I can't see how it impacts transfers and also how it can impact in a situation where we changed staffs. So Lavin and Hicks weren't part of the 2009 class. I understand how it pertains to Jack and Sanders but this one I'm not following the logic. This has to be a first with this rule. I don't think this was the intention of the rule.
What if he sat out? Would that eliminate the problem?
If St. John's really wanted him, they'd challenge this. Momo's been in school for 2 years. Moe Hicks was involved with Momo Jones MORE than 2 years ago - didn't Momo graduate from American Christian? He wasn't a Rice Raider his senior year. I don't know if the staff is throwing that out there to make it seem that they can't bring in Momo b/c they don't want him, or if Lenn is interpreting their coldness and then using the rule to possibly justify it.
But I'd love to hear from someone in the NCAA if there would be any restriction to bringing in a player like this. There shouldn't be. I see why it applies to transfers, but again - it's been 2 years. Almost 2 since Jones graduated HS and more than 2 since he was associated with Hicks.
I call bull.
Looks like Jones is out as an option. The rule is when Hicks was hired. So it is 2 years removed from 2010 not 2009 when Jones became a collegiate player.
http://www.zagsblog.com/2011/05/24/ncaa-rule-says-jones-cant-enroll-at-st-johns/
Ok, addendum: I think the rule is challengeable, and if St. John's wanted him, they would try. Also love the digs that Zags gets in at Lenny and Jeff Goodman (the "blindly concurred" one).