They weren't incredibly poor at player development. They were just average. We know what incredibly poor player development looks like. We suffered through 6 years of it. Ignoring Justin Brownlee, Dwight Hardy, Sean Evans, Malik Boothe, Paris Horne, Justin Burrell, D'Angelo Harrison, Phil Greene and NBA draft pick Dom Pointer simply isn't fair.
Could you explain how Lavin developed Dwight Hardy? That is, could you name the skills he showed deficiency in as a junior and how they improved between March of his junior year and November of his senior year and what you think Steve Lavin did in those seven months to accomplish that improvement and could you be as specific as possible? Thanks.
When you're done with that could you do the same thing for Horne, Evans, Brownlee Boothe and Burrell? Thanks.
(If the answer is he used them differently than Norm, don't bother, because that's not the same thing.)
Could you explain why Steve Lavin suggested red shirting Dom Pointer before his senior year if he had already helped him develop as player. (When mid year Lavin took credit for Pointer's improved play that was the sole thing he mentioned as causing it: his mastery of childish psychological head games was all he could come up with.) If he had not helped him develop by the end of his junior year, can you say what Lavin did between November and December - Pointer was his usual moribund self until New Year's Eve - to improve Pointer's play and can you explain why he didn't sooner.
Other than three point shooting can you name the ways in which Phil Greene improved as a player and what Steve Lavin did to effect that?
Do you think it is a coincidence that the only players who showed marked improvement under Lavin showed it in their senior year? If it is not a coincidence, why does Lavin deserve credit for it. Thanks.