The Influence of Well-In Boosters with this Coaching Carousel

Not for nothing but with the struggles that we had as a program and the up and down bumps we have had over the past decade plus brings some thoughts to mind. On the outside, it appears that there were likely pushes for Lavin and Mullin by connected alumni with deep pockets etc. for those big moves to happen.

 Now with Anderson- do you think there was any "push" so to speak for him and his career of mediocrity? I just wonder because how this has all played out since Mullin just appears to be a school without a true desire to consistently win and do you think if the big pockets pushed Prez and AD something better could be done?

Who really has the power?

Who really has the power?

The Jews, duh.

Foad is the best!

Not for nothing but with the struggles that we had as a program and the up and down bumps we have had over the past decade plus brings some thoughts to mind. On the outside, it appears that there were likely pushes for Lavin and Mullin by connected alumni with deep pockets etc. for those big moves to happen.

 Now with Anderson- do you think there was any "push" so to speak for him and his career of mediocrity? I just wonder because how this has all played out since Mullin just appears to be a school without a true desire to consistently win and do you think if the big pockets pushed Prez and AD something better could be done?

Who really has the power?

There were zero "boosters" pushing for Anderson. Some people were behind Bobby Hurley and Porter Moser once Mullin moved on, but believe it or not the more influential donors wanted  him to get an extension and add to his staff.

The only reason Anderson's leash will be a bit longer is because of Mike Cragg. He is well liked by administration.