« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 13 »   Go Down

Bucknell

  • 249 replies
  • 19012 views
*

paultzman

  • *****
  • 16981
Bucknell
« on: November 13, 2013, 09:41:01 PM »
Not a "gimme" for sure;

@JonRothstein: Dave Paulsen and Bucknell went to Stanford last week and lost by four. Tonight they beat Penn State in Happy Valley 90-80. Solid team.
Logged
*

Poison

  • *****
  • 16896
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2013, 10:56:28 PM »
Bucknell could pound us.
Logged
*

Gray Chudney

  • *****
  • 1238
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #2 on: November 13, 2013, 11:04:59 PM »
Quote from: Poison on November 13, 2013, 10:56:28 PM
Bucknell could pound us.
Come on, Poison. It's highly unlikely that we'd get "pounded.."   We'll be 8-10 point favorites. I appreciate your skepticism on this board but this is unjustified hyperbolic negativity.
Logged
*

Poison

  • *****
  • 16896
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #3 on: November 13, 2013, 11:51:14 PM »
Quote from: Gray Chudney on November 13, 2013, 11:04:59 PM
Quote from: Poison on November 13, 2013, 10:56:28 PM
Bucknell could pound us.
Come on, Poison. It's highly unlikely that we'd get "pounded.."   We'll be 8-10 point favorites. I appreciate your skepticism on this board but this is unjustified hyperbolic negativity.

Every pre season we lose a game that we have no business losing. Actually, it's become the standard here. Bucknell won 28 games last year. No way they come out unprepared, and selfish like we did on Friday.
Logged
*

mjmaherjr

  • *****
  • 2776
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #4 on: November 13, 2013, 11:53:11 PM »
I have to agree with Poison. We always lose an early game it seems. I'm not taking any games for granted except for maybe long wood
Logged
*

Gray Chudney

  • *****
  • 1238
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #5 on: November 14, 2013, 07:44:19 AM »
I didn't say losing wasn't possible. I said getting pounded was a remote possibility at best and the comment was unnecessary. 
Logged
*

Section 9

  • ***
  • 323
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #6 on: November 14, 2013, 08:35:01 AM »
Quote from: mjmaherjr on November 13, 2013, 11:53:11 PM
I have to agree with Poison. We always lose an early game it seems. I'm not taking any games for granted except for maybe long wood

Longwood beat TCU at TCU by 82-79 Tuesday.
Logged
*

Poison

  • *****
  • 16896
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #7 on: November 14, 2013, 09:01:53 AM »
Quote from: Gray Chudney on November 14, 2013, 07:44:19 AM
I didn't say losing wasn't possible. I said getting pounded was a remote possibility at best and the comment was unnecessary. 

It's not a remote possibility. Bucknell has taken out Kansas in the tournament. They won 28 games last year. They should be favored.
« Last Edit: November 14, 2013, 09:02:29 AM by Poison »
Logged
*

Poison

  • *****
  • 16896
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #8 on: November 14, 2013, 09:03:13 AM »
Quote from: Section 9 on November 14, 2013, 08:35:01 AM
Quote from: mjmaherjr on November 13, 2013, 11:53:11 PM
I have to agree with Poison. We always lose an early game it seems. I'm not taking any games for granted except for maybe long wood

Longwood beat TCU at TCU by 82-79 Tuesday.

I've seen us to lose to Cal Irvine. We can lose to anyone.
Logged
*

derk

  • *****
  • 1360
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #9 on: November 14, 2013, 09:05:07 AM »
Quote from: Section 9 on November 14, 2013, 08:35:01 AM
Quote from: mjmaherjr on November 13, 2013, 11:53:11 PM
I have to agree with Poison. We always lose an early game it seems. I'm not taking any games for granted except for maybe long wood

And LIU barely lost to Indiana. INDIANA ! It happens. And this is just the kind of team we've lost to in the past. But it's time for us to start winning these occ early season games.

