Logen,
I respect you coming over here to discuss but you better bring it man!
Comparing St. John's to Seton Hall is apples and oranges (no pun intended). Harkless came when there were 9 available scholarships and Seton Hall just signed 3 questionable guys this past season after striking out on others. They have a logjam of bad scholarship players.
Willard didn't win a tournament game in the MAAC, his staff's resume doesn't stack up to other schools within the conference. This isn't to discredit them and they are working as hard if not harder than anyone within the conference. They are great group of coaches and they've been visible at every event possible but at the end of the day this doesn't mean that they can close. They have a very uphill battle, one that any fan here is already all too familiar with.
Totally agree, Dave. Harkless came when we had three coaches with NBA experience. Rico Hines trained some of the best young stars in the game. Gene Keady won SIX national coach of the year awards!!!!
Willard has no resume as a head coach and his staff pales in comparison to what Lavin assembled.
If you think that Seton Hall had any less talent than STJ, then the conversation does end there. We had two kids that could make a basket from three. You guys had way more sucess with your group the previous three years than our group did and you had the (much) higher ranked recruits (with more size).
Seton Hall is my second favorit team in the Big East, but it would, at best, be a Marshon Brooks-Providence type of relationship for KA and Seton Hall. I wish it was you guys blowing up instead of Rutgers, but it's not. You guys are in really bad shape. When our fourth string SF could star for your team...it's bad.