You're arguing with yourself at this point. You have a tendency of making a point but then overstepping it and talking in circles.
I said my piece. I'm giving the coach credit for developing one of his players. You really should try it sometime too. It's ok to give him a little credit. Don't worry, no one will think any less of you if you do. Enough of the petty bs, back to talking hoops.
You didn’t just knock Earlington. You were literally his biggest detractor from the moment he committed, through his entire freshman season (calling him “clearly over his head at this level”) to ripping him in game threads early last season. You have dozens of posts about how bad he was.
To make it worse, you claimed to be “very familiar with Earlington and the Bosco program” so you can’t even claim you didn’t see him. You also wiffed badly on his Bosco teammate Harper Jr., mocking me for saying he was clearly a top 100 player in spite of his lower ranking by saying he was a backup caliber. Harper averaged 12.1 and 5.8 for a good Rutgers team as a soph.
You: “My opinion of him being a stretch for SJU to recruit won't really change.” Now in 2020 you want to lecture the board on his development. Is this a goddamn simulation?
In separate posts you called Earlington “flatfooted,” “maybe a two star at best,” “a poor use of a scholly, and “a severely undersized 4.”
Nothing you say about Earlington will ever carry any weight you tool.
You are either a world class troll or your IQ is more 80s than a Monster Ballads album.