Looking forward a little bit, assuming they do re-sign lavin. A lot of the rhetoric on here has been to the effect of "we already know what lavin can do" i.e., he's peaked. My question is, is that true? I think Lavin did a poor job recruiting last year (and the year before that), which left the team with no bigs, and I think he could do better than he has shown. Remember, he came to a team that had been terrible for 6 years under norm, and managed 3 20-win seasons and 2 ncaa tournaments out of five years. If he's able to land a few studs and fill out the rest of the team with good players, I could see him getting us to 2 sweet sixteens over the next 5 years. Heck, I think he could have done that this year if he had another decent big, or two. I would be satisfied with that, some of you would call that "accepting mediocrity." I would love to be playing on thursday, and I think lavin gives us a decent chance of doing that a couple of times over the next 5 or so years.
It's kind of funny, because if you see the ovation he gets at games, I would probably be closer to the "dislike" on the lavin spectrum, because I am upset with how he handled recruiting the past couple of years, but on here it's just the opposite.