Longwood beat TCU at TCU by 82-79 Tuesday.
Logged
*

Poison

  • *****
  • 16896
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #10 on: November 14, 2013, 09:45:12 AM »
The real question is, how many local D1 teams haven't beaten STJ in the last 20 years?
Fordham, Manhattan, Iona, Hofstra, St.Francis, LIU and Fairfield have all beaten us.
(That's a lot of suffering)

And that's just off the top of my head. Stony Brook and Wagner have not beaten us. At least not in a very long time. Eventually, it's gonna happen.
Logged
*

CC

  • **
  • 224
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #11 on: November 14, 2013, 09:53:00 AM »
Quote from: Poison on November 14, 2013, 09:45:12 AM
The real question is, how many local D1 teams haven't beaten STJ in the last 20 years?
Fordham, Manhattan, Iona, Hofstra, St.Francis, LIU and Fairfield have all beaten us.
(That's a lot of suffering)

And that's just off the top of my head. Stony Brook and Wagner have not beaten us. At least not in a very long time. Eventually, it's gonna happen.

How embarrassing was it when STJ refused to play Hofstra anymore after they beat them a few times
Logged
*

Poison

  • *****
  • 16896
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #12 on: November 14, 2013, 10:01:11 AM »
Quote from: CC on November 14, 2013, 09:53:00 AM
Quote from: Poison on November 14, 2013, 09:45:12 AM
The real question is, how many local D1 teams haven't beaten STJ in the last 20 years?
Fordham, Manhattan, Iona, Hofstra, St.Francis, LIU and Fairfield have all beaten us.
(That's a lot of suffering)

And that's just off the top of my head. Stony Brook and Wagner have not beaten us. At least not in a very long time. Eventually, it's gonna happen.

How embarrassing was it when STJ refused to play Hofstra anymore after they beat them a few times

Iona, Manhattan, Niagara, the list feels like it's endless.
Logged
*

CC

  • **
  • 224
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #13 on: November 14, 2013, 10:03:24 AM »
Quote from: Poison on November 14, 2013, 10:01:11 AM
Quote from: CC on November 14, 2013, 09:53:00 AM
Quote from: Poison on November 14, 2013, 09:45:12 AM
The real question is, how many local D1 teams haven't beaten STJ in the last 20 years?
Fordham, Manhattan, Iona, Hofstra, St.Francis, LIU and Fairfield have all beaten us.
(That's a lot of suffering)

And that's just off the top of my head. Stony Brook and Wagner have not beaten us. At least not in a very long time. Eventually, it's gonna happen.

How embarrassing was it when STJ refused to play Hofstra anymore after they beat them a few times

Iona, Manhattan, Niagara, the list feels like it's endless.

Those three would make more sense than Longwood, Monmouth, and Youngstown St
Logged
*

Gray Chudney

  • *****
  • 1238
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #14 on: November 14, 2013, 10:05:42 AM »
Muscala graduated last year.  They are definitely less talented than last year's team.  We are much better and, while a loss is certainly possible, it is definitely unlikely that we lose big at home. 

I know it's a little early in the season to use this as gospel, but Pomeroy would suggest Bucknell is only better than DePaul in the Big East.  A tough mid major opponent, no doubt, but it's still unlikely that we would get beat worse than we did on the road v Wisconsin (12th in the country on KenPom).

If we lose, it will be a close game.  Even then, it's more likely that we win by double digits.
Logged
*

Gray Chudney

  • *****
  • 1238
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #15 on: November 14, 2013, 10:12:22 AM »
Quote from: Section 9 on November 14, 2013, 08:35:01 AM
Quote from: mjmaherjr on November 13, 2013, 11:53:11 PM
I have to agree with Poison. We always lose an early game it seems. I'm not taking any games for granted except for maybe long wood

Longwood beat TCU at TCU by 82-79 Tuesday.

Longwood is the 314th ranked team in the country.  Huge win against 264th ranked TCU, the worst team in the Big 12. 
Logged
*

newsman13

  • *****
  • 2165
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #16 on: November 14, 2013, 10:14:12 AM »
wagner did beat us back in the day when pj carlesimo coached them.

it's sad that our program has progressed so little that we're still worried about them and bucknell.
Logged
*

sju61982

  • ***
  • 307
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #17 on: November 14, 2013, 10:15:09 AM »
Quote from: CC on November 14, 2013, 10:03:24 AM
Quote from: Poison on November 14, 2013, 10:01:11 AM
Quote from: CC on November 14, 2013, 09:53:00 AM
Quote from: Poison on November 14, 2013, 09:45:12 AM
The real question is, how many local D1 teams haven't beaten STJ in the last 20 years?
Fordham, Manhattan, Iona, Hofstra, St.Francis, LIU and Fairfield have all beaten us.
(That's a lot of suffering)

And that's just off the top of my head. Stony Brook and Wagner have not beaten us. At least not in a very long time. Eventually, it's gonna happen.

