I don't know 6 tournament appearances in 7 years at UCLA got canned after the first one he missed. UCLA has some high standards. I think with the right staff surrounding him he could be a gem.
Also he has been of interest to other schools vacancies but apparently he's enjoying the easy life of being an analyst. Well easy in comparison to the everyday hustle of being a college basketball coach.
Honestly, of the candidates being tossed around (Skinner, Baron, McCaffery), Lavin is probably the best name. But it still amazes me how absolutely botched this entire process has been. We fire a coach, proclaim that we're going to pay top dollar for a big name, and possibly end up with someone who hasn't coached since 2003? Was there a plan or any form of due diligence by Monasch on this?
What really bothers me was this process was supposed to bring some optimism to all of the fans of this program. We've suffered 6 years of incompetence with Roberts and one would figure that we could look forward to bringing in someone top notch who could fix the situation and get St. John's back to an elite level. They get all our hopes up with the Donovan talk and end up offering less than what he is already making at Florida. Then, they turn their focus on Hewitt, who has a career ACC record of 67-93. We get turned down by Hewitt and before we can even reach out to the next candidate (Greenberg), he re-signs with VT. Meanwhile, our fail safe candidate (Pecora) cannot wait any longer and heads over to the Bronx to sign with Fordham. Then, they bring in Skinner, whose career ACC record is 106-106 and the farthest he has taken BC in 13 years is the Sweet Sixteen. Then, they bring in McCaffery and almost immediately after his interview, he turns his attention to Iowa and heads over there.
Seriously, what the hell is going on? Is it that this school is really that undesirable? Or is it because a lot of these coaches have taken notice of this unorganized process and been turned off by it?