6th Man of St. John's Basketball

St. John's Red Storm => In The Jungle... => Topic started by: TONYD3 on November 16, 2017, 09:48:10 PM

Title: Molloy
Post by: TONYD3 on November 16, 2017, 09:48:10 PM
They are division 2. Does it count for record? For at large selection?
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: thetruth8734 on November 16, 2017, 09:58:04 PM
Someone at the game tonight told me that it does count towards the record, but playing a division 2 opponent doesn't hurt your RPI, while playing a very bad division 1 team does. Not sure how true that is, but should be 4-0 headed to Orlando.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: TONYD3 on November 16, 2017, 10:00:33 PM
Someone at the game tonight told me that it does count towards the record, but playing a division 2 opponent doesn't hurt your RPI, while playing a very bad division 1 team does. Not sure how true that is, but should be 4-0 headed to Orlando.
Thanks . Great news
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: MCNPA on November 16, 2017, 10:00:40 PM
This is just a game to keep us warmed up til Oregon State...  not sure how it helps us but it is what it is.  Just stay healthy and come ready for Oregon State.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: RedStormNC on November 16, 2017, 10:13:01 PM
hope Yakwe gets decent minutes to help him try to turn it around ... with tourney coming with 3 games in 4 days, we'll need him to fill in minutes
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: ras on November 16, 2017, 10:13:34 PM
I don’t think a win counts for NCAA towny consideration. Another opportunity to work on weaknesses and give Trimble some time on the court. I think Mullin will giveYakwe  some nice minutes. We need him to contribute.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: TONYD3 on November 16, 2017, 10:14:10 PM
hope Yakwe gets decent minutes to help him try to turn it around ... with tourney coming with 3 games in 4 days, we'll need him to fill in minutes

That is a good point. Rest lovett and ponds plenty also
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: wpc77 on November 16, 2017, 10:22:38 PM
The Molloy game doesn't count towards RPI
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: HowCouldUBeSoHarkless on November 16, 2017, 10:24:48 PM
We played Franklin Pierce in season Lavins final year and it counted towards the record. I believe the selection committee just doesn't take it as a serious win.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: Celtics11 on November 16, 2017, 10:31:32 PM
We played Franklin Pierce in season Lavins final year and it counted towards the record. I believe the selection committee just doesn't take it as a serious win.
If things haven't changed over the years it counts on our overall record but the committee disregards it. In other words we can finish say 20-12 but the committee will consider us 19-12.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: goredmen on November 16, 2017, 11:16:28 PM
We played Franklin Pierce in season Lavins final year and it counted towards the record. I believe the selection committee just doesn't take it as a serious win.
If things haven't changed over the years it counts on our overall record but the committee disregards it. In other words we can finish say 20-12 but the committee will consider us 19-12.

The total number of wins doesn't make a whole lot of difference on the resume anyway. Otherwise 20 win high majors wouldn't be the ones at larges over 25 win mid majors
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: carmineabbatiello on November 17, 2017, 01:31:48 AM
It's an exhibition game.  Doesn't count.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: Celtics11 on November 17, 2017, 01:53:52 AM
It's an exhibition game.  Doesn't count.
Teams get to play a total of two combined exhibition or scrimmages. We already played an exhibition game and we scrimmaged Hofstra earlier so this is not an exhibition game. Nice try carmine perhaps you can come up with a nickname for this game that counts but doesn't count.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: carmineabbatiello on November 17, 2017, 09:11:06 AM
It's an exhibition game.  Doesn't count.
Teams get to play a total of two combined exhibition or scrimmages. We already played an exhibition game and we scrimmaged Hofstra earlier so this is not an exhibition game. Nice try carmine perhaps you can come up with a nickname for this game that counts but doesn't count.


Exhibitions.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: Poison on November 17, 2017, 09:26:56 AM
This game is senseless. Absolutely no reason play it at all. Are we playing them so that we can get ready for a season of D2 basketball?
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: pmg911 on November 20, 2017, 01:38:45 PM
It's an exhibition game.  Doesn't count.