How embarrassing was it when STJ refused to play Hofstra anymore after they beat them a few times

Iona, Manhattan, Niagara, the list feels like it's endless.

Those three would make more sense than Longwood, Monmouth, and Youngstown St

Monmouth and Longwood were not scheduled by us.  Part of the Barclays Classic.  Youngstown St. won 18 games last year, and went to the CIT posteseason.  Don't know what their returning situation is though.

I think the Bucknell game will be similar to the Detriot game last year, and the Lehigh game the year before that.  I wouldn't count this as the annual "on-campus shocking loss" because, IMO, Bucknell has too much credibility for that.  None of us would be really suprised by a loss, unlike Ashville last year, or Northeastern the year before.  Like I said though, I expect this game to be like the first two I mentioned, and those did wind up as victories in the end.
Logged
*

CC

  • **
  • 224
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #18 on: November 14, 2013, 10:23:15 AM »
Quote from: sju61982 on November 14, 2013, 10:15:09 AM
Quote from: CC on November 14, 2013, 10:03:24 AM
Quote from: Poison on November 14, 2013, 10:01:11 AM
Quote from: CC on November 14, 2013, 09:53:00 AM
Quote from: Poison on November 14, 2013, 09:45:12 AM
The real question is, how many local D1 teams haven't beaten STJ in the last 20 years?
Fordham, Manhattan, Iona, Hofstra, St.Francis, LIU and Fairfield have all beaten us.
(That's a lot of suffering)

And that's just off the top of my head. Stony Brook and Wagner have not beaten us. At least not in a very long time. Eventually, it's gonna happen.

How embarrassing was it when STJ refused to play Hofstra anymore after they beat them a few times

Iona, Manhattan, Niagara, the list feels like it's endless.

Those three would make more sense than Longwood, Monmouth, and Youngstown St

Monmouth and Longwood were not scheduled by us.  Part of the Barclays Classic.  Youngstown St. won 18 games last year, and went to the CIT posteseason.  Don't know what their returning situation is though.

I think the Bucknell game will be similar to the Detriot game last year, and the Lehigh game the year before that.  I wouldn't count this as the annual "on-campus shocking loss" because, IMO, Bucknell has too much credibility for that.  None of us would be really suprised by a loss, unlike Ashville last year, or Northeastern the year before.  Like I said though, I expect this game to be like the first two I mentioned, and those did wind up as victories in the end.

I like the Bucknell match up also, could be a possible 1st round of Ncaa type game.
Logged
*

Gray Chudney

  • *****
  • 1238
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #19 on: November 14, 2013, 10:25:53 AM »
Quote from: sju61982 on November 14, 2013, 10:15:09 AM
Quote from: CC on November 14, 2013, 10:03:24 AM
Quote from: Poison on November 14, 2013, 10:01:11 AM
Quote from: CC on November 14, 2013, 09:53:00 AM
Quote from: Poison on November 14, 2013, 09:45:12 AM
The real question is, how many local D1 teams haven't beaten STJ in the last 20 years?
Fordham, Manhattan, Iona, Hofstra, St.Francis, LIU and Fairfield have all beaten us.
(That's a lot of suffering)

And that's just off the top of my head. Stony Brook and Wagner have not beaten us. At least not in a very long time. Eventually, it's gonna happen.

How embarrassing was it when STJ refused to play Hofstra anymore after they beat them a few times

Iona, Manhattan, Niagara, the list feels like it's endless.

Those three would make more sense than Longwood, Monmouth, and Youngstown St

Monmouth and Longwood were not scheduled by us.  Part of the Barclays Classic.  Youngstown St. won 18 games last year, and went to the CIT posteseason.  Don't know what their returning situation is though.

I think the Bucknell game will be similar to the Detriot game last year, and the Lehigh game the year before that.  I wouldn't count this as the annual "on-campus shocking loss" because, IMO, Bucknell has too much credibility for that.  None of us would be really suprised by a loss, unlike Ashville last year, or Northeastern the year before.  Like I said though, I expect this game to be like the first two I mentioned, and those did wind up as victories in the end.
Detroit and Lehigh both had star upperclassmen guards who were better than any player on our roster (both are in the NBA now).  Lehigh beat Duke in the tournament that year, but they'd have no chance of beating Duke right now.  Similarly, beating Bucknell at home without Muscala (drafted 2nd round) is a completely different and less arduous task than if this game was played last season. 
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 13 »   Go Up
« previous next »