Wrong. I only mentioned an un-ranked player out of HS. Made no reference to him being an all-American.
Yeah, not wrong. Most players are unranked coming out of high school. You mentioned the one guy who was unranked coming out of high school who went on to become an all American. If his transformation was immaterial you didn't have a point; if it was material your point was dumb. Which is it?
There are plenty of examples of low ranked players performing well. Also plenty of examples of higher ranked players not performing up to expectations. We have landed a couple of them threw the years.
Yes, obviously. I'd say that recruiting isn't an exact science, but that would be stupid, because it's not science at all. You don't need to be a scientist to know that. It is however a system relied upon by every successful coach in college basketball over the past several generations to predict the probability of high performance at the college level. Obviously there will be outliers and anomalies. What you'd be hard pressed to find are many successful coaches who've had sustained success in in major CBB recruiting outliers and anomalies.
Those saying CMA’s commits aren’t BE talent because of their ranking I feel that is premature. Time will tell.
How do you feel about those lauding Coach Third Choice for his recruiting prowess despite their rankings and where are your posts counseling them to be patient. Because I missed those.