Tonight is NOT an exhibition game...
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: Wods317 on November 20, 2017, 01:42:19 PM
Strange game but hopefully we can get a lot of burn for trimlble and Yakwe. There will be games where we will need those two to play well to win.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: carmineabbatiello on November 20, 2017, 02:43:25 PM
It's an exhibition game.  Doesn't count.

Tonight is NOT an exhibition game...

Friendly?
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: nudginator59 on November 20, 2017, 02:44:32 PM
It's an exhibition game.  Doesn't count.

Tonight is NOT an exhibition game...

Friendly?

A favor?
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: Gray Chudney on November 20, 2017, 02:56:49 PM
It's an exhibition game.  Doesn't count.

Tonight is NOT an exhibition game...

Friendly?

A favor?
Yeah we are doing them a favor by paying them to come to CA for a game that is not considered by the tournament selection committee.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: Marco Baldi on November 20, 2017, 02:58:14 PM
It's an exhibition game.  Doesn't count.

Tonight is NOT an exhibition game...

I'll be there. My nephew is playing at the half.

Molloy coach is a great Rockaway guy
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: we are sju on November 20, 2017, 04:26:11 PM
It's an exhibition game.  Doesn't count.

Tonight is NOT an exhibition game...

I'll be there. My nephew is playing at the half.

Molloy coach is a great Rockaway guy

Iona playing at the half?
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: goredmen on November 20, 2017, 05:09:08 PM
It's an exhibition game.  Doesn't count.

Tonight is NOT an exhibition game...

I'll be there. My nephew is playing at the half.

Molloy coach is a great Rockaway guy

Iona playing at the half?

The 8 year olds at halftime have far better defensive fundamentals than Iona
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: survivedc on November 20, 2017, 06:28:24 PM
Happy for an opportunity to work on some weaknesses here and there. I'd like to see some low post offense.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: ras on November 20, 2017, 06:34:24 PM
Is the game on tv or streamed anywhere?
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: mjdinkins on November 20, 2017, 06:34:33 PM
Sloppy start.  Little energy. 
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: mjdinkins on November 20, 2017, 06:36:16 PM
Mullin needs to call a timeout, and send LoVett and Ponds to the bench.  They think they're auditioning for the 'Trotters.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: Poison on November 20, 2017, 06:36:43 PM
Not a fan of that behind the back crap especially when there’s no need for it.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: mjdinkins on November 20, 2017, 06:40:07 PM
Not a fan of that behind the back crap especially when there’s no need for it.

Concur.  They look like garbage out there.  Most of Ponds' and LoVett's passes are being deflected, whether we end up with it or not.  Play with a killer instinct, regardless of the opposition.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: MCNPA on November 20, 2017, 06:44:05 PM
I think they’re just  having fun out there.  Definitely not taking it very seriously.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: mjdinkins on November 20, 2017, 06:45:58 PM
I think they’re just  having fun out there.  Definitely not taking it very seriously.

I know that's what they're doing, but I'm not fond of the BS'in, particularly so early in the game.  You kill a gnat with a sledgehammer.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: Poison on November 20, 2017, 06:47:44 PM
I think they’re just  having fun out there.  Definitely not taking it very seriously.

What’s the worst that could happen?
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: Poison on November 20, 2017, 06:49:05 PM
Year 4 and Alibegovic still doesn’t bother to box out.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: MCNPA on November 20, 2017, 06:51:29 PM
I think they’re just  having fun out there.  Definitely not taking it very seriously.

What’s the worst that could happen?

Nothing, it’s an exhibition.  And we aren’t gonna lose regardless...
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: mjdinkins on November 20, 2017, 06:52:03 PM
I think they’re just  having fun out there.  Definitely not taking it very seriously.

What’s the worst that could happen?

Now, you can sense Molloy is gaining confidence.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: mjdinkins on November 20, 2017, 06:58:11 PM
These kids watch too much tv (NBA).  I see often at high school games.  They're making routine layups difficult by trying to be too fancy.  That should've been an easy two for Simon. 
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: mjdinkins on November 20, 2017, 07:01:33 PM
Dumb alley oop attempt by Ponds.  He could've gotten Owens injured.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: redstorm212 on November 20, 2017, 07:03:50 PM
Can we at least open up a lead before we start trying to be unnecessarily flashy?
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: mjdinkins on November 20, 2017, 07:05:28 PM
Can we at least open up a lead before we start trying to be unnecessarily flashy?

