BETHUNE/COOKMAN

Lets Get back to what really matters--Redmen basketball.  Late night this Friday--do we blow them out or is it a nail biter.  If I'm gonna be out that late we better win and win by 20.

For some reason not seeing this game on my TV listings here in Maryland.  Is FS2 regional?

Use the Fox Sports Go App on your phone, tablet or Apple TV.  You can access all the Fox Sports stations and watch the game on FS2.

I'll go with Johnnies 78, Bethune Cookman 55. They have very little talent. Maybe a point guard who can get hot from 3 occasionally, but that's really it.

I'll go with Johnnies 78, Bethune Cookman 55. They have very little talent. Maybe a point guard who can get hot from 3 occasionally, but that's really it.

After last year. I will believe it when I see it. 78-55 will get make more positive. Blowout would be nice.

Quote from: Poison on November 09, 2016, 05:24:41 PM

I'll go with Johnnies 78, Bethune Cookman 55. They have very little talent. Maybe a point guard who can get hot from 3 occasionally, but that's really it.

After last year. I will believe it when I see it. 78-55 will get make more positive. Blowout would be nice.

This is Bethune Cookman. Not NJIT or Fordham.

Quote from: TONYD3 on November 09, 2016, 08:18:19 PM

Quote from: Poison on November 09, 2016, 05:24:41 PM

I'll go with Johnnies 78, Bethune Cookman 55. They have very little talent. Maybe a point guard who can get hot from 3 occasionally, but that's really it.

After last year. I will believe it when I see it. 78-55 will get make more positive. Blowout would be nice.

This is Bethune Cookman. Not NJIT or Fordham.

NJIT is not good, was never good, and will never be good. We should have beaten them last year.We had  PLENTY of talent to beat them.

Game has been switched from FS2 to the YES Network.

Quote from: Poison on November 09, 2016, 09:24:52 PM

Quote from: TONYD3 on November 09, 2016, 08:18:19 PM

Quote from: Poison on November 09, 2016, 05:24:41 PM

I'll go with Johnnies 78, Bethune Cookman 55. They have very little talent. Maybe a point guard who can get hot from 3 occasionally, but that's really it.

After last year. I will believe it when I see it. 78-55 will get make more positive. Blowout would be nice.

This is Bethune Cookman. Not NJIT or Fordham.

NJIT is not good, was never good, and will never be good. We should have beaten them last year.We had  PLENTY of talent to beat them.

They were more talented than us last year. So was Fordham.

Quote from: TONYD3 on November 09, 2016, 09:34:51 PM

Quote from: Poison on November 09, 2016, 09:24:52 PM

Quote from: TONYD3 on November 09, 2016, 08:18:19 PM

Quote from: Poison on November 09, 2016, 05:24:41 PM

I'll go with Johnnies 78, Bethune Cookman 55. They have very little talent. Maybe a point guard who can get hot from 3 occasionally, but that's really it.

After last year. I will believe it when I see it. 78-55 will get make more positive. Blowout would be nice.

This is Bethune Cookman. Not NJIT or Fordham.

NJIT is not good, was never good, and will never be good. We should have beaten them last year.We had  PLENTY of talent to beat them.

They were more talented than us last year. So was Fordham.

You are wrong about last year--given the record your list is too short. .

Quote from: Poison on November 09, 2016, 11:15:35 PM

Quote from: TONYD3 on November 09, 2016, 09:34:51 PM

Quote from: Poison on November 09, 2016, 09:24:52 PM

Quote from: TONYD3 on November 09, 2016, 08:18:19 PM

Quote from: Poison on November 09, 2016, 05:24:41 PM

I'll go with Johnnies 78, Bethune Cookman 55. They have very little talent. Maybe a point guard who can get hot from 3 occasionally, but that's really it.

After last year. I will believe it when I see it. 78-55 will get make more positive. Blowout would be nice.

This is Bethune Cookman. Not NJIT or Fordham.

NJIT is not good, was never good, and will never be good. We should have beaten them last year.We had  PLENTY of talent to beat them.

They were more talented than us last year. So was Fordham.

You are wrong about last year--given the record your list is too short. .

I said we would be terrible last year. We were. We got rid of some terrible players, and it appears we've added some capable ones. But that has nothing to do w how bad BC is. They are terrible.

Good Luck fellas!

Here's hoping you all get the kind of season you deserve.

May a bright future for the Johnnies be right around the corner!

Quote from: redslope on November 09, 2016, 11:40:08 PM

Quote from: Poison on November 09, 2016, 11:15:35 PM

Quote from: TONYD3 on November 09, 2016, 09:34:51 PM

Quote from: Poison on November 09, 2016, 09:24:52 PM

Quote from: TONYD3 on November 09, 2016, 08:18:19 PM

Quote from: Poison on November 09, 2016, 05:24:41 PM

I'll go with Johnnies 78, Bethune Cookman 55. They have very little talent. Maybe a point guard who can get hot from 3 occasionally, but that's really it.

After last year. I will believe it when I see it. 78-55 will get make more positive. Blowout would be nice.

This is Bethune Cookman. Not NJIT or Fordham.

NJIT is not good, was never good, and will never be good. We should have beaten them last year.We had  PLENTY of talent to beat them.

They were more talented than us last year. So was Fordham.

You are wrong about last year--given the record your list is too short. .

I said we would be terrible last year. We were. We got rid of some terrible players, and it appears we've added some capable ones. But that has nothing to do w how bad BC is. They are terrible.

Good to get that first win, but we need to keep this game & other softies in perspective for sure. The Michigan State, second round game in Bahamas, Cuse, Minnesota & Penn State should give us something to evaluate & hopefully build on.

I'll go with Johnnies 78, Bethune Cookman 55. They have very little talent. Maybe a point guard who can get hot from 3 occasionally, but that's really it.

I just looked them up. Your right . They are really bad. 78-55 sounds right.