Based on what others have said, seems to me that he is going to end up at Seton Hall. Rutgers has Mack, who will be good next year (not sure who East Coast bias thinks is there other PG, because Carter isn't one IMO). And I don't know who East Coast bias believes is Hall's PG. I don't see one.
Well I give up.If you want 4 year kids the 14 and 15 classes will provide opportunities.I want to win big and have superior talent. MCW stays 2 years but you get Ennis.
Quote from: fordham96 on March 18, 2013, 10:22:40 PMWell I give up.If you want 4 year kids the 14 and 15 classes will provide opportunities.I want to win big and have superior talent. MCW stays 2 years but you get Ennis. Hey we each have opinions and favorites. I don't think Jordan wants to be in college for very long. Great talent but joining an already crowded backcourt he's going to want his shots out of the gate.
Quote from: Moose on March 18, 2013, 10:24:43 PMQuote from: fordham96 on March 18, 2013, 10:22:40 PMWell I give up.If you want 4 year kids the 14 and 15 classes will provide opportunities.I want to win big and have superior talent. MCW stays 2 years but you get Ennis. Hey we each have opinions and favorites. I don't think Jordan wants to be in college for very long. Great talent but joining an already crowded backcourt he's going to want his shots out of the gate.How long is not too long, 2 years? Would you take Mudiay? That kid is 1 and done definitely.
Quote from: fordham96 on March 18, 2013, 10:29:05 PMQuote from: Moose on March 18, 2013, 10:24:43 PMQuote from: fordham96 on March 18, 2013, 10:22:40 PMWell I give up.If you want 4 year kids the 14 and 15 classes will provide opportunities.I want to win big and have superior talent. MCW stays 2 years but you get Ennis. Hey we each have opinions and favorites. I don't think Jordan wants to be in college for very long. Great talent but joining an already crowded backcourt he's going to want his shots out of the gate.How long is not too long, 2 years? Would you take Mudiay? That kid is 1 and done definitely.Yeah I'd take Mudiay but he's on another level from Jordan to me. Jordan isn't an McDonalds AA. Mudiay is. Hardly the end all be all factor but it drives home my point.I want to build a roster. I just don't want to grab these kids just to grab these kids because they are athletic freaks. Give me some smarter players on the court. I want to build a team.
Quote from: Moose on March 18, 2013, 10:32:56 PMQuote from: fordham96 on March 18, 2013, 10:29:05 PMQuote from: Moose on March 18, 2013, 10:24:43 PMQuote from: fordham96 on March 18, 2013, 10:22:40 PMWell I give up.If you want 4 year kids the 14 and 15 classes will provide opportunities.I want to win big and have superior talent. MCW stays 2 years but you get Ennis. Hey we each have opinions and favorites. I don't think Jordan wants to be in college for very long. Great talent but joining an already crowded backcourt he's going to want his shots out of the gate.How long is not too long, 2 years? Would you take Mudiay? That kid is 1 and done definitely.Yeah I'd take Mudiay but he's on another level from Jordan to me. Jordan isn't an McDonalds AA. Mudiay is. Hardly the end all be all factor but it drives home my point.I want to build a roster. I just don't want to grab these kids just to grab these kids because they are athletic freaks. Give me some smarter players on the court. I want to build a team.
Quote from: Moose on March 18, 2013, 10:34:01 PMQuote from: Moose on March 18, 2013, 10:32:56 PMQuote from: fordham96 on March 18, 2013, 10:29:05 PMQuote from: Moose on March 18, 2013, 10:24:43 PMQuote from: fordham96 on March 18, 2013, 10:22:40 PMWell I give up.If you want 4 year kids the 14 and 15 classes will provide opportunities.I want to win big and have superior talent. MCW stays 2 years but you get Ennis. Hey we each have opinions and favorites. I don't think Jordan wants to be in college for very long. Great talent but joining an already crowded backcourt he's going to want his shots out of the gate.How long is not too long, 2 years? Would you take Mudiay? That kid is 1 and done definitely.Yeah I'd take Mudiay but he's on another level from Jordan to me. Jordan isn't an McDonalds AA. Mudiay is. Hardly the end all be all factor but it drives home my point.I want to build a roster. I just don't want to grab these kids just to grab these kids because they are athletic freaks. Give me some smarter players on the court. I want to build a team.Jordan is a 5 star kid and can start immediately. But here is my my point. SJU has Greene, Jones, Balamou, Branch and JUCOs. There is no evidence to suggest just because Lavin pursues Jordan over Sina that somehow he is sacrificing the future for now. First off Jordan is not a 1 and done. Which means he is at least a 2 year player. Everyone is using the premise that pursuing Jordan over Sina assumes that is what Lavin wants to do. That IMHO is a false premise. Lavin is pursuing Jordan for the same reason Temple and UCLA are because he is an immediate impact player. And I like that philosophy.Not against Sina other then he is very limited other then as a good shooter. He doesn't make them better next year and there are plenty of Sina's in 14 and 15. There aren't plenty of Jordan's.