+1 

Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: RedStormNC on November 20, 2017, 07:06:56 PM
Ugly all around. 


Need to tighten up ASAP and at least go into halftime with a lead.

Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: mjdinkins on November 20, 2017, 07:10:33 PM
Settling for jumpers and continue clanking.  Take the ball inside!

Stop with the difficult ally oop passes!
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: mjdinkins on November 20, 2017, 07:12:30 PM
They can't even play a zone.  That slow guard waltz right between Ponds and LoVett.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: ras on November 20, 2017, 07:21:52 PM
Very sloppy. Owens plays great D, but has a poor offensive game.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: Johnny23 on November 20, 2017, 07:26:10 PM
Ugly game. The rest of this week will be a good early season litmus test.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: Poison on November 20, 2017, 07:30:23 PM
They just screwed around for 20 minutes.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: TONYD3 on November 20, 2017, 07:32:17 PM
Mullin needs to call a timeout, and send LoVett and Ponds to the bench.  They think they're auditioning for the 'Trotters.
Mullin doesn’t call timeouts
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: TONYD3 on November 20, 2017, 07:32:56 PM
This is absolutely disgraceful
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: mjdinkins on November 20, 2017, 07:40:19 PM
Where's LoVett going? 
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: mjdinkins on November 20, 2017, 07:46:09 PM
Defense look much better this half.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: MCNPA on November 20, 2017, 07:48:46 PM
They were just messing around with this team.  They were never a threat. 
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: mjdinkins on November 20, 2017, 07:48:51 PM
Take out about 3 of the starters. 
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: mjdinkins on November 20, 2017, 07:50:42 PM
Clark fouls too much.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: MCNPA on November 20, 2017, 07:51:32 PM
Take out about 3 of the starters. 

Agree, get Ali b, Trimble etc in...
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: TONYD3 on November 20, 2017, 07:57:44 PM
Playing Amar with 2 other fowards is stupid. That’s what he did in 1st half. Amar is not a wing player. He needs to know that!
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: mjdinkins on November 20, 2017, 07:59:37 PM
Nice pass by Simon to Owens for the dunk.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: mjdinkins on November 20, 2017, 08:00:12 PM
If Yakwe could catch the ball cleanly, then that's an easy deuce.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: paultzman on November 20, 2017, 08:01:39 PM
Meaningless game, hard to get up for, but way too much schoolyard nonsense.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: Marillac on November 20, 2017, 08:06:53 PM
Sloppy game. Molloy shows bad fundamentals for a d-2 program...one-on-one and don't get back on defense at all. Hopefully this game doesn't hurt us going forward.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: mjdinkins on November 20, 2017, 08:07:45 PM
Yakwe couldn't catch the flu, if you stuck him in a room with two-dozen flu patients.

Tennis balls, son.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: MCNPA on November 20, 2017, 08:11:35 PM
Yakwe couldn't catch the flu, if you stuck him in a room with two-dozen flu patients.

Tennis balls, son.

Well Josh Roberts a far cry from Yakwe... plays inside, bigger and with good hands.  Played wideout in Alabama for the football team at 6’8” a year or two ago and can catch the ball!
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: Marillac on November 20, 2017, 08:11:51 PM
At least Lovett and Ponds get to sit the last ten. 
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: mjdinkins on November 20, 2017, 08:14:09 PM
Good defense there by Simon.  Trimble should've pump faked that Molloy defender.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: redstorm212 on November 20, 2017, 08:15:36 PM
Pretty ugly game. I don't think it's great to play this low level of competition after the season starts.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: Marillac on November 20, 2017, 08:21:09 PM
Pretty ugly game. I don't think it's great to play this low level of competition after the season starts.

It's not. If you do then you want it to be against smart teams with good fundamentals so it doesn't become this.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: Foad on November 20, 2017, 09:06:19 PM
This is absolutely disgraceful

Agree, they only won by 29, that's ridiculous. I was expecting at least3 0.

Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: Marco Baldi on November 20, 2017, 09:12:19 PM
Probably the last game I will ever go to aT that dump of a place.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: braintrust on November 20, 2017, 09:15:59 PM
Actually, Mullin can turn this into an attention getter when they watch film tomorrow. Too much carelessness, especially after a big win over Nebraska.

If they were going into Oregon State too confident, this should knock them down a couple of pegs. Get the Nebraska win out of their heads and focus that they do have to work to be successful.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: Marco Baldi on November 20, 2017, 09:41:01 PM
Clark and Owens both with 4 rebounds. Great job outta them
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: capmaker on November 20, 2017, 09:45:57 PM
https://nypost.com/2017/11/20/st-johns-coasts-to-victory-in-ugliest-possible-fashion/
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: cjfish on November 20, 2017, 09:51:32 PM
poor 3 point shooting starting to be a trend, hope it doesn't continue
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: ras on November 20, 2017, 09:54:54 PM
Playing Amar with 2 other fowards is stupid. That’s what he did in 1st half. Amar is not a wing player. He needs to know that!
He thinks he’s a wing player. But I don’t understand having him play the 3 . We need banging and rebounds from him. W Bash and Simon and Trimble and Clark , he should never play the 3 . I think our best lineup is our starting lineup. Clark has to work on fouling less.    If I’m not mistaken Ponds was the only starter to make a 3. As usual Simon and Ponds the leading rebounder. Really like Simon, knows his limitations. 11 boards something like 9 assists. Glad we got Yakwe and Trimble playing time But they didn’t impress. Amar wasn’t  bad. Not much to take from the his game.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: Celtics11 on November 20, 2017, 10:03:41 PM
This is absolutely disgraceful

Agree, they only won by 29, that's ridiculous. I was expecting at least3 0.
Big effin deal this Molloy team would lose by 30 to Archbishop Molloy. I would call it a glorified scrimmage or a high school game but there was nothing glorified about it. Best thing about this game is it will allow coaching staff to get their attention and hopefully give them the incentive to redeem themselves. This team and program hasn't accomplished squat not to play hard all the time and take every game seriously. Instead they sleepwalked and lallygagged their way through the game.


Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: Marco Baldi on November 20, 2017, 10:04:32 PM
Playing Amar with 2 other fowards is stupid. That’s what he did in 1st half. Amar is not a wing player. He needs to know that!
He thinks he’s a wing player. But I don’t understand having him play the 3 . We need banging and rebounds from him. W Bash and Simon and Trimble and Clark , he should never play the 3 . I think our best lineup is our starting lineup. Clark has to work on fouling less.

Clark is not good right now
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: wpc77 on November 20, 2017, 10:08:21 PM
Playing Amar with 2 other fowards is stupid. That’s what he did in 1st half. Amar is not a wing player. He needs to know that!
He thinks he’s a wing player. But I don’t understand having him play the 3 . We need banging and rebounds from him. W Bash and Simon and Trimble and Clark , he should never play the 3 . I think our best lineup is our starting lineup. Clark has to work on fouling less.

Clark is not good right now

Who is the big man coach for this team?
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: Celtics11 on November 20, 2017, 10:09:58 PM
Playing Amar with 2 other fowards is stupid. That’s what he did in 1st half. Amar is not a wing player. He needs to know that!
He thinks he’s a wing player. But I don’t understand having him play the 3 . We need banging and rebounds from him. W Bash and Simon and Trimble and Clark , he should never play the 3 . I think our best lineup is our starting lineup. Clark has to work on fouling less.

Clark is not good right now

Who is the big man coach for this team?
Peter Dinklage.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: Marco Baldi on November 20, 2017, 10:12:49 PM
Playing Amar with 2 other fowards is stupid. That’s what he did in 1st half. Amar is not a wing player. He needs to know that!
He thinks he’s a wing player. But I don’t understand having him play the 3 . We need banging and rebounds from him. W Bash and Simon and Trimble and Clark , he should never play the 3 . I think our best lineup is our starting lineup. Clark has to work on fouling less.

