Just wondering. Not trying to start a war just want to know honest opinion from all not just the OP.
Special 4 year player- Should a guy like Dom who was Top 50 be a special 4 year player? Shouldn't they be special a lot sooner than that?
No...ratings don't measure a kids level of development. Some max out at a early age. Those are the ones who are labeled as "busts" in college. Some develop slower, maybe they started playing ball late, or just genetics, muscle development wasn't there in High School and were "sleepers". Of all the players' Lavin brought in who were highly rated, I felt Garrett was the one with least upside. He's very athletic, but he's a baseball player, and that will have a huge impact on his development, or lack of. That being said, I think Dom is playing up to his ranking, and believe he will get better.
Think Dom is one of those kids whose trajectory was a bit flatter during year 1 but is definitely on the rise in most aspects...and while there is no excuse for throwing a punch, he appears to be a good kid...
And, by the way, Len Robbins is the quintessential opportunist -- not privy to anything that went on between Dom and Biedscheid or Knight, nor the history that led to Garrett's confrontation with GT -- but he is absolute in his position that these issues were all on the SJ player...he is always wrong but never in doubt