Quote from: fordham96 on March 18, 2013, 10:49:47 PMQuote from: Moose on March 18, 2013, 10:34:01 PMQuote from: Moose on March 18, 2013, 10:32:56 PMQuote from: fordham96 on March 18, 2013, 10:29:05 PMQuote from: Moose on March 18, 2013, 10:24:43 PMQuote from: fordham96 on March 18, 2013, 10:22:40 PMWell I give up.If you want 4 year kids the 14 and 15 classes will provide opportunities.I want to win big and have superior talent. MCW stays 2 years but you get Ennis. Hey we each have opinions and favorites. I don't think Jordan wants to be in college for very long. Great talent but joining an already crowded backcourt he's going to want his shots out of the gate.How long is not too long, 2 years? Would you take Mudiay? That kid is 1 and done definitely.Yeah I'd take Mudiay but he's on another level from Jordan to me. Jordan isn't an McDonalds AA. Mudiay is. Hardly the end all be all factor but it drives home my point.I want to build a roster. I just don't want to grab these kids just to grab these kids because they are athletic freaks. Give me some smarter players on the court. I want to build a team.Jordan is a 5 star kid and can start immediately. But here is my my point. SJU has Greene, Jones, Balamou, Branch and JUCOs. There is no evidence to suggest just because Lavin pursues Jordan over Sina that somehow he is sacrificing the future for now. First off Jordan is not a 1 and done. Which means he is at least a 2 year player. Everyone is using the premise that pursuing Jordan over Sina assumes that is what Lavin wants to do. That IMHO is a false premise. Lavin is pursuing Jordan for the same reason Temple and UCLA are because he is an immediate impact player. And I like that philosophy.Not against Sina other then he is very limited other then as a good shooter. He doesn't make them better next year and there are plenty of Sina's in 14 and 15. There aren't plenty of Jordan's.Interesting group of guys you listed there. Left out Harrison for instance.I disagree on Sina as I think he is a good distributor of the ball. Hey if Harrison aint around we'd have room for both guys. I'm not confident in any player that highly rated being around two years. Basing it off history of players leaving and quotes from this kid who wants to play at the next level and soon.There are plenty of Sina's and Jordan's in '14. We just arent listed with them, or have been My preference if given the choice (and Harrison back) is Sina.
Quote from: Moose on March 18, 2013, 10:55:56 PMQuote from: fordham96 on March 18, 2013, 10:49:47 PMQuote from: Moose on March 18, 2013, 10:34:01 PMQuote from: Moose on March 18, 2013, 10:32:56 PMQuote from: fordham96 on March 18, 2013, 10:29:05 PMQuote from: Moose on March 18, 2013, 10:24:43 PMQuote from: fordham96 on March 18, 2013, 10:22:40 PMWell I give up.If you want 4 year kids the 14 and 15 classes will provide opportunities.I want to win big and have superior talent. MCW stays 2 years but you get Ennis. Hey we each have opinions and favorites. I don't think Jordan wants to be in college for very long. Great talent but joining an already crowded backcourt he's going to want his shots out of the gate.How long is not too long, 2 years? Would you take Mudiay? That kid is 1 and done definitely.Yeah I'd take Mudiay but he's on another level from Jordan to me. Jordan isn't an McDonalds AA. Mudiay is. Hardly the end all be all factor but it drives home my point.I want to build a roster. I just don't want to grab these kids just to grab these kids because they are athletic freaks. Give me some smarter players on the court. I want to build a team.Jordan is a 5 star kid and can start immediately. But here is my my point. SJU has Greene, Jones, Balamou, Branch and JUCOs. There is no evidence to suggest just because Lavin pursues Jordan over Sina that somehow he is sacrificing the future for now. First off Jordan is not a 1 and done. Which means he is at least a 2 year player. Everyone is using the premise that pursuing Jordan over Sina assumes that is what Lavin wants to do. That IMHO is a false premise. Lavin is pursuing Jordan for the same reason Temple and UCLA are because he is an immediate impact player. And I like that philosophy.Not against Sina other then he is very limited other then as a good shooter. He doesn't make them better next year and there are plenty of Sina's in 14 and 15. There aren't plenty of Jordan's.Interesting group of guys you listed there. Left out Harrison for instance.I disagree on Sina as I think he is a good distributor of the ball. Hey if Harrison aint around we'd have room for both guys. I'm not confident in any player that highly rated being around two years. Basing it off history of players leaving and quotes from this kid who wants to play at the next level and soon.There are plenty of Sina's and Jordan's in '14. We just arent listed with them, or have been My preference if given the choice (and Harrison back) is Sina.Carrington is better then Sina and better for us and he is a 4 year player.There are 5 or 6 Jordan's and there are 15-20 Sina's. He isn't even top 100.Time to go to sleep....lol!
