Ncaa tourney

  • 389 replies
  • 43871 views
Re: Ncaa tourney
« Reply #260 on: March 28, 2016, 06:07:20 PM »
BS that they even made the tourney.

True, what's the point of discipline if they don't follow through on it? What's the point of having a rule book?

I'll always root for St Johns because that is what I have done doing back to Frank Alagia, George Johnson, Wayne McCoy, David Russell, et. etc. But the NCAA is just bullshit. As an organization it's as corrupt as any organization that we complain about in politics, private industry, the public sector, government. Very eye opening experience with Syracuse and North Carolina.

Marillac

  • *****
  • 11224
Re: Ncaa tourney
« Reply #261 on: March 28, 2016, 06:35:29 PM »
Gottlieb strikes again.  What a rocket scientist.  Tweeted something about the Big East shouldn't be able to take credit for Nova in the tournament.  This is the guy that said that gun rights were a chimera because the Bill of Rights were not a part of the constitution.

yea...pretty sure guys like Jenkins and Hart never played in the "Old Big East" and Arch and Ochefu only had 1 year in the "Old Big East"  And in the coming years when Brunson and Spellman are keeping Nova on top I wonder if the "New Big East" still won't get credit.

I dont even get his comment.  Almost wanted to reply...I guess the ACC doesn't get "credit" for Syracuse making the Final Four.

Django unchained!

redslope

  • *****
  • 1823
Re: Ncaa tourney
« Reply #262 on: March 28, 2016, 09:56:52 PM »
Louisville should have been in this year but they decided to do a SU and "self impose" a post season ban rather than wait for definite NCAA penalties.  They did not want to "hurt" future recruiting and through the current players under the bus, including some graduate school players who came to Louisville to go to post season.  If SU had waited rather than self impose would the frosh who scored 21 in second half have gone to SU and sit out this post season?????

Poison

  • *****
  • 16896
Re: Ncaa tourney
« Reply #263 on: March 29, 2016, 02:07:43 PM »
Louisville should have been in this year but they decided to do a SU and "self impose" a post season ban rather than wait for definite NCAA penalties.  They did not want to "hurt" future recruiting and through the current players under the bus, including some graduate school players who came to Louisville to go to post season.  If SU had waited rather than self impose would the frosh who scored 21 in second half have gone to SU and sit out this post season?????

Know who else did a self-imposed post season? St.John's. Why are we all of the sudden so clean? Louisville, Uconn and SU etc. How are we any different?

redslope

  • *****
  • 1823
Re: Ncaa tourney
« Reply #264 on: March 29, 2016, 04:39:38 PM »
Louisville should have been in this year but they decided to do a SU and "self impose" a post season ban rather than wait for definite NCAA penalties.  They did not want to "hurt" future recruiting and through the current players under the bus, including some graduate school players who came to Louisville to go to post season.  If SU had waited rather than self impose would the frosh who scored 21 in second half have gone to SU and sit out this post season?????

Know who else did a self-imposed post season? St.John's. Why are we all of the sudden so clean? Louisville, Uconn and SU etc. How are we any different?
We gave up multiple years of post season play
« Last Edit: March 29, 2016, 04:40:08 PM by redslope »

Re: Ncaa tourney
« Reply #265 on: March 29, 2016, 06:13:08 PM »
Louisville should have been in this year but they decided to do a SU and "self impose" a post season ban rather than wait for definite NCAA penalties.  They did not want to "hurt" future recruiting and through the current players under the bus, including some graduate school players who came to Louisville to go to post season.  If SU had waited rather than self impose would the frosh who scored 21 in second half have gone to SU and sit out this post season?????
Agree Redslope.  They should have given their current players a chance to transfer AFTER the tourney this year, so that they, and the current 5th year guys, would not have been the ones to suffer the consequences.  When the NCAA institutes the ban they always allow the current underclassmen to transfer w/o sitting a year.  With Pitino, they never got that chance. This was wrong of Pitino to do this.  And then Pitino, incomprehensibly, blames the NCAA for the 5th year guys not being able to play in the tourney when it was the schools idea to self impose the ban in the first place. You're supposed to give the current guys a chance to transfer. Not Rick.  He wanted to save another banner recruiting class. He said don't blame our President or AD, it is the NCAA's fault.  No Rick it's your fault!  And the media does not even call Slick Rick out on this.

This is yet another example of how clueless the NCAA is when they both write and enforce these rules. Notorious for their idiocy, they let certain schools get away with self imposing to protect their future teams and escape punishment.  SU would not have even made the tourney last year;  so where was the punishment?  You're supposed to give the KIDS a chance to transfer to protect the KIDS THEMSELVES. What's the matter with these people?  THEY give the kids a chance to transfer when THEY impose a ban, so why don't they make the schools wait a year when the SCHOOLS THEMSELVES self impose the ban?  This would protect the kids.  Stupidity bothers me a lot. 

They're so stupid.  Examples abound.  They are too dumb to write sensible rules and enforce them in a logical and consistent way.  Take the Monmouth bench mob for example.  The rules clearly prohibit premeditated celebrations.  Yet there they are on You Tube telling you how they choreograph their routines. "These are just college kids having  a good time" they said. Well then get rid of the rule. Nothing against Monmouth, I think they should have made the tourney, but you gotta enforce the rules or strike them from the books. There are many, many examples of the NCAA's incompetence. 
« Last Edit: March 29, 2016, 06:19:26 PM by WillieG »

Re: Ncaa tourney
« Reply #266 on: March 29, 2016, 06:17:01 PM »
Louisville should have been in this year but they decided to do a SU and "self impose" a post season ban rather than wait for definite NCAA penalties.  They did not want to "hurt" future recruiting and through the current players under the bus, including some graduate school players who came to Louisville to go to post season.  If SU had waited rather than self impose would the frosh who scored 21 in second half have gone to SU and sit out this post season?????

Know who else did a self-imposed post season? St.John's. Why are we all of the sudden so clean? Louisville, Uconn and SU etc. How are we any different?
Well, when we self imposed it was not to protect the next years team from not making the tourney.  We didn't make it for another eight or nine years.  We did it so that they would think the administration was being tough on the program. But now this self imposition of "punishment" thing has morphed into self protection lately.  Cuse and Ville are perfect examples of this.
« Last Edit: March 29, 2016, 06:21:38 PM by WillieG »

thetruth8734

  • ****
  • 613
  • SJU Alum
Re: Ncaa tourney
« Reply #267 on: April 02, 2016, 07:05:55 PM »
Nova up big at half. Would be big for the conference to get a team to the finals.

Re: Ncaa tourney
« Reply #268 on: April 02, 2016, 07:34:31 PM »
Nova up big at half. Would be big for the conference to get a team to the finals.
Would be much bigger to have a BE team win a championship. No one remembers the runner up except fans of that team. Actually people probably just remember who when to Final 4 than who finished second.

Re: Ncaa tourney
« Reply #269 on: April 02, 2016, 07:34:34 PM »
I love this kid Bridge's game

paultzman

  • *****
  • 16981
Re: Ncaa tourney
« Reply #270 on: April 02, 2016, 07:39:31 PM »
Nova D off the charts. Hart is old school mid range who just gets it done.

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: Ncaa tourney
« Reply #271 on: April 02, 2016, 07:45:28 PM »
Nova D off the charts. Hart is old school mid range who just gets it done.

You mean Ellison?
Remember who broke the Slice news

Re: Ncaa tourney
« Reply #272 on: April 02, 2016, 07:45:55 PM »
Nova D off the charts. Hart is old school mid range who just gets it done.
Seems like Nova has a pg in Arch, a big in Ochefu and 10 like guys who do a little bit of everything.

Re: Ncaa tourney
« Reply #273 on: April 02, 2016, 07:53:50 PM »
I never thought I would say this about a good team like Oklahoma and a terrific coach like Lon Kruger but Oklahoma has just quit. 

Mind you Nova made them quit but they quit.

Re: Ncaa tourney
« Reply #274 on: April 02, 2016, 08:25:38 PM »
So impressive, just do it one more time Nova.

redslope

  • *****
  • 1823
Re: Ncaa tourney
« Reply #275 on: April 02, 2016, 08:29:01 PM »
The best that could happen is that they do the same to Excuse in the final--but one way or another they will have to beat a cheater on Monday night.

Go NOVA--the BE is rooting for you.

Poison

  • *****
  • 16896
Re: Ncaa tourney
« Reply #276 on: April 02, 2016, 08:51:04 PM »
Louisville should have been in this year but they decided to do a SU and "self impose" a post season ban rather than wait for definite NCAA penalties.  They did not want to "hurt" future recruiting and through the current players under the bus, including some graduate school players who came to Louisville to go to post season.  If SU had waited rather than self impose would the frosh who scored 21 in second half have gone to SU and sit out this post season?????

Know who else did a self-imposed post season? St.John's. Why are we all of the sudden so clean? Louisville, Uconn and SU etc. How are we any different?
Well, when we self imposed it was not to protect the next years team from not making the tourney.  We didn't make it for another eight or nine years.  We did it so that they would think the administration was being tough on the program. But now this self imposition of "punishment" thing has morphed into self protection lately.  Cuse and Ville are perfect examples of this.

I do not see any difference. Not even a subtle difference.

Poison

  • *****
  • 16896
Re: Ncaa tourney
« Reply #277 on: April 02, 2016, 08:53:50 PM »
I don't think I've ever seen a FF team play such a dominant game.

boo3

  • *****
  • 6816
Re: Ncaa tourney
« Reply #278 on: April 02, 2016, 10:11:52 PM »
I don't think I've ever seen a FF team play such a dominant game.

 Probably because it hasn't happened, that I can remember.  Wow..

 Hoping UNC destroys Cuse...end this farce... UNC/NOVA is the game that should decide the champ

Re: Ncaa tourney
« Reply #279 on: April 02, 2016, 10:14:48 PM »
I don't think I've ever seen a FF team play such a dominant game.

 Probably because it hasn't happened, that I can remember.  Wow..

 Hoping UNC destroys Cuse...end this farce... UNC/NOVA is the game that should decide the champ
Yes, BE vs ACC for World Supremacy!  :)