players including the SJU freshmen would start for any MAAC team and everyone knows that.
The eligible or uneligible 6-10 players?
Quote from: Marco Baldi on June 08, 2011, 10:18:25 PMThe eligible or uneligible 6-10 players?I suppose we can always just have grades changed to get them eligible like Iona did with Glover. If that fails, we could just pay new players to come like they did with Momo.
Quote from: LJSA on June 09, 2011, 03:14:11 PMQuote from: Marco Baldi on June 08, 2011, 10:18:25 PMThe eligible or uneligible 6-10 players?I suppose we can always just have grades changed to get them eligible like Iona did with Glover. If that fails, we could just pay new players to come like they did with Momo.Doesnt matter, as long as they are qualitized. Lets see which school is on probation first
Quote from: Marco Baldi on June 09, 2011, 06:29:57 PMQuote from: LJSA on June 09, 2011, 03:14:11 PMQuote from: Marco Baldi on June 08, 2011, 10:18:25 PMThe eligible or uneligible 6-10 players?I suppose we can always just have grades changed to get them eligible like Iona did with Glover. If that fails, we could just pay new players to come like they did with Momo.Doesnt matter, as long as they are qualitized. Lets see which school is on probation firstIt's posts like this that make me wonder why you post here.
enough already!!! He ain't coming to SJU so who cares. There are more posts here than for any of the fine young men who signed up to be Redmen. Support them not someone who does not matter to SJU. post on the iona board or on the board of whoever will have him if you must. He does NOT exist to SJU!
Come on Marco try being an adult, Iona is nice but isn't this site about SJU basketball!
Gotta say, Baldi aint too far off wit his backcourt prognostications.
Quote from: LJSA on June 09, 2011, 03:14:11 PMQuote from: Marco Baldi on June 08, 2011, 10:18:25 PMThe eligible or uneligible 6-10 players?I suppose we can always just have grades changed to get them eligible like Iona did with Glover. If that fails, we could just pay new players to come like they did with Momo.Who would have ever thought Iona grads would put up that much money to get a player ? Guess the grads who worked at Marty and Lenny's did pretty good
http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/1LVCzF/www.msg.com/blogs/jon-rothstein/what-the-momo-factor-means-for-iona-plus-other-hoops-notes-1.68927It's a crazy thought but if Jones is allowed to play next season, one could make the argument that the Gaels could have the three best players in the metropolitan area with Jones, Glover, and senior point guard Scott Machado. It's a debatable topic for sure -- Seton Hall's Herb Pope, LIU's Julian Boyd, Fordham's Chris Gaston, and Rutgers' Dane Miller and Gilvydas Biruta could all be in the conversation but just the fact that the question is raised speaks volumes about the level of talent that's being stocked in New Rochelle. The Gaels staff is also privately high on former White Plains star Rashad James, who be eligible next season.