Quote from: fordham96 on March 18, 2013, 11:01:11 PMQuote from: Moose on March 18, 2013, 10:55:56 PMQuote from: fordham96 on March 18, 2013, 10:49:47 PMQuote from: Moose on March 18, 2013, 10:34:01 PMQuote from: Moose on March 18, 2013, 10:32:56 PMQuote from: fordham96 on March 18, 2013, 10:29:05 PMQuote from: Moose on March 18, 2013, 10:24:43 PMQuote from: fordham96 on March 18, 2013, 10:22:40 PMWell I give up.If you want 4 year kids the 14 and 15 classes will provide opportunities.I want to win big and have superior talent. MCW stays 2 years but you get Ennis. Hey we each have opinions and favorites. I don't think Jordan wants to be in college for very long. Great talent but joining an already crowded backcourt he's going to want his shots out of the gate.How long is not too long, 2 years? Would you take Mudiay? That kid is 1 and done definitely.Yeah I'd take Mudiay but he's on another level from Jordan to me. Jordan isn't an McDonalds AA. Mudiay is. Hardly the end all be all factor but it drives home my point.I want to build a roster. I just don't want to grab these kids just to grab these kids because they are athletic freaks. Give me some smarter players on the court. I want to build a team.Jordan is a 5 star kid and can start immediately. But here is my my point. SJU has Greene, Jones, Balamou, Branch and JUCOs. There is no evidence to suggest just because Lavin pursues Jordan over Sina that somehow he is sacrificing the future for now. First off Jordan is not a 1 and done. Which means he is at least a 2 year player. Everyone is using the premise that pursuing Jordan over Sina assumes that is what Lavin wants to do. That IMHO is a false premise. Lavin is pursuing Jordan for the same reason Temple and UCLA are because he is an immediate impact player. And I like that philosophy.Not against Sina other then he is very limited other then as a good shooter. He doesn't make them better next year and there are plenty of Sina's in 14 and 15. There aren't plenty of Jordan's.Interesting group of guys you listed there. Left out Harrison for instance.I disagree on Sina as I think he is a good distributor of the ball. Hey if Harrison aint around we'd have room for both guys. I'm not confident in any player that highly rated being around two years. Basing it off history of players leaving and quotes from this kid who wants to play at the next level and soon.There are plenty of Sina's and Jordan's in '14. We just arent listed with them, or have been My preference if given the choice (and Harrison back) is Sina.Carrington is better then Sina and better for us and he is a 4 year player.There are 5 or 6 Jordan's and there are 15-20 Sina's. He isn't even top 100.Time to go to sleep....lol!No way is Carrington better than Sina. Wow.But yes Carrington does fit in better since he can join the gang that can't shoot.Trey Burke was 142Goodnight
“@AdamZagoria: St. John's is not involved with PG Jaren Sina, hia father tells @SNYtv. Johnnies focused on @sheedjordan for 2013”
From ESPN scouting:"Sina is a super skilled guard with a lethal jumpshot. He has an effortless stroke which is automatic when in rhythm from anywhere inside 25 feet...He is a pinpoint passer, and has a tremendously high basketball IQ."I want him on this team.
Sounds like an deal back up plan if Jordan goes elsewhere. Dave, PMG, and Fordham seem pretty confident he isn't a BE player, so I'll defer to them. Sorry Moose. I've never seen the kid play, so tough for me to kill staff for not going after him.