Clark is not good right now

Who is the big man coach for this team?

Is he supposed to be a big?
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: wpc77 on November 20, 2017, 10:22:50 PM
Playing Amar with 2 other fowards is stupid. That’s what he did in 1st half. Amar is not a wing player. He needs to know that!
He thinks he’s a wing player. But I don’t understand having him play the 3 . We need banging and rebounds from him. W Bash and Simon and Trimble and Clark , he should never play the 3 . I think our best lineup is our starting lineup. Clark has to work on fouling less.

Clark is not good right now

Who is the big man coach for this team?

Is he supposed to be a big?

I suppose so, by process of elimination.   Wither Zendon? I know he was a knucklehead , but still...
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: RedStormNC on November 20, 2017, 11:27:46 PM
Post game quotes

http://www.redstormsports.com/sports/m-baskbl/spec-rel/112017aac.html
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: HowCouldUBeSoHarkless on November 20, 2017, 11:52:45 PM
Hopefully good to get the stinker out of the way in this game.

Best part of the game was tracking Simon to see if he could get the triple double in the final minutes before Mullin would remove him.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: MCNPA on November 21, 2017, 12:33:25 AM
poor 3 point shooting starting to be a trend, hope it doesn't continue

We are 4-0 and haven’t shot well, but our defense and rebounding have been a ton better.  Frankly I’m more worried about that.  We keep improving our defense and rebounding, it’s whwre our bread is at...  we have plenty offense and our shooting will only get better.   Change our game style from the defense/rebounding on up and I’m fine with it.  We have tons of scorers, even if we aren’t shooting like we should.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: Poison on November 21, 2017, 12:43:47 AM
Playing Amar with 2 other fowards is stupid. That’s what he did in 1st half. Amar is not a wing player. He needs to know that!
He thinks he’s a wing player. But I don’t understand having him play the 3 . We need banging and rebounds from him. W Bash and Simon and Trimble and Clark , he should never play the 3 . I think our best lineup is our starting lineup. Clark has to work on fouling less.

Clark is not good right now

Clark isn’t good yet, but he’s above average. What bothers me is that he thinks he’s a guard, and that’s absolutely not what the team needs from him. It’s been 4 games, and if he’s our weakest starting player, that’s not so bad.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: Amaseinyourface2 on November 21, 2017, 05:32:22 AM
Playing Amar with 2 other fowards is stupid. That’s what he did in 1st half. Amar is not a wing player. He needs to know that!
He thinks he’s a wing player. But I don’t understand having him play the 3 . We need banging and rebounds from him. W Bash and Simon and Trimble and Clark , he should never play the 3 . I think our best lineup is our starting lineup. Clark has to work on fouling less.

Clark is not good right now

Clark isn’t good yet, but he’s above average. What bothers me is that he thinks he’s a guard, and that’s absolutely not what the team needs from him. It’s been 4 games, and if he’s our weakest starting player, that’s not so bad.

In 23 minutes he's getting 9 points 4 rbs and shooting 57% from the floor. Sure he needs to rebound a little more but on this team his role is to box out and allow Simon and ponds to swoop in. My only concern is the fouls.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: MCNPA on November 21, 2017, 08:42:43 AM
Clark is very good, but still learning his role.  He had one awesome move yesterday where he posted his man, turned and took s short range jumper.  He's an efficient player, but needs to play more of a PF role.  He can surely take open treys, because he's a good shooter, but he's gotta be eating people alive inside like Ricardo Gathers style.  He can do it, especially with his skill set.  The fouls will improve over time methinks.  He's gotta just move his feet more on defense and not reach.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: Foad on November 21, 2017, 10:24:08 AM
  You kill a gnat with a sledgehammer.

You'd be hard pressed to find a stupider way to try and kill a gnat than with a sledgehammer.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: TONYD3 on November 21, 2017, 10:50:20 AM
  You kill a gnat with a sledgehammer.

You'd be hard pressed to find a stupider way to try and kill a gnat than with a sledgehammer.
Foady- who is in your profile picture?
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: redslope on November 21, 2017, 12:48:20 PM
Before going off the deep end think of the following 6 words, "Thomas Aquinas, Incarnate Word, Delaware State".  This is not the last two years when team would not respond to this level of opponent.  They obviously got the message at half time with a 22-2 run to open 2nd half; something we did not see in last 2 years.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: we are sju on November 21, 2017, 12:49:54 PM
Playing Amar with 2 other fowards is stupid. That’s what he did in 1st half. Amar is not a wing player. He needs to know that!
He thinks he’s a wing player. But I don’t understand having him play the 3 . We need banging and rebounds from him. W Bash and Simon and Trimble and Clark , he should never play the 3 . I think our best lineup is our starting lineup. Clark has to work on fouling less.

Clark is not good right now

Clark isn’t good yet, but he’s above average. What bothers me is that he thinks he’s a guard, and that’s absolutely not what the team needs from him. It’s been 4 games, and if he’s our weakest starting player, that’s not so bad.

In 23 minutes he's getting 9 points 4 rbs and shooting 57% from the floor. Sure he needs to rebound a little more but on this team his role is to box out and allow Simon and ponds to swoop in. My only concern is the fouls.

4 games but I am a little disappointed by his play so far. Especially on the boards. Funny he looked wider while at Michigan ST. Maybe food at ST John's is terrible to go along with lack of weight room? BTW I think he will be fine but did think he would have more of an  immediate impact.

On other hand love Simon even if he can't shoot.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: we are sju on November 21, 2017, 12:58:17 PM
Is anyone else concerned that after 4 games Amar is clearly better than Yakwe? Has anyone confirmed that Yakwe is not a zombie version of himself? Because if he is it should probably be dealt with sooner rather than later.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: survivedc on November 21, 2017, 01:23:00 PM
Is anyone else concerned that after 4 games Amar is clearly better than Yakwe? Has anyone confirmed that Yakwe is not a zombie version of himself? Because if he is it should probably be dealt with sooner rather than later.

Is he? Has looked pretty unimpressive to me. Yakwe has shown some energy here and there.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: we are sju on November 21, 2017, 01:29:36 PM
Is anyone else concerned that after 4 games Amar is clearly better than Yakwe? Has anyone confirmed that Yakwe is not a zombie version of himself? Because if he is it should probably be dealt with sooner rather than later.

Is he? Has looked pretty unimpressive to me. Yakwe has shown some energy here and there.

Was not meant as a compliment to Amar
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: carmineabbatiello on November 21, 2017, 04:51:39 PM
I like Clark. 

He's the team's vocal leader.  His arms are jacked.  The addition of he and Simon are the most logical reasons for the teams improved defensive effort.

He's a big piece of our puzzle moving forward.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: Foad on November 21, 2017, 04:57:26 PM
  You kill a gnat with a sledgehammer.

You'd be hard pressed to find a stupider way to try and kill a gnat than with a sledgehammer.
Foady- who is in your profile picture?

Patricia Krenwinkle
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: Celtics11 on November 21, 2017, 05:06:21 PM
Before going off the deep end think of the following 6 words, "Thomas Aquinas, Incarnate Word, Delaware State".  This is not the last two years when team would not respond to this level of opponent.  They obviously got the message at half time with a 22-2 run to open 2nd half; something we did not see in last 2 years.
Think the increase in talent level has more to do with it. Really don't understand comparing this team to two years ago when we were a complete joke. Like saying my four year old is toilet trained where two years ago he would have shit in his pants.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: gray49 on November 21, 2017, 05:57:37 PM
Patricia Krenwinkle...Yikes!!!
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: ras on November 23, 2017, 12:45:01 PM
If anyone wants to know f this hame counts. Just looked up our RPI around 28. Has us w a 3-0 record not 4-0.
Title: Re: Molloy
Post by: HowCouldUBeSoHarkless on November 23, 2017, 12:47:25 PM
If anyone wants to know f this hame counts. Just looked up our RPI around 28. Has us w a 3-0 record not 4-0.

I mean we've been over this. It counts for stats and technical record but not for the